Please Read The Case Study Below And Read On Situational Lea

Please Read The Case Study Below And Read On Situational Leadership A

Please read the case study below and read on situational leadership. After your reading please answer the discussion questions below. Case Study (Case study begins here -) Mr. Brown was promoted to be a general manager of a particular call center in South Florida. Mr. Brown was coming off a great historical success story from taking over a call center in Boston whose previous leader (Mr. Jackson) preferred to use a democratic leadership style and his democratic style-built flexibility and a sense of responsibility within the group of the employees. Due to the initial success under Mr. Jackson, that call center took on 10 new accounts; And what was once a great attribute in terms of Mr. Jackson’s democratic style of getting each person’s input prior to making decisions turned into a liability when the groups work-load more than tripled. Due to all the new clients the team was responsible for servicing in addition to the new team members that needed to be trained, Mr. Jackson’s democratic leadership style created too many inefficiencies that aggravated the stress on the team. The account holders began to have greater dissatisfaction with the level of service, and they were at risk of losing not only the additional accounts they have added but the accounts that existed prior to the additions. Mr. Brown was hired in part to stop the bleeding. Mr. Brown’s leadership style was less democratic and told the subordinates what needed to be done to solve the problems. His success of helping the team meet the deadlines that the clients needed, help save the call center from losing those accounts. However, when Mr. Brown reached his new location, he noticed that his leadership style that he attributed to his previous success in helping the team in Boston was not impacting the bottom line, nor the morale of his new team. His new team was exceptionally talented and did not need training. They knew how to perform the task at hand, but the morale was negatively impacted due to some layoffs and other issues prior to Mr. Brown’s arrival. His leadership style only intensified the problem when he was not cognizant of the morale problem of his team. Mr. Brown called on a mentor that was named Mrs. Pierre. Mr. Brown was apprehensive of adapting a democratic leadership style due to the heavy deadlines that still was needed to be hit, as well as his memory of how poorly that turned out for Mr. Jackson. Mr. Brown subsequently conveyed his frustration of not understanding what steps to take with his mentor. Mrs. Pierre informed Mr. Brown, that although she did not believe a democratic leadership style was needed for this team, she also highlighted that there wasn’t a style that can fit every situation, and that great leaders adapt their styles to the situation. She informed him that they are situations where the Democratic leadership style will be needed, and great leaders consider the pros and cons of each style to the situation prior to choosing one. She suggested he consider an Affiliative leadership style in which more praise is given to the team members for what they are doing right to help boost the morale so that the team will know that their mastery and dedication is recognized and appreciated. Discussion Questions: Is there a leadership style that could be used in most situations to bring optimum results? IF so, what is the leadership style? If not, why? What two elements must one try to assess from those he intends to lead to determine which style is most effective? What two individuals help coined the term Situational Leadership? Situational Leadership encourages the leader to evaluate what of the follower? (From Case study) What conclusions did Mr. Brown come to when attempting to implement what worked in the last team with his new team? (From Case study) Was Mr. Jackson's leadership style one that was overall bad in every situation? Please explain (From Case study) What adjustments should Mr. Jackson made after the success of the first leadership style he implemented? (From Case study) What was Mr. Brown’s mentor Mrs. Pierre advise? And did he eventually get it?

Paper For Above instruction

The landscape of effective leadership is complex and context-dependent, making it challenging to identify a universal leadership style that guarantees optimal results across all situations. While certain leadership styles, such as transformational, servant, or participative leadership, possess qualities that can be broadly beneficial, the reality is that no single style can be deemed universally effective for every scenario. The primary reason for this is that leadership success hinges on factors like the readiness, motivation, and morale of followers, the nature of the task, organizational culture, and external pressures. Consequently, adaptive leaders who can modify their approach according to situational demands are more likely to succeed than those who rigidly adhere to one style.

Two critical elements that leaders must assess to determine the most effective style are the followers' competence and commitment. As per Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory, understanding whether team members are high or low in these dimensions helps leaders select an appropriate approach. For example, if followers are highly competent but lack confidence, a coaching or supportive style may be most effective. Conversely, if followers lack both competence and motivation, a directing style may be necessary. By evaluating these elements, leaders can tailor their behavior to meet followers’ developmental needs optimally.

The term "Situational Leadership" was coined by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard in 1969. Their model emphasizes the leader's flexibility in adjusting styles based on followers’ maturity levels, thereby promoting more effective leadership outcomes. The approach encourages leaders to evaluate the followers’ "readiness," which encompasses their ability and willingness to complete a task. This focus on followers’ development stage aligns with evaluating their competence and commitment, enabling leaders to choose a direction that enhances motivation and performance.

From the case study, Mr. Brown had initially attempted to apply his previous successful leadership style — which was less democratic and more directive — to his new team. However, he realized that this approach did not have the same positive impact on morale or performance, particularly because his new team was already highly capable but demotivated due to layoffs and other issues. Consequently, Mr. Brown concluded that simply transplanting his earlier approach was ineffective and that he needed to adapt his style to the team’s specific needs. This insight aligns with the core principle of situational leadership—that leadership must be flexible and responsive.

Mr. Jackson’s leadership style, primarily democratic, was not inherently bad but was contextually unsuitable when the call center's workload increased dramatically. His democratic style promoted employee involvement and responsibility, creating a sense of flexibility and shared ownership. Yet, during periods of increased workload and stress, this style led to inefficiencies, delays, and dissatisfaction. Thus, while democratic leadership can foster innovation and responsibility, it is not universally suitable, especially when quick decision-making or clear directives are needed. In essence, Mr. Jackson’s style was not "bad" in all situations but needed to be complemented or adjusted based on circumstances.

After witnessing the limitations of his initial leadership style in Boston, Mr. Jackson could have made adjustments by incorporating more directive elements during crises and balancing democratic decision-making with clearer guidance when rapid results were necessary. Additionally, he could have monitored workload and stress levels, shifting his style as needed to maintain efficiency without sacrificing team engagement or morale. Such flexibility would have aligned more closely with the principles of situational leadership, optimizing performance across varying circumstances.

Mrs. Pierre advised Mr. Brown to consider that no single leadership style is universally applicable and emphasized the importance of evaluating followers’ readiness and morale. She suggested that he adopt a more affiliative style—focused on praise and emotional connection—to boost morale among his talented but demoralized team. She cautioned against rigidly applying a single approach and instead advocated for adaptive leadership—choosing styles that best fit the context. Ultimately, Mr. Brown recognized that understanding his team's unique needs and adjusting his approach accordingly was crucial. Over time, by following her guidance, he began to appreciate the importance of flexibility and emotional intelligence in leadership, leading to improved team dynamics and performance subject to ongoing adjustment.

References

• Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. (1969). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilising Human Resources. Prentice-Hall.
• Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, S. (1985). The Situational Leader. LD Journal, 13(2), 45-50.
• Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that Gets Results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78-90.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Graeff, C. L. (1983). The Situational Leadership Theory: A Critical Review. The Journal of Management Studies, 20(2), 237-260.
• Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational Leadership: Industry, Military, and Educational Practice. New York: Routledge.
• Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Manual. Mind Garden.
• Clawson, J. G. (2013). Level Three Leadership: Getting Results in Complex Worlds. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage publications.