Points 75 Assignment 3: Incident Response And Strategic Deci

Points 75assignment 3 Incident Response Ir Strategic Decisionscrit

Points 75 assignment 3 Incident Response (IR) Strategic Decisions Criteria Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Explain in detail the initial steps that would need to be made by you and the IR team in order to respond to this potential incident. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely explained in detail the initial steps that would need to be made by you and the IR team in order to respond to this potential incident. Insufficiently explained in detail the initial steps that would need to be made by you and the IR team in order to respond to this potential incident. Partially explained in detail the initial steps that would need to be made by you and the IR team in order to respond to this potential incident. Satisfactorily explained in detail the initial steps that would need to be made by you and the IR team in order to respond to this potential incident. Thoroughly explained in detail the initial steps that would need to be made by you and the IR team in order to respond to this potential incident. 2. Construct a process-flow diagram that illustrates the process of determining the incident containment strategy that would be used in this scenario, and identify which containment strategy would be appropriate in this case, through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely constructed a process-flow diagram that illustrates the process of determining the incident containment strategy that would be used in this scenario, and did not submit or incompletely identified which containment strategy would be appropriate in this case, through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Insufficiently constructed a process-flow diagram that illustrates the process of determining the incident containment strategy that would be used in this scenario, and insufficiently identified which containment strategy would be appropriate in this case, through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Partially constructed a process-flow diagram that illustrates the process of determining the incident containment strategy that would be used in this scenario, and partially identified which containment strategy would be appropriate in this case, through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Satisfactorily constructed a process-flow diagram that illustrates the process of determining the incident containment strategy that would be used in this scenario, and satisfactorily identified which containment strategy would be appropriate in this case, through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Thoroughly constructed a process-flow diagram that illustrates the process of determining the incident containment strategy that would be used in this scenario, and thoroughly identified which containment strategy would be appropriate in this case, through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. 3. Construct a process flow diagram to illustrate the process(es) for determining if / when notification of the incident should be relayed to upper management, and explain how those communications should be structured and relayed through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletelyconstructed a process flow diagram to illustrate the process(es) for determining if / when notification of the incident should be relayed to upper management, and did not submit or incompletely explained how those communications should be structured and relayed through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Insufficiently constructed a process flow diagram to illustrate the process(es) for determining if / when notification of the incident should be relayed to upper management, and insufficiently explained how those communications should be structured and relayed through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Partially constructed a process flow diagram to illustrate the process(es) for determining if / when notification of the incident should be relayed to upper management, and partially explained how those communications should be structured and relayed through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Satisfactorily constructed a process flow diagram to illustrate the process(es) for determining if / when notification of the incident should be relayed to upper management, and satisfactorily explained how those communications should be structured and relayed through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Th rooughly constructed a process flow diagram to illustrate the process(es) for determining if / when notification of the incident should be relayed to upper management, and thoroughly explained how those communications should be structured and relayed through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. 4. Detail the incident recovery processes for the resolution of this incident. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely detailed the incident recovery processes for the resolution of this incident. Insufficiently detailed the incident recovery processes for the resolution of this incident. Partially detailed the incident recovery processes for the resolution of this incident. Satisfactorily detailed the incident recovery processes for the resolution of this incident. Thoroughly detailed the incident recovery processes for the resolution of this incident. 5. 6 references Weight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 8 errors present 7-8 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present