Points 100 Homework Set 5 Chapter 12 Criteria Unacceptable

Points 100 Homework Set 5 Chapter 12criteria Unacceptable Below 70

Points: 100 Homework Set 5: Chapter 12 Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100%A 1. Clear explanation of each question. Each question is supported with evidence and/or calculations. Weight: 45% Did not submit or incompletely explain each question with supporting evidence and/or calculations. Partially explained each question with supporting evidence and/or calculations. Satisfactorily explained each question with supporting evidence and/or calculations. Thoroughly explained each question with supporting evidence and/or calculations. 2. Descriptions and conclusions are in alignment with course objectives. Weight: 45% Did not submit or incompletely provided descriptions and conclusions that were in alignment with course objectives. Partially provided descriptions and conclusions that were in alignment with course objectives. Satisfactorily provided descriptions and conclusions that were in alignment with course objectives. Thoroughly provided descriptions and conclusions that were in alignment with course objectives. 3. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. Weight: 10% More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present RESEARCH METHODS CLASS 3 PAGES EACH!!! UNITS I, II, III AND IV

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment involves completing a comprehensive homework set based on Chapter 12, emphasizing research methods. This task requires clear, evidence-supported explanations for each question, ensuring alignment with course objectives, and adherence to proper writing mechanics and formatting. To systematically approach this assignment, diligent attention must be paid to the clarity of responses, the depth of evidence provided, and the coherence of conclusions with established learning goals.

In research methods, clarity in explaining concepts, implementing accurate calculations, and providing robust evidence are fundamental. For example, when addressing specific questions related to research design, data collection, or analysis techniques, it is crucial to present step-by-step reasoning and cite relevant literature or statistical results to substantiate claims. This detailed support not only demonstrates understanding but also enhances the credibility of the responses. Errors in mechanics or formatting should be minimized to meet the highest standards, aiming for no more than two mistakes to secure exemplary marks.

Alignment with course objectives is paramount. Descriptions and conclusions must reflect what has been emphasized throughout the course modules, such as ethical considerations, methodological rigor, and the importance of valid data interpretation. Partial or incomplete submissions will result in lower grades, emphasizing the need for comprehensive and well-organized content. Structuring answers to clearly delineate each question and integrating relevant course concepts will aid in achieving proficient or exemplary levels.

Given the requirement for three pages per unit across four units, the homework should thoroughly address key topics in research methodology. These might include research design, sampling strategies, data collection methods, analysis procedures, and ethical considerations. Each unit should be approached with detailed explanations, supported by appropriate references, and formatted according to academic standards. Proper editing for mechanics and clarity will ensure the submission meets the criteria for high grading.

References

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  • Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Practical research: Planning and design. Pearson.
  • Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research. Cengage Learning.
  • Robson, C. (2011). Real world research. Wiley.
  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage publications.
  • Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry.
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage publications.
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Related Assignments