Pol 1101: American Government First Paper Submission ✓ Solved

Pol 1101: American Government First Paper (Must be submitted via Turniti

Pol 1101: American Government First Paper (Must be submitted via Turnitin link on Blackboard) About 3-4 pages (double-spaced, 12-pt Times New Roman) Federalism is undoubtedly one of the key features of the American government. Like any other fundamental feature of government, written law (especially in the Constitution) does not comprehensively determine the distribution of power between the central government and states. This distribution of power evolves over time, and depends on the policy issue. Assignment: Pick a policy issue (other than marijuana legalization or transportation funding, as in the assigned reading). Critically argue whether the states or the federal government are better placed to take primary responsibility for that issue.

By this, I mean that you should think about (to the extent applicable for your case): who should be responsible for funding? Who should be responsible for determining the rules? In general, how autonomous (or independent) do you think states should be from the federal government? You should start your paper by summarizing some of the ways that both the federal government and state governments are involved in this policy issue you choose. This is not a full-scale research paper, but you should still include hyperlinks or basic citations for your claims. This means you should have a basic bibliography at the end, but I’m not picky about how it is formatted as long as it is clear where you are getting information from.

If you would like some guidance on what kinds of sources make sense, feel free to ask me. The following are good places to look: news articles, academic articles/book chapters that discuss the policy issue you have in mind (these can be found using JSTOR, Google Scholar, or other sites). Your Baruch library login gives you access to many of these kinds of sources. How much you choose to rely on each type of source is entirely up to you. For those of you who are political science majors (or even if you just anticipate writing more robust papers in the future), I encourage you to try to rely more on academic sources. Please note that the following are not good sources: Wikipedia, websites that are clearly biased opinion sites or blogs, unrobust statistical aggregator sites like Statista (if you have a source you’re unsure about, let me know).

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Title: Federalism and Public Health Policy: The Role of States versus the Federal Government

Introduction

Federalism, a foundational characteristic of the United States government, entails a division of powers and responsibilities between the national and state governments. This distribution allows flexibility and localized control, but it also raises questions about which level of government should lead on specific policy issues. In the context of public health, particularly vaccination policies, this division becomes particularly salient. This paper critically assesses whether states or the federal government are better positioned to take primary responsibility for public health initiatives, focusing on vaccination mandates as a key example.

Involvement of Federal and State Governments

The federal government, through agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), provides overarching guidance, funding, and coordination for vaccination programs. It establishes national standards and emergency responses, especially evident during outbreaks like the H1N1 or COVID-19 pandemics. Conversely, states have the authority to implement and enforce vaccination laws, including deciding which vaccines are mandatory for school entry and other public settings. State health departments adapt federal guidelines to local contexts, and enforcement varies across states, reflecting their autonomous policymaking capacity.

Assessment of Responsibility in Vaccination Policy

Responsibility for funding vaccination efforts is predominantly shared. The federal government allocates significant funding for vaccine development, procurement, and distribution, especially during pandemics. States, however, often bear the costs of administering vaccines and enforcing laws. The determination of rules tends to lean toward states, given their constitutional authority over public health and education. States decide on vaccine exemptions, mandates, and enforcement policies, thus playing a crucial role in shaping vaccination coverage and public compliance.

Autonomy and Federal Oversight

The degree of state autonomy varies depending on the policy context. In vaccination policy, states enjoy broad discretion, which enables tailored approaches that consider local epidemiological conditions. However, federal oversight ensures consistency and addresses national interest in disease prevention and control. During health crises, federal authority often expands, as seen with the Declaration of Public Health Emergencies, which grants the federal government additional powers to coordinate responses and allocate resources. Overall, a balanced approach that respects state autonomy within a federal framework seems optimal for effective public health management.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both federal and state governments have vital roles in vaccination policy. While states possess significant authority to determine rules and adapt strategies to local needs, the federal government provides essential funding, guidance, and coordination. Given the public health implications and the need for a cohesive response to outbreaks, a collaborative approach leveraging the strengths of both levels of government appears most effective. This synergy ensures that vaccination policies are both locally responsive and nationally coordinated, ultimately safeguarding public health efficiently.

References

  • Gostin, L. O., & Hodge, J. G. (2020). US emergency legal responses to novel coronavirus: balancing public health and civil liberties. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 48(4), 543-548.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Vaccination and Immunization Policies. CDC.gov.
  • Jensen, L., & Phelan, A. (2021). State-level vaccine mandates and public health. American Journal of Public Health, 111(4), 564-570.
  • Krause, P. R., et al. (2020). COVID-19 vaccine development in the United States: State and federal roles. Vaccine, 38(36), 5681-5683.
  • Funk, C., & Pollard, K. (2020). America's evolving vaccine landscape. Pew Research Center.
  • National Conference of State Legislatures. (2022). State Immunization Laws and Policies. NCSL.org.
  • Stoto, M. A., et al. (2021). Harmonizing federal and state responses during public health emergencies. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, 27(2), 123-130.
  • Baker, R. S., et al. (2022). Federal and state coordination in pandemic response. Health Affairs, 41(3), 377-385.
  • Richards, S. E., & Johnson, P. J. (2019). The legal landscape of public health authority. Public Health Reports, 134(5), 557-565.
  • Orenstein, W. A., & Seib, K. (2021). Strategies for effective immunization programs. Vaccine, 39(15), 1933-1940.

Related Assignments