Policy Skills And Practice Resources Readings Plummer S B Ma

Policy Skills And Practiceresourcesreadings Plummer S B Makris S

Policy Skills and Practice Resources Readings • Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen S. M. (Eds.). (2014). Social work case studies: Foundation year. Baltimore: MD: Laureate International Universities Publishing. [Vital Source e- reader]. o “WorkingWith Survivors of Sexual Abuse and Trauma: The Case of Rita†(pp. 81–83) • Rome, S., Harris, S., & Hoechstetter, S. (2010). Social work and civic engagement: The political participation of professional social workers. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 37(3), 107–129. • Popple, P. R., & Leighninger, L. (2015). The policy-based profession: An introduction to social welfare policy analysis for social workers. (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. o Chapter 12, “Taking Action: Policy Practice for Social Workers†(pp. ) o Chapter 13, “Conclusion†(pp. ) • Plummer, S. -B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. (Eds.). (2014). Sessions: Case histories. Baltimore: MD: Laureate International Universities Publishing. [Vital Sourcee-reader]. o Part 1, "The Johnson Family" (pp. 11–13) Media • Laureate Education (Producer). (2013). Sessions: Johnson family (Episode 4 of 42) [Video file]. Retrieved from © 2017 Laureate Education, Inc.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Effective social work practice requires a comprehensive understanding of policy analysis, advocacy, and intervention strategies. This paper analyzes either “The Case of Rita” or “The Johnson Family,” proposing a specific policy change aimed at improving client outcomes. Additionally, the paper discusses evaluation methods to measure the success of these policy adjustments, leveraging insights from foundational texts and case studies provided in the course resources.

Analysis of the Case and Proposed Policy Change

For this analysis, I have selected “The Case of Rita,” a poignant example illustrating the intersection of trauma, social support, and policy frameworks. Rita, a survivor of sexual abuse, faces systemic barriers that hinder her recovery and access to essential services. Based on the case details, a significant policy change I would advocate involves enhancing confidentiality protections and expanding access to trauma-informed care within community-based social service agencies.

Currently, policies may inadequately protect survivors like Rita from stigma and breaches of privacy, which can discourage them from seeking necessary help (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014). A targeted policy revision should include stricter confidentiality protocols, mandatory staff training on trauma-informed approaches, and increased funding for specialized mental health services. Such modifications would bolster trust between survivors and social service providers, thereby facilitating ongoing engagement and recovery.

Implementing these policy changes aligns with frameworks discussed in Popple and Leighninger’s (2015) analysis, emphasizing the importance of advocacy and proactive policy practice for social workers. This approach also supports the principles of civic engagement highlighted by Rome et al. (2010), emphasizing the role of social workers as agents of systemic change in promoting social justice and client empowerment.

Evaluation of Policy Effectiveness

To assess the success of the proposed policy modifications, a mixed-methods evaluation strategy would be appropriate. Quantitatively, metrics such as increased utilization of trauma-related services, reduced reports of confidentiality breaches, and improved client outcomes (measured through standardized trauma assessments) could be monitored over time. Qualitatively, client surveys and interviews would offer insights into survivor perceptions of safety, trust, and satisfaction with services post-policy implementation.

Regular monitoring and reporting are essential to ensure policymakers and social service providers remain accountable and responsive to survivor needs (Plummer & Makris, 2014). An increase in survivors’ willingness to seek help and an observed shift toward trauma-informed practices within agencies would serve as indicators of successful policy change. Moreover, ongoing collaboration with community stakeholders can facilitate adaptive responses to emerging challenges, ensuring sustainable improvements (Popple & Leighninger, 2015).

Conclusion

In conclusion, adjusting policies related to confidentiality and trauma-informed care could significantly improve the experiences of survivors like Rita. A comprehensive evaluation framework incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data would allow stakeholders to measure the impact of these changes effectively. Embedding advocacy within social work practice as outlined in key literature enhances the capacity to enact meaningful policy reforms that promote social justice and client welfare.

References

• Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. M. (2014). Social work case studies: Foundation year. Laureate International Universities Publishing.
• Popple, P. R., & Leighninger, L. (2015). The policy-based profession: An introduction to social welfare policy analysis for social workers. Pearson.
• Rome, S., Harris, S., & Hoechstetter, S. (2010). Social work and civic engagement: The political participation of professional social workers. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 37(3), 107–129.
• Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. (2014). Sessions: Case histories. Laureate International Universities Publishing.
• Laureate Education (Producer). (2013). Sessions: Johnson family [Video].
• Gordon, S. (2017). Trauma-informed care in social work practices. Journal of Social Work Values & Ethics, 14(2), 45–56.
• Healy, K. (2014). Social work theories in context: Creating frameworks for practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Matthews, B., & Campbell, H. (2017). Policy change and social advocacy: Strategies for effective social work. Social Policy & Administration, 51(3), 473–488.
• Anthony, B., & Fitzgerald, C. (2016). Trauma-informed systems: A roadmap for social service agencies. Administration in Social Work, 40(3), 251–264.
• Reid, D., & Newton, T. (2018). Evaluating social policy impact: Methods and practices. Routledge.