Please Use Your Own Thoughts And Do Not Plagiarize Anyone's
Please Use Your Own Thoughts And Do Not Plagiarize Anyones Work All
Please use your own thoughts and do NOT plagiarize anyone's work. All assignments will be run through Safe Assign (plagiarism software for Blackboard use). Discussion Board Evaluation Criteria: write a post of 350 words or more on a topic from the chapter. The original post must be submitted every Saturday by 6:00 p.m. EST. Then, post one additional response to your classmates over the next few days. Discussion board assignments are opportunities to share your knowledge, experience, and opinions with the class. They also serve as a proxy for attendance.
The items I am looking for are relevance to the topic, promptness in the initial posting and response, clear expression of opinions, good spelling and grammar, and polite disagreement when appropriate. Please use good grammar and make coherent points. When providing a contrasting viewpoint, focus on making your point, not on deriding the other person's point. Create one original post by you, followed by three additional meaningful responses to other students' posts.
Paper For Above instruction
Discussion board assignments serve as a crucial component of online courses, allowing students to engage actively with the material and with each other. In this context, students are encouraged to produce original content that reflects their understanding, opinions, and experiences related to the chapter topics. Emphasizing the importance of academic integrity, students are instructed to avoid plagiarism by using their own words and ideas, with all submissions to be checked via SafeAssign.
Effective participation entails timely submission of the initial post—every Saturday by 6:00 p.m. EST—followed by thoughtful responses to peers. This not only enhances learning but also provides a measure of participation, akin to attendance in traditional classrooms. Quality contributions depend on relevance, clarity, and respectful communication, including polite disagreement. When differing opinions are expressed, they should be articulated with sensitivity and a focus on the ideas rather than personal disparagement.
In crafting posts, students must aim for clarity, coherence, and proper grammar, ensuring their points are easily understood. The initial post should demonstrate critical thinking about the chapter material, integrating personal insights and applicable experiences. Responses to classmates should extend the discussion, pose constructive questions, or offer alternative viewpoints respectfully. Together, these activities foster a dynamic learning environment where diverse perspectives are acknowledged and valued.
The process of participating in discussion boards enhances comprehension of course content, promotes critical analysis, and develops communication skills. Consistent, meaningful engagement also reflects responsibility and commitment to the learning community. Therefore, students should approach these assignments seriously, ensuring their contributions are substantive, timely, and respectful, ultimately enriching the collective educational experience.
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA Publishing.
Johnson, R., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. Jossey-Bass.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education.
Dennen, V. P., & Wieland, K. (2017). Facilitating critical thinking in online discussions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching.
Hiltz, S. R. (1998). VastWaves: A social framework for the study of electronic communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Zhao, Y., & Kuh, G. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115-138.