Points 20 Week 5 Discussion Are You Sitting On A Million Dol

Sheet1Points20Week5DiscussionAreYouSittingOnAMillionDollar

Critically evaluate the assignment which requires creating a video presentation about a product you would like to see revamped or created from scratch, including a detailed description of the changes and the target market. The assignment also involves uploading the video via Kaltura, responding substantively to peers’ discussions, and demonstrating an understanding of relevant concepts. The grading criteria consider the clarity and quality of the video, the depth of explanation, the segmentation of target market, the engagement with peers through meaningful responses, and the ability to extend the discussion with additional insights or examples.

Paper For Above instruction

In the contemporary landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship, the ability to identify and develop a unique product idea is crucial. The assignment prompts students to craft a comprehensive presentation of a product they wish to reinvent or create anew, emphasizing not only the conceptual aspects but also the strategic thinking involved in market segmentation and communication. This process involves multiple steps, including the creation of an engaging video, the careful explanation of the proposed changes, and active participation in peer discussions, all of which are vital to cultivating entrepreneurial skills.

Initially, students are required to produce a video that visually and verbally demonstrates their proposed product innovation. The effectiveness of the video hinges on clarity, quality, and adherence to technical standards, ensuring that the audience clearly understands the product idea. The video should be shot using mobile-compatible formats like MP4, avoiding slow processing or poor audio-visual quality. This visual communication is critical because it allows for a concise yet comprehensive presentation of the product concept, highlighting specific features or modifications that make the idea compelling.

Beyond merely showcasing the product, students must identify and articulate the target market for their new creation. A critical aspect of this task is to segment the market intentionally rather than assuming an undifferentiated audience. Explaining why a particular segment would benefit most from the product demonstrates analytical thinking and an understanding of consumer needs. For example, if the product is a technological gadget, the student might specify a segment such as young professionals or tech enthusiasts, providing rationale based on preferences, behaviors, or demographic characteristics.

The assignment also emphasizes active engagement through responses to peers' posts. This involves more than superficial agreement or summary; responses should be substantive, offering additional insights, alternative viewpoints, or real-life examples to deepen the discussion. Constructive feedback and follow-up questions foster a collaborative learning environment and illustrate proficiency in applying theoretical concepts to practical scenarios. Responding with comprehensive, well-developed comments helps to enhance critical thinking and supports a richer peer learning experience.

Overall, this assignment combines visual communication, strategic market segmentation, and collaborative discussion to develop key entrepreneurial competencies. Students learn to clearly articulate innovative ideas, fundament their market choices, and engage critically with others, skills that are essential for launching successful ventures. Furthermore, the task underscores the importance of technical quality in multimedia presentations and the value of meaningful peer interaction for continuous improvement and idea refinement.

References

• Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Creates New Alternatives for Business and Society. HarperBusiness.
• Keller, K. L. (2013). Strategic Brand Management (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
• McAdam, R., & McClelland, J. (2009). The process of innovation: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(3), 277-308.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
• Sydow, J. (2010). Strategy-as-practice: A review and future research directions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 41-65.
• Thompson, A. A., Peteraf, M. A., Gamble, J. E., & Strickland III, A. J. (2018). Crafting and Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ulwick, A. W. (2002). Turn customer input into innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 91-97.
• Whetten, D. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2011). Developing Management Skills. Pearson.
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
• Zhao, Y., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259-271.