Please Respond To The Following What Incentives Influence Fi

Please Respond To The Followingwhat Incentives Influence Firms To Use

Please respond to the following: What incentives influence firms to use international strategies? What are the three basic benefits firms can gain by successfully implementing an international strategy? Why? Determine why, given the advantages of international diversification, some firms choose not to expand internationally. Provide specific examples to support your response. As firms attempt to internationalize, they may be tempted to locate their facilities where business regulation laws are lax. Discuss the advantages and potential risks of such an approach, using specific examples to support your response. Be sure to respond to at least one of your classmates' posts.

Paper For Above instruction

In today’s interconnected global economy, firms are increasingly adopting international strategies to enhance their competitiveness, achieve growth, and diversify risk. Several incentives drive firms toward internationalization, including access to new markets, cost advantages, resource acquisition, and the pursuit of innovation. By expanding abroad, firms can tap into previously inaccessible customer bases, benefit from lower production costs, and access resources not available domestically, thereby strengthening their competitive position.

One primary incentive for firms to pursue international strategies is the desire to access new markets. As domestic markets mature or saturate, companies look outward to sustain growth. For instance, technology firms like Apple have expanded globally to capitalize on the growing demand for smartphones in emerging economies such as India and China. These markets offer substantial revenue opportunities and potential for long-term growth that cannot be fully realized domestically.

Cost reduction is another critical motivator. Offshoring manufacturing and other operations to countries with lower labor and operational costs allows firms to improve profit margins. For example, many apparel companies, such as Nike and Adidas, have established manufacturing facilities in countries like Vietnam and Bangladesh to benefit from cheaper wages and production costs. Such international strategies enable firms to compete effectively on price in global markets.

Access to resources and capabilities also incentivize firms to expand internationally. Natural resources, technological expertise, and specialized labor pools unavailable domestically can be accessed through foreign direct investment. For instance, pharmaceutical companies often conduct research and development in countries known for scientific talent, such as Switzerland or South Korea, to leverage specific expertise.

The three basic benefits that firms can gain through successful international strategy implementation are increased market share, economies of scale, and diversification of risk. Increased market share results from tapping into new customer bases, boosting revenues, and establishing brand recognition abroad. Economies of scale are achieved as firms produce large quantities for multiple markets, reducing per-unit costs and increasing efficiency. Diversification of risk involves spreading business operations across different geographical regions, thereby reducing dependence on a single economy’s stability; during economic downturns or political unrest in one country, other markets can help stabilize overall firm performance.

Despite these advantages, some firms choose not to expand internationally, even when such diversification presents clear benefits. Risks related to political instability, cultural differences, and legal uncertainties can deter expansion. For example, Walmart’s attempts to enter the German market failed largely due to cultural misalignments and local competitors, leading the company to withdraw. Companies may also face high entry barriers, such as tariffs, quotas, and complex regulations, which diminish potential gains or increase costs significantly.

Additionally, the temptation to locate facilities in countries with lax regulation laws can be appealing due to lower operational costs and fewer compliance requirements. The primary advantage of such an approach is significant cost savings—lower taxes, fewer regulations, and reduced compliance expenses can enhance profit margins. For example, some multinational corporations have established facilities in countries with lenient environmental or labor laws, such as certain regions in Southeast Asia or Africa, to capitalize on these benefits.

However, there are substantial risks associated with operating in jurisdictions with weak regulatory oversight. These include ethical concerns, reputational damage, and legal liabilities if violations are detected. For instance, companies like Nike faced criticism and boycotts when reports of poor working conditions and child labor in factories in countries with lax enforcement surfaced. These risks can lead to long-term damage to brand reputation, consumer trust, and potential legal penalties.

In conclusion, while international strategies can offer numerous advantages such as market expansion, cost savings, resource access, and diversification, firms must carefully weigh the associated risks. Strategic considerations, including regulatory environments and cultural compatibility, play a crucial role in determining whether internationalization is a viable and sustainable option for a firm. Careful assessment and ethical considerations are vital to sustainably leveraging the benefits of international expansion without falling prey to its pitfalls.

References

• Ghemawat, P. (2007). Redefining global strategy: Crossing borders in a converging world. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2020). Strategic management: Concepts and cases: Competitiveness and globalization. Cengage Learning.
• Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.
• Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. (2017). Making globalization work: How companies can manage across borders. Pearson.
• Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2008). A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3), 341–358.
• Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. K. (2007). Nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance: The role of risk management and organizational culture. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 323–350.
• Cheng, J. M., & Kessler, A. (2008). Economic and strategic benefits of international diversification. Journal of Business Strategy, 29(4), 29–36.
• Palmer, C., & Barber, J. (2020). Ethical challenges of global business: The case of weak regulatory environments. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30(4), 527–551.
• Peng, M. W. (2021). Global strategy. Cengage Learning.
• Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intra-firm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476.