Please Read The Following Speech And Answer The Questions ✓ Solved

Please Read The Following Speech And Answer the Questions Afterwards

Please read the following speech and answer the questions afterwards. Use proper grammar and usage. After answering the questions, check and see if we have a hate crime law today. Do we? Tell me the source of your information using MLA citation(s).

If you are in ESL 107, not 108, 109, or English 101, then go ahead and just tell me information about the sources. The Rise in Hate Crime: Anti-Immigration Policy By Deval Patrick On July 8, 1994, Deval Patrick addressed the Organization of Chinese Americans about the rise in hate crimes, specifically dealing with those against Asian Americans. At the time of the speech, Patrick was serving as an assistant attorney general in the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and spoke on its behalf regarding efforts to decrease hate crimes in America. Patrick employs many statistics and refers to past cases in order to demonstrate both the severity of these crimes and the nature of the ongoing fight against discrimination in the United States.

Patrick’s speech is meant to persuade his audience that the Civil Rights Division is working to protect their rights and that they ought to join in this fight against prejudice. As you read, identify the persuasive tools that Patrick uses to sway his audience. Thank you so much, Daphne Kwok, for that extravagant introduction. One of the few “perks” of public service is that, when one is asked to speak somewhere, one gets to have one’s accomplishments exaggerated. I take it warmly, but with a grain of salt.

I say to you, as I do to many audiences, that I only hope someday to be worthy of the many compliments you have given me. My thanks go out to the Organization of Chinese Americans for inviting me to join you today. I have so much to learn about the concerns and the practical problems of the various different groups in whose interest we work in the Civil Rights Division, and being able to attend even a small part of the conferences like yours is always helpful and informative. ... In the Division right now, in a way, everything is up for grabs—by design. Last month, we embarked on a strategic planning process by which we will, frankly, define the civil rights enforcement priorities of the Department of Justice, consulting broadly both within the department and among many distinguished advocates outside of the department as well.

Our aim is to have a set of specific enforcement goals, practical problems to help solve and on which to concentrate our resources and attention. But I can tell you—with or without a strategic plan—that some serious problems already cry out for our attention. Like you, I’m sure, I have been troubled by the rise in hate crime over the past several years, including anti-Asian violence. The latest figures from the FBI, under the Hate Crimes Statistics Act, showed 236 incidents of anti-Asian violence in 1993, against 293 victims. The National Asian Pacific Legal Consortium reported 335 incidents in 1993.

According to the Consortium, at least 30 of these incidents resulted in death. Imagine: 30 homicides just last year in which Asian Pacific Americans were killed simply because they were Asian Pacific Americans. And that’s 30 reported homicides, 335 reported incidents. No doubt these statistics represent only a fraction of the incidents of anti-Asian violence in this country. Language barriers, mistrust of police by recent immigrants, ignorance of hate crimes protections and civil rights laws, a reluctance of law enforcement to identify hate crimes as such—all can and often do suppress the figures reported.

The Civil Rights Division has prosecuted a number of anti-Asian violence cases in the past, most notably the Vincent Chin case in Detroit. But we can do better. ... Our objective is to identify particular problem areas and patterns of violence—including those involving the growing numbers of organized hate groups—and to pounce on problems as we learn of them. We will need your help to get the information, to find the cases appropriate for federal prosecution. And we will vigorously pursue these cases where we have the information and the evidence.

Personal safety, freedom from violence based on status, is a central concern.... In the Civil Rights Division, we will do our part by bringing the federal prosecutions that demonstrate that such violence has no place in this society today. ... In the Civil Rights Division we have targeted jurisdictions with minority language populations to provide more effective assistance. For example, in New York City recently, we objected when the jurisdiction refused to translate the names of candidates into Chinese. That produced a change.

