Please Review The Substantive Posting Requirements Posted In
Please Review The Substantive Posting Requirements Posted In The Forum
Please review the substantive posting requirements posted in the forum and announcements: When you post responses to your peers, the response needs to be "substantive" to receive credit. Substantive posting criteria include: acknowledging what your peer stated (agree or disagree), including additional information, and ending the post with an open-ended follow-up question to encourage further discussion. Additionally, you must cite and reference the article in APA format for this assignment. Please include one question along with your post for your peer to answer.
Paper For Above instruction
The instructions emphasize the importance of substantive engagement in online discussion forums, specifically in academic settings. To earn full credit, students must formulate responses that are more than mere agree/disagree statements; their responses should demonstrate critical thinking and engagement with the material. Such responses should acknowledge the peer’s statements, provide relevant additional insights or evidence, and foster ongoing dialogue by posing thoughtful, open-ended questions.
Effective substantive posting enhances community learning and critical discourse. Therefore, students must carefully craft posts that reflect comprehension and integration of the assigned reading or topic, as well as demonstrate respectful engagement with peers' opinions. Citing and referencing the original article or source in APA format is essential to uphold scholarly integrity and provide context for the discussion.
Furthermore, encouraging students to pose open-ended questions serves to deepen academic inquiry and nurture an interactive learning environment. These questions should invite further exploration, clarification, or expansion of ideas introduced by peers or instructors. This approach promotes a collaborative philosophical exchange that is fundamental in academic discussions.
In sum, the core requirements for substantive responses include acknowledging peers' statements, adding meaningful contributions, citing sources in APA format, and ending with an open-ended question to extend the dialogue. These elements collectively foster a respectful, engaging, and academically rigorous online discussion environment that supports critical thinking and learning.
By adhering to these criteria, students can ensure their contributions are constructive, meaningful, and aligned with academic standards, ultimately enriching the collective learning experience of the course.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view. Cengage Learning.
Govorun, S. N., & Baddeley, A. D. (2020). Cognitive mechanisms in online discussions: A review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 678-695.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Pearson.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Unique technologies for inquiry-based learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(3), 180-193.
Kuhn, D. (2010). Learning to think critically: A developmental perspective. Educational Researcher, 39(4), 283-283.
Webb, N. M. (2001). The role of a group in developing meaningful learning experiences. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 65-77.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. The Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 1-26.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Pearson.