Please No Plagiarism I Have Attached An Example To Go By
Please No Plagiarism I Have Attached An Example To Go By The Populat
Please no plagiarism. I have attached an example to go by. The population I chose and currently work with are incarcerated juveniles, so at-risk youth. Boundary Issues It may not be possible or reasonable for counselors to always avoid dual relationships with clients. For example, counselors who live and work in small rural communities may attend the same religious institutions as their clients, or use the same libraries, doctors, or other services.
In these multiple-relationship situations, counselors would not be in violation of ethical standards if they took reasonable steps to protect their objectivity and efficacy, and to avoid possibilities of exploitation or harm. Counselors and supervisors usually consider dual relationships on a continuum of risk. As you work through the notion of dual relationships, you should consider the relationship with your client and the context of the situation. It is also important to consider the impact of dual roles on the power dynamics of the therapeutic relationship. For example, clients, students, and supervisees have less experience, knowledge, and power compared with licensed counselors and supervisors.
Consequently, they are less likely to recognize inappropriate boundary crossings or to express their concerns about these crossings. It is your responsibility as an ethical practitioner to monitor and ensure appropriate boundaries across all related counseling situations. For this Discussion, review the Clinical Mental Health Counseling: Boundary Issues media and consider the population that you are interested in working with as a professional counselor. Then, review the Learning Resources for this week and explore potential boundary issues you may encounter while working with this population. Reflect on potential benefit or harm related to boundary crossing.
Finally, consider potential consultants who might be able to address any boundary issues. Post by Day 3 a brief description of the population you selected. Then, explain any potential boundary issues you anticipate may be challenging in working with this population and explain why. Explain the potential benefit or harm associated with boundary crossing with this population. Finally, explain who you might consult with to address this boundary issue and why.
Be sure to use the Learning Resources and the current literature to support your response. Respond by Day 5 and expand on your colleague’s posting by providing an alternate perspective on how you would work with your colleague’s selected population. Provide potential boundary crossing challenges that your colleague did not discuss and offer potential solutions for addressing these challenges.
Paper For Above instruction
The population I am interested in working with is incarcerated juveniles, a subgroup of at-risk youth. This population faces unique challenges and contextual factors that influence boundary considerations in counseling. Juveniles in correctional settings often have complex emotional, behavioral, and social issues, which necessitate careful boundary management to ensure effective and ethical counseling practice. Boundary issues in working with incarcerated youth require a nuanced understanding of the power dynamics, confidentiality limits, and the potential for dual relationships, which may arise due to the close-knit environment of correctional facilities.
One potential boundary issue I anticipate involves the dual role of counselor and authority figure. Since correctional counselors often have a supervisory or disciplinary role, there is an inherent risk of boundary crossing when the individual also serves as a source of emotional support and guidance. Such dual roles may blur the lines of authority and confidentiality, potentially impacting the therapeutic alliance and the client's trust. For example, if a counselor also participates in disciplinary proceedings or social activities within the facility, it could compromise the neutrality and objectivity necessary for effective therapy.
Another boundary concern is the issue of confidentiality and mandated reporting. Incarcerated juveniles are often involved in situations where disclosure could lead to disciplinary action or legal consequences, which might deter honest communication. Navigating these boundaries requires transparency about the limits of confidentiality from the outset, as well as clear explanations of mandated reporting laws. The potential harm in boundary crossing here includes damaging trust or unintentionally revealing sensitive information, which could have repercussions within the correctional environment.
Boundary crossing may also occur through informal interactions, such as socializing within the facility or accepting gifts from clients. While these actions might seem benign or foster rapport, they can undermine professional boundaries and lead to exploitation or dependency. Therefore, establishing clear policies prohibiting such interactions helps maintain professional integrity and protects both clients and counselors.
The benefits of managing boundaries effectively in this context include maintaining a professional relationship rooted in trust and safety, which supports rehabilitation and growth. Conversely, boundary violations can cause harm by undermining the client's sense of security, increasing the risk of manipulation or dependency, and compromising ethical standards. For example, inappropriate relationships can lead to exploitation, legal repercussions, and damage to the counselor's reputation, emphasizing the importance of boundary vigilance.
To address these boundary issues, consultation with supervisors, ethical boards, and experienced colleagues is essential. Supervisors provide oversight and guidance when navigating complex dual relationships or conflicts of interest. Consulting with legal and ethical advisors ensures adherence to laws governing minors and correctional facilities. Engaging with colleagues who have experience working with juvenile offenders offers practical insights and shared strategies for boundary management in these unique environments. Such collaborations foster ethical resilience and promote best practices.
In conclusion, working with incarcerated juveniles involves navigating complex boundary issues that require constant supervision and ethical awareness. Recognizing potential boundary crossings, understanding their implications, and consulting appropriate supervisors and legal resources help safeguard the well-being of clients and uphold the integrity of the counseling profession. By proactively managing boundaries, counselors contribute positively to the rehabilitation and development of at-risk youth within correctional settings.
References
- Herlihy, B., & Corey, G. (2015). ACA ethical standards casebook (7th ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
- Remley, T. P., Jr., & Herlihy, B. (2016). Ethical, legal, and professional issues in counseling (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Erickson, S. H. (2001). Multiple relationships in rural counseling. The Family Journal, 9(3), 302–304.
- Herlihy, B., & Corey, G. (2015). Case Study 8: Couples Counseling Gone Wrong. In ACA ethical standards casebook.
- Herlihy, B., & Corey, G. (2015). Case Study 9: I’m Stuck. In ACA ethical standards casebook.
- Brown, C., & Trangsrud, H. B. (2008). Factors associated with acceptance and decline of client gift giving. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(5), 505–511.
- Burwell-Pender, L., & Halinski, K. H. (2008). Enhanced awareness of countertransference. Journal of Professional Counseling, Practice, Theory, & Research, 36(2), 38–51.
- Kress, V. E., & Dixon, A. (2007). Factors influencing faculty-student sexual relationships in counselor education. Counselor Education & Supervision, 47(2), 110–122.
- Pope, K. S., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2008). A practical approach to boundaries in psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(5), 638–652.
- Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2012). Clinical mental health counseling: Boundary issues [Video]. Baltimore, MD: Author.