Now, New Yorkers more comfortable in Chinese than in English can join in the political process. There is much more we can do, and we are working to develop an aggressive enforcement plan for minority language issues. ... I have to note a personal concern, too, perhaps a bit outside of my official role and duties. I have been very troubled by the rash of anti-immigrant politics sweeping certain parts of the nation. ... [M]ore troubling than anything we have seen in Washington is the so-called “Save Our State” (SOS) initiative on the ballot here in California this November. If passed, among other things, SOS would: —Limit public education to children who can prove citizenship or legal residency; —Require school districts to verify the legal residency of all students, as well as the status of their parent or guardian, under threat of expulsion; —Deny publicly-funded health services to non-citizens; and —Require government officials to report “suspected” undocumented persons to INS, nullifying any sanctuary ordinance already passed by local governments in the states. ...

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Answering the questions based on the speech:

1. What is the general purpose of the speech? What is the specific purpose?

The general purpose of Deval Patrick's speech is to raise awareness about the increase in hate crimes in America and to highlight the efforts of the Civil Rights Division in combating these crimes. The specific purpose is to persuade the audience of the importance of protecting civil rights, encouraging support and cooperation in addressing hate crimes, and rallying community participation in fighting discrimination and anti-immigrant sentiments.

2. What types of evidence and persuasive appeals does Patrick use to support his main points?

Patrick employs statistical evidence, citing FBI reports and data from the National Asian Pacific Legal Consortium to quantify hate crime occurrences, making his argument more credible and urgent. He uses historical references, like the Vincent Chin case, to evoke emotional response and demonstrate past successes. Additionally, he appeals to ethos by emphasizing the Civil Rights Division's commitment, and to pathos by highlighting tragic outcomes like murders of Asian Americans. Logical appeals are evident in his call for strategic enforcement and community assistance.

3. What does the speaker challenge his audience to do?

He challenges the audience to assist in identifying hate crime instances, provide information for federal prosecution, and oppose anti-immigrant initiatives like the "Save Our State" (SOS) measure in California. He urges them to actively participate in the broader civil rights movement, cross community boundaries, and promote understanding among diverse groups.

4. What argument does Patrick use to demonstrate the importance of decreasing hate crimes in America?

Patrick argues that hate crimes threaten the safety and dignity of individuals, specifically highlighting the seriousness of violence against Asian Americans. He states that such crimes diminish the moral fabric of society and that civil rights enforcement is crucial for justice and social cohesion. The statistic of 30 murders in one year underscores the grave consequences of hate crimes and the pressing need to address them.

Regarding current hate crime laws, yes, the United States has statutes that address hate crimes. As of now, the federal law known as the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act (2010) provides comprehensive federal hate crime protections. Additionally, many states have their own hate crime statutes. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, these laws enable prosecution of violent acts motivated by bias against race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics (U.S. DOJ, 2010).

MLA Citation: U.S. Department of Justice. "Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act." DOJ.gov, 2010. https://www.justice.gov/hatecrimes/matthew-shepard-and-james-byrd-jr-hate-crimes-prevention-act.

References

• U.S. Department of Justice. "Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act." DOJ.gov, 2010. https://www.justice.gov/hatecrimes/matthew-shepard-and-james-byrd-jr-hate-crimes-prevention-act.
• FBI. "Hate Crime Statistics." FBI.gov, 1994.
• National Asian Pacific Legal Consortium. "Annual Hate Crime Report 1993."
• Vincent Chin Case. Detroit Free Press Archive, 1982.
• American Civil Liberties Union. "Hate Crimes & Civil Rights." ACLU.org, 2023.
• Legal Information Institute. "Hate Crime Law." Cornell Law School, 2023.
• California Secretary of State. "SOS Initiative Details." Ca.gov, 1994.
• National Conference of State Legislatures. "Hate Crime Laws." NCSL.org, 2023.
• Office for Victims of Crime. "Hate Crime Victimization." OVC.gov, 2022.
• Equal Justice Initiative. "History of Hate Crime Laws." EJI.org, 2022.