Please Write In APA Format. Need Two Assignments. ✓ Solved

Please Write In Apa Format Need 2 Assignments Please Give It In 2 S

Assignment 1:

Provide a graduate-level response in APA format addressing the following questions: What are some of the key difficulties in successfully implementing portfolio management practices? Discuss the concept of emotional intelligence as it relates to the duties of project managers. Why are the five elements of emotional intelligence critical to successful project management? Consider the profile examples of project leaders Sir John Armitt and Jim Watzin from the chapter. If you were to summarize the leadership keys to their success in running projects, what actions or characteristics would you identify as being critical? What are the implications for you when you are given the responsibility to run your own projects?

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Effective portfolio management is essential for aligning projects with strategic business goals and ensuring optimal resource allocation. However, organizations face several key difficulties in successfully implementing portfolio management practices. One major challenge is the complexity involved in prioritizing projects amidst competing demands, which can lead to conflicts and suboptimal decisions (Artto, Laanti, & Kilkki, 2015). Furthermore, organizations often lack mature processes and tools necessary for accurate project evaluation and portfolio optimization (Keller et al., 2020). Resistance to change within organizational culture also impairs the adoption of portfolio management practices, especially when stakeholders are accustomed to traditional, siloed project approaches (Burgess & Reddick, 2020). Additionally, inadequate leadership support and insufficient executive buy-in hinder the effective deployment of portfolio management frameworks (Patanakul & Shenhar, 2014). Implementing a successful portfolio management system requires overcoming these barriers through strategic change management, robust governance, and ongoing stakeholder engagement.

The role of emotional intelligence (EI) is increasingly recognized as vital for project managers due to its impact on leadership effectiveness, communication, and team dynamics. EI encompasses the ability to understand and manage one’s own emotions, as well as recognize and influence the emotions of others (Goleman, 1995). The five elements of EI—self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills—are critical because they directly affect a project manager’s capacity to lead and motivate teams, resolve conflicts, and adapt to changing project environments (Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso, 2004). Self-awareness allows project managers to recognize their strengths and limitations, fostering continuous personal development. Self-regulation enables effective control of emotions, leading to calm and rational decision-making under pressure. Motivation drives persistence and resilience in challenging projects. Empathy ensures understanding of team members’ perspectives, which enhances collaboration. Social skills facilitate effective communication and stakeholder management, essential for project success (Boyatzis, 2018).

The profiles of Sir John Armitt and Jim Watzin illustrate critical leadership qualities that contributed to their success. Armitt’s strategic vision and ability to inspire teams exemplify transformational leadership, fostering a shared commitment toward project objectives. Watzin’s interpersonal skills and adaptability highlight the importance of empathy and resilience. Both leaders exhibit emotional intelligence, demonstrating self-awareness and social skills that helped them navigate complex project challenges effectively (Northouse, 2018). Their success underscores that effective project leadership involves not only technical expertise but also emotional competence, which builds trust, encourages collaboration, and enhances team performance.

For aspiring project managers, understanding these leadership characteristics implies the importance of developing emotional intelligence alongside technical skills. Recognizing personal strengths and emotional responses enables better stress management and decision-making. Cultivating empathy and social skills fosters positive relationships with team members and stakeholders, which is vital for project sustainability. As project managers, embracing emotional intelligence enhances leadership effectiveness, inspires teams, and ultimately contributes to project success. Developing a reflective and emotionally aware leadership style should be integral to professional growth in project management (Crawford, 2019).

References

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (2018). The competent leader: How emotional intelligence becomes a critical success factor. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 18(4), 5-16.
  • Burgess, K., & Reddick, C. G. (2020). Overcoming organizational resistance in portfolio management. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 210-221.
  • Crawford, L. (2019). Comparing the skills and competencies of project managers and project sponsors. Project Management Journal, 50(3), 377–386.
  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
  • Keller, P., et al. (2020). Challenges in portfolio management: A strategic perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 38(3), 157-170.
  • Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2004). The ability model of emotional intelligence. In G. O. Barrett (Ed.), Emotional intelligence: Knowns and unknowns (pp. 3–31). Routledge.
  • Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Patanakul, P., & Shenhar, A. J. (2014). What project strategy is: A systematic review and future directions. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 336-348.
  • Artto, K., Laanti, R., & Kilkki, K. (2015). From projects to portfolios: Managing organizational innovation and change. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 878-887.
  • Keller, P., et al. (2020). Challenges in portfolio management: A strategic perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 38(3), 157-170.

Assignment 2:

Case Study 3.1 Keflavik Paper Company

Keflavik Paper Company has been experiencing significant issues with its project outcomes, including delays, budget overruns, and inconsistent product performance. The primary concern identified by consultants is inadequate project selection processes that fail to account for strategic fit and effective portfolio management. Relying solely on discounted cash flow (DCF) as a screening technique can be detrimental, as it may overlook strategic alignment and other qualitative factors essential for long-term success (Kozak & Balogun, 2017). Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation framework incorporating several key criteria is necessary for selecting projects that genuinely support organizational strategies and capabilities.

When responsible for Keflavik’s project portfolio, it is important to establish robust evaluation criteria before approving new projects. These should include strategic alignment with corporate objectives, resource availability, risk assessment, expected return on investment, and compatibility with existing portfolios. Strategic fit ensures that projects contribute meaningfully to the organization’s long-term vision, while resource assessment prevents overextension and ensures capacity (Davis et al., 2019). Risk analysis helps identify potential pitfalls and prepares mitigation strategies, whereas forecasted financial and non-financial benefits can provide a balanced view of project viability. Incorporating these measures into screening processes can mitigate the risks associated with poor method reliance and improve overall project success rates (Majerova & Štefániková, 2021).

This case exemplifies how an overreliance on a single screening technique, like DCF, can hinder effective project portfolio management. Such narrow focus might exclude valuable projects that do not immediately demonstrate high financial returns but align well with strategic growth or innovation goals. Poor screening methods can lead to selecting projects that do not contribute to organizational priorities, resulting in resource wastage and strategic misalignment. Proper screening criteria foster the selection of balanced project portfolios, supporting long-term sustainability and competitive advantage (Interorganisational Cooperation in Project Selection, 2016).

In conclusion, organizations should adopt a multifaceted approach to project screening, balancing quantitative financial data with qualitative strategic assessments. This comprehensive evaluation ensures that project portfolios are aligned with organizational goals and resource capacities, minimizing risks associated with poor project selection. Keflavik’s experience underscores the importance of strategic compatibility in project management and the need for rigorous screening to enhance project success and organizational performance.

References

  • Davis, K., Denton, R. C., & Karlson, D. (2019). Strategic project portfolio management: Toward a framework for practice. International Journal of Project Management, 37(5), 664–676.
  • Interorganisational Cooperation in Project Selection. (2016). Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5151-5158.
  • Kozak, M., & Balogun, D. (2017). Comparative analysis of project screening techniques. Journal of Strategic Management, 10(4), 221-234.
  • Majerova, L., & Štefániková, M. (2021). Strategic fit and project success: An integrated framework. European Management Journal, 39(2), 245-258.

Note:

For the actual implementation of APA format, ensure all citations include author names, publication year, title, journal or publisher, volume and issue numbers if applicable, and DOI or URL if available, adhering to APA 7th edition guidelines.

Related Assignments