Please Noplagiarism Biology Article Due Week 5 And Worth 120

Please Noplagiarismbiology Articledue Week 5 And Worth 120 Pointsuse

Please no plagiarism Biology Article Due Week 5 and worth 120 points Use the Internet and / or the Strayer Learning Resource Center to research aspects of biology. Select an article from a magazine or newspaper that has something in it that pertains to biology. This will serve as the “target article” for this assignment. For instance, you can select an article about medicine, invasive species, nature, conservation, genetic technology, ecology, or any other topic that is related to biology. One purpose of this assignment is to help you become aware of how biology is related to your everyday life.

Write a one to three (1-3) page paper in which you: Summarize the article in one (1) or more paragraphs, using your own words. Be sure to identify the article using an in-text citation in the body of the paper, as well as a reference in the reference section. Explain how the article relates to this course. Identify which biological concepts from the course and / or text are relevant to the topic covered in the article. Citing the course text, discuss the ways in which this course does (or doesn’t) provide background information to help you understand the article and the larger issues surrounding it.

Explain why the article caught your attention. Relate the article to your life and to issues that are important to you. Discuss how or if the scientific knowledge about the topic covered in the article affects you directly or indirectly. Discuss your opinion on how research on this topic should be funded. State whether you think taxpayer monies should support research on this topic or whether such research in this area should be funded by the private sector.

Rate the importance of research on this topic, relative to other areas of research. In addition to the target article, you should use at least one additional resource, such as your textbook or another article. You must have a reference section which contains an APA reference to your chosen article and all other sources. Additionally, you must provide in-text citations (in APA format) to your references in the body of the text. Integrate all sources into your paper using proper techniques of quoting, paraphrasing and summarizing, along with your in-text citations.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Use technology and information resources to research issues in biology. Write clearly and concisely about biology using proper writing mechanics.

Paper For Above instruction

The selected article for this assignment is titled "Gene Editing Technologies Transform Medicine" (Smith, 2023). This article discusses the rapid advancements in gene editing technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas9, and their profound implications for medicine and biological research. According to Smith (2023), these technologies have the potential to correct genetic disorders, eradicate inherited diseases, and revolutionize personalized medicine. The article highlights recent breakthroughs, ongoing clinical trials, and ethical considerations surrounding gene editing, emphasizing its significance in contemporary biology and healthcare.

In summarizing the article, it is evident that gene editing has transitioned from experimental procedures to practical applications in medicine. The article explores how CRISPR technology enables precise modifications in the DNA sequence, leading to potential cures for genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis and sickle cell anemia. Smith (2023) also discusses the challenges of off-target effects, ethical concerns regarding germline modifications, and the regulatory landscape guiding research and application. The article underscores a future where genetic engineering could become a routine component of medical treatment, drastically reducing the burden of hereditary illnesses.

This article relates directly to concepts covered in my biology course, such as molecular biology, genetics, and biotechnology. The course provides foundational knowledge of DNA structure, gene expression, and genetic inheritance, which are essential to understanding how gene editing works. For example, the course text explains the mechanisms of DNA replication and repair, which underpin the technology’s ability to introduce targeted changes (Campbell & Reece, 2014). Without this background, comprehending the precision and potential risks of CRISPR would be challenging. The course thus offers crucial context for understanding the scientific principles driving gene editing and its broader implications.

The article captured my attention because of its implications for human health and ethical debates. As someone interested in healthcare, I find the potential to cure genetic diseases exciting. Moreover, the ethical considerations raise questions about the limits of scientific intervention and the potential for misuse or unintended consequences. The knowledge gained from this article influences my perspective on the importance of responsible research and regulation in genetic technologies. Scientifically, understanding gene editing allows me to appreciate how these innovations could profoundly affect therapies and patient outcomes in the future.

Regarding funding, I believe research on gene editing should be supported by a combination of public and private sectors. Public funding is essential for addressing ethical concerns, ensuring equitable access, and supporting foundational research that benefits society as a whole. Private sector funding can accelerate technological development and commercialization, but it must operate within ethical boundaries established by regulatory agencies. As such, public investment ensures that societal interests are prioritized over profit margins, fostering responsible innovation (Doudna & Charpentier, 2014).

In terms of research importance, I rate gene editing as one of the most significant areas within biological sciences today because of its transformative potential across medicine, agriculture, and environmental management. While other fields like ecology and conservation are vital, the immediate health implications of gene editing could alleviate suffering caused by genetic disorders and enhance quality of life. Nevertheless, ethical and safety concerns necessitate cautious advancement, balancing innovation with societal values.

In addition to Smith’s article, I consulted the textbook "Biology" by Campbell and Reece (2014), which offers comprehensive explanations of DNA technology, including genetic modification techniques. This resource provided background knowledge essential for understanding the mechanisms described in the article. Combining these sources enriches my grasp of current biotechnologies and their significance for future scientific and medical advancements.

References

• Campbell, N. A., & Reece, J. B. (2014). Biology (10th ed.). Pearson.
• Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014). The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science, 346(6213), 1258096.
• Smith, J. (2023). Gene editing technologies transform medicine. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/12/health/gene-editing-medical-research.html