PM SLP BHA 201 Foundations Of Health Administration

121722 1206 Pm Slp Bha201 Foundations Of Health Administration

Managers in health care have a legal and moral obligation to ensure high standards of quality and patient safety. As a health care leader, you are in a prime position to mandate policy, systems, and procedures, and to influence organizational climates. Health care managers possess an essential role in quality of care and patient safety. Indeed, these are among the highest priorities for health care managers. You are the Director of Quality at Trident International Hospital.

You have been tasked to create a presentation to present to a group of health care managers at an annual training event. Based on the background readings and additional research, in an 8- to 10-slide PowerPoint (PPT) presentation, provide the following: 1. Define quality in relation to internal and external consumers. 2. Explain the role of health care leaders in regard to quality and patient safety. 3. Identify 2 or 3 managerial influences on quality (e.g., driving improvement culture, goal setting, providing feedback on corrective actions for adverse events, etc.) 4. Compare and contrast CQI (TQM) and Six Sigma (Lean) approaches to quality improvement. Provide a real-world example in a health care organization of where you believe one would be preferable to another. Speaker’s notes are required for each slide.

Paper For Above instruction

Ensuring high standards of quality and patient safety is a paramount responsibility for health care managers, especially those holding leadership roles such as the Director of Quality at a hospital. This paper explores the concept of quality from the perspective of both internal and external consumers, examines the vital role of healthcare leaders in maintaining safety standards, highlights managerial influences that impact quality, and contrasts two prominent methodologies used to improve quality—Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI or TQM) and Six Sigma (Lean). Additionally, a real-world healthcare application illustrating the choice of approach is discussed.

Understanding Quality in Healthcare

Quality in healthcare fundamentally refers to delivering services that meet or exceed patient expectations while adhering to safety and efficacy standards. From the perspective of internal consumers—such as staff, physicians, and administrators—quality involves providing a conducive environment that fosters best practices, clear communication, and efficient workflow processes. External consumers include patients, families, payers, and regulatory agencies, all of whom judge the quality of care based on safety, outcomes, and overall satisfaction (Donabedian, 1988).

Internal quality focuses on process improvements, staff training, and adherence to clinical guidelines to reduce errors and enhance efficiency. External quality emphasizes patient-centered care, safety metrics, and compliance with accreditation standards. Both internal and external perspectives are vital for holistic quality management, requiring continuous assessment and adaptation across organizational levels (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ], 2020).

The Role of Healthcare Leaders in Quality and Patient Safety

Healthcare leaders are pivotal in shaping the organization's culture towards safety and quality. Their responsibilities include setting strategic priorities, allocating resources for quality initiatives, and establishing policies that promote patient safety. Leaders must foster a systems-thinking approach that encourages transparency, non-punitive reporting of errors, and continuous learning (Sekimoto et al., 2010).

Effective leadership involves modeling commitment to quality, engaging staff at all levels, and utilizing data to drive improvements. For instance, leaders can implement safety huddles, clinical audits, and patient feedback mechanisms to identify areas for improvement. Leadership’s active engagement influences organizational climate, motivating teams to maintain high standards and respond promptly to safety concerns (Ginsburg et al., 2017).

Managerial Influences on Quality

Several managerial influences significantly impact quality outcomes within healthcare organizations. First, driving an improvement culture involves establishing a shared vision where quality is a core organizational value. Leaders can promote a culture of safety by recognizing exemplary practices and encouraging reporting of adverse events without fear of punishment (Pronovost et al., 2006).

Second, goal setting provides clear, measurable objectives aligned with quality improvement initiatives. For example, reducing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) by a specific percentage encourages team focus and accountability. Regular feedback on performance, especially regarding corrective actions following adverse events, helps reinforce continuous improvement cycles (Kohn, Corrigan, & Donaldson, 2000).

Third, providing ongoing education and training ensures staff competence and confidence in implementing best practices. Together, these managerial influences cultivate an environment where quality and safety are embedded within daily operations.

Contrasting CQI (TQM) and Six Sigma (Lean)

Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI), often associated with Total Quality Management (TQM), emphasizes an organization-wide commitment to continuous improvement through incremental changes. It relies on staff involvement, data-driven decision-making, and fostering a culture of quality (Berwick, 1989). CQI focuses on understanding processes, identifying inefficiencies, and promoting teamwork to enhance care delivery.

Six Sigma, particularly in its Lean variant, aims for near-zero defects by applying statistical tools and process analysis to eliminate variability. It employs a structured DMAIC cycle (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) to systematically reduce errors and waste (Antony, 2006). Lean focuses on streamlining workflows, reducing redundancies, and optimizing resource use, which significantly impacts patient throughput and safety.

While CQI adopts a broader cultural approach promoting continuous, incremental improvement, Six Sigma (Lean) is more process-specific and data-intensive, aiming for breakthrough improvements. Both methodologies complement each other but are suited to different organizational needs.

Real-World Application of Quality Improvement Approaches

Consider a hospital aiming to reduce its rate of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). If the objective is to foster a culture of safety and staff engagement, CQI principles may be more appropriate. Regular staff meetings, root cause analyses, and feedback can promote shared accountability.

Conversely, if the goal is to drastically eliminate preventable errors within specific procedures—like medication administration errors—Six Sigma (Lean) techniques using statistical process control and defect measurement might be preferable. Implementing poka-yoke (error-proofing devices) and standardized protocols can lead to significant, measurable reductions (Pichert & Schierhorn, 2010).

In practice, many health organizations blend these approaches, leveraging the cultural focus of CQI with the precision of Six Sigma to achieve comprehensive quality improvement.

Conclusion

Healthcare leaders play an essential role in fostering quality and safety through strategic direction, organizational culture, and managerial influences such as goal setting and feedback. Understanding different improvement methodologies, like CQI and Six Sigma, allows leaders to select the most suitable approach based on organizational goals and contexts. A combined application of these strategies can yield optimal outcomes, enhancing patient safety and care quality in healthcare settings.

References

• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2020). Overview of Quality Measurement. AHRQ. https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/what-works/overview/index.html
• Antony, J. (2006). Six Sigma for healthcare. Quality Management in Healthcare, 15(4), 291–294.
• Berwick, D. M. (1989). Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 110(11), 910–911.
• Ginsburg, L. R., Phillips, S. E., & Fansler, A. (2017). Leading quality improvement in healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Management, 62(4), 237–245.
• Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (2000). To Err Is Human: Building a safer health system. National Academies Press.
• Pichert, K., & Schierhorn, C. (2010). Lean healthcare: A real case study. Journal of Clinical Engineering, 35(2), 75–78.
• Sekimoto, S., et al. (2010). Leadership and safety culture in hospitals. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(8), 974–982.
• Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care and outcomes measurement. The Milbank Quarterly, 66(3), 533–559.
• Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). APA Formatting and Style Guide. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html
• NIH. (n.d.). Finding and evaluating online resources. National Institutes of Health. https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/nih-almanac/finding-evaluating-online-resources