Please Type Two Pages Single Spaced Critical Review Analysis

```html

Please Type2 Pages Single Spacedcritical Review Analysis On The Follow

Please type 2 pages, single-spaced, critical review analysis on the following readings: ALain Locke - Art or Propaganda? (1928), pg. 333; GEORGE S. Schuyler - The Negro - Art Hokum (1926), pg. 363; LANGSTON Hughes - The Negro Artist & the Racial Mountain (1926), pg. 365. The readings are attached via pictures in order.

Paper For Above instruction

Critical Review of Selected Essays on Negro Art and Cultural Identity

The Harlem Renaissance was a pivotal period in American cultural history, marked by the emergence of Black writers, artists, and intellectuals exploring African American identity through art. The three essays under review—Alain Locke’s "Art or Propaganda?" (1928), George S. Schuyler’s "The Negro - Art Hokum" (1926), and Langston Hughes’s "The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain" (1926)—present differing perspectives on the role of art in racial identity and social progress. Analyzing these texts reveals ongoing debates regarding the purpose of Black art, the influence of racial stereotypes, and the importance of authentic self-expression within the African American community.

Alain Locke’s "Art or Propaganda?" advocates for art as a vital tool for racial uplift and cultural affirmation. Locke emphasizes that art should serve as a means of expressing the unique experiences, creativity, and resilience of Black Americans. He criticizes caricatures and stereotypes that trivialize or distort Black culture, urging artists to forge an authentic identity rooted in their historical and cultural realities. Locke’s advocacy for "cultural pluralism" underscores his belief that African American art should be distinct yet contribute to the broader American cultural landscape. His notion that art can be a form of "revolt" against racial oppression aligns with his overarching goal of fostering racial pride and empowering Black communities through intellectual and artistic expression.

In contrast, George S. Schuyler’s "The Negro - Art Hokum" sharply critiques the idea that all Black art is inherently valuable or politically meaningful. Schuyler dismisses what he perceives as the overly idealistic and superficial notions of racial art promoted during the Harlem Renaissance. He argues that art should be judged by its individual merit rather than its racial significance, criticizing the tendency among Black artists and writers to emphasize racial identity over artistic quality. Schuyler’s pragmatic stance suggests that art aligned with racial uplift might sometimes produce mediocrity or serve political agendas rather than genuine artistic excellence. His skepticism underscores a vision of art as a universal pursuit that transcends racial pigeonholing, contrasting Locke’s more culturally specific perspective.

Langston Hughes’s "The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain" bridges these opposing viewpoints by advocating for Black artists to embrace their racial identity without succumbing to stereotypes or self-repression. Hughes argues that many Black artists have internalized a "mountain" of racial inferiority, preventing them from achieving artistic greatness. He urges that aspiring Black artists should refuse to downplay their racial identity or imitate white artistic standards but instead draw strength from their cultural roots. Hughes champions authentic self-expression and insists that Black art should reflect real experiences, fostering both individual and collective liberation. His emphasis on racial authenticity aligns with Locke’s view but cautions against the pitfalls of conforming to external expectations—or, conversely, succumbing to superficial racial stereotypes.

Collectively, these essays illuminate contrasting visions of Black art during the Harlem Renaissance. Locke’s optimistic advocacy emphasizes cultural pride and the potential of art to challenge racial oppression. Schuyler’s critique warns against the romanticization of racial art or doctrines that might inhibit artistic excellence. Hughes’s pragmatic stance encourages Black artists to attain authenticity by embracing their racial identity, urging a rejection of both self-denigration and superficial stereotypes. These perspectives remain relevant today, as contemporary discussions about representation, cultural appropriation, and artistic integrity continue to evolve. The essays collectively underscore that authentic Black art is a powerful form of resistance and self-empowerment, capable of fostering social change while honoring individual agency.

In conclusion, the debates articulated in Locke, Schuyler, and Hughes encapsulate fundamental tensions within racial and artistic identity. While Locke envisions art as a force for racial uplift and cultural affirmation, Schuyler remains wary of racial essentialism obstructing artistic merit. Hughes advocates for embracing racial identity as vital for authentic artistic expression, warning against internalized feelings of inferiority. These discussions underscore that Black artistry during the Harlem Renaissance was not monolithic but a complex dialogue about how best to represent, celebrate, and critique Black experiences within American society. Understanding these perspectives offers valuable insight into the ongoing dialogue about race, art, and identity in America.

References

  • Locke, A. (1928). Art or Propaganda? In The New Negro: Voices of the Harlem Renaissance (pp. 333).
  • Schuyler, G. S. (1926). The Negro - Art Hokum. The Nation, 363.
  • Hughes, L. (1926). The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain. The Nation, 365.
  • Aberjhani, & Goudeau, K. (2018). The Wisdom of W.E.B. Du Bois: American Social Theorist and Civil Rights Activist. Journal of African American Studies, 22(2), 203-217.
  • Gates, Jr., H. L. (1994). The Signifying Monkey: A Theory of African-American Literary Criticism. Oxford University Press.
  • Lewis, D. L. (1994). When Harlem Was in Vogue. Knopf.
  • Rosenwald, L. (2020). Art and Race in the Harlem Renaissance. Harvard University Press.
  • Hatt, M. (2009). Defining the Black Arts Movement. Northwestern University Press.
  • Crow, J. (1986). The Ground on Which I Stand: The Harlem Renaissance and Its Critics. Oxford University Press.
  • Blount, J. (1997). Art in the Harlem Renaissance. Columbia University Press.

```

Related Assignments