Political Ambitions Vs. The Public Good: Analyze The Case ✓ Solved

Political Ambitions Versus the Public Good: Analyze the case

Analyze the case 'Political ambitions versus the public good' and answer the following questions:

1. What were the risks, benefits, and drawbacks of Manager Bradford's engaging so many people in the policymaking process?

2. Could the manager have influenced Lang's actions as chair of the task force?

3. What obligation does the manager have to implement the affordable housing strategy?

4. Is there anything Manager Bradford can do now to encourage the council to implement the recommendations of the affordable housing strategy?

5. Should the manager be proactive regarding the policy recommendations that have not been pursued?

6. What steps could the town manager take to build some agreement and support to protect tenants? What tools does he have at his disposal?

7. Mayor Lang will be in office for at least two more years. Should this fact play into Manager Bradford's decision making?

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

This analysis addresses the "Political Ambitions Versus the Public Good" case by answering seven targeted questions about Manager Bradford's actions, the dynamics with Mayor Lang, and the municipal obligations and tools related to an affordable housing strategy. The arguments draw on public administration theory about collaborative policymaking, managerial neutrality, and practical tools for policy implementation (Denhardt & Denhardt, 2015; Kettl, 2015).

1. Risks, Benefits, and Drawbacks of Broad Engagement

Engaging many stakeholders in policymaking can yield multiple benefits: richer information, enhanced legitimacy, and broader ownership of outcomes (Bryson, Crosby, & Stone, 2006). In Bradford’s case, broad engagement likely improved the technical quality and public acceptability of the affordable housing strategy, and built some cross-sector networks useful for implementation (Ostrom, 2010).

However, risks include delay, diffusion of accountability, and the potential for interest-driven capture. Wide engagement can create competing narratives and allow politically motivated actors to reframe policy debates for personal or electoral gain (Stone, 2012). The drawbacks for Bradford included reduced control over messaging and an opening for Mayor Lang or others to exploit participatory processes for political advantage, undermining coherent implementation (Rosenbloom, 2014).

2. Influence over Mayor Lang's Actions

A town manager wields both formal and informal influence but must respect political boundaries. Bradford could have shaped Lang’s behavior by structuring the task force process—setting clear charters, decision rules, and communication protocols—to limit unilateral agenda control and partisan framing (Svara, 1994). Through facilitation, framing of technical evidence, and by mobilizing coalition partners to publicly support specific elements, Bradford could have reduced opportunities for Lang to divert the task force (Bryson et al., 2006).

Nonetheless, direct coercion or overt political maneuvering by the manager would violate norms of administrative neutrality. Influence should therefore be procedural and evidence-based rather than partisan (Denhardt & Denhardt, 2015).

3. Managerial Obligation to Implement the Strategy

The obligation to implement the affordable housing strategy depends on the municipality’s governance structure and the relationship between the manager and elected council. A professional manager is obligated to advance council-approved policies and to advise on feasibility and resource needs (ICMA, 2013). If the strategy was formally adopted by the council, Bradford has a clear duty to implement it. Where the strategy is advisory, he still has an ethical and professional obligation to present implementation plans, cost estimates, and phased actions that translate recommendations into executable steps (Kettl, 2015).

4. Encouraging Council Adoption of Recommendations

Bradford can pursue multiple avenues to encourage council adoption: prepare an actionable implementation plan with cost-benefit analysis, identify funding sources (grants, bonds, public-private partnerships), and present pilot projects demonstrating viability (Peters, 2015). He can also convene stakeholders who supported the strategy to brief council members, elevating visible public backing and political incentives (Bryson et al., 2006). Transparent timelines and measurable metrics reduce uncertainty and make adoption politically easier for council members.

5. Proactivity on Unpursued Recommendations

The manager should be proactive in follow-through while observing the political line: provide options, implementation roadmaps, and regular progress reports to the council (Rosenbloom, 2014). Proactivity involves translating strategy into administratively feasible initiatives—pilots, zoning changes, or tenant protections—and seeking council direction rather than unilaterally implementing controversial measures. This balances managerial leadership with respect for democratic decision-making (Denhardt & Denhardt, 2015).

6. Building Agreement and Tenant Protections

To build consensus for tenant protections, Bradford can employ tools including stakeholder convenings, evidence briefs demonstrating housing instability impacts, and small-scale pilot programs (Bryson et al., 2006). Regulatory tools include proposing zoning incentives for affordable units, adjusting permitting streams, and recommending emergency tenant protections within legal limits. Financial tools include leveraging state/federal grants, creating housing trust funds, and incentivizing developers through density bonuses (NLIHC, 2020).

Administrative tools—standardized eviction diversion protocols, tenant outreach, and coordination with legal aid—can be pursued with minimal council resistance and demonstrate tangible benefits, making broader council buy-in more likely (Fainstein, 2010).

7. Should Mayor Lang’s Remaining Term Affect Decision Making?

Mayor Lang’s two-year term remaining is a political fact Bradford must acknowledge. It should inform strategy timing and engagement tactics but not override professional judgment. Bradford should avoid partisan actions tailored solely to the mayoral timeline; instead, he should prioritize durable, legally sound steps that build institutional capacity and public support regardless of electoral cycles (Svara, 1994). Tactical sequencing—pursuing noncontroversial quick wins while laying groundwork for longer-term reforms—aligns administrative prudence with political realities (Kettl, 2015).

Conclusion

Manager Bradford’s broad engagement produced useful inputs but increased political exposure. His legitimate influence is strongest when procedural, evidence-based, and collaborative. Bradford has professional obligations to facilitate implementation where the council has endorsed strategy elements and should proactively translate recommendations into administrable options while respecting elected authority. Tools available include regulatory proposals, funding mechanisms, pilots, stakeholder mobilization, and administrative reforms to protect tenants. Awareness of Mayor Lang’s remaining term should shape tactical timing but not compromise adherence to professional, ethical public administration principles (ICMA, 2013; Denhardt & Denhardt, 2015).

References

  • Kettl, D. F. (2015). The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for the Twenty-First Century. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Routledge.
  • Rosenbloom, D. H. (2014). Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law. McGraw-Hill.
  • Svara, J. H. (1994). Official Leadership in the City: Patterns of Conflict and Collaboration. Oxford University Press.
  • Stone, D. (2012). Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55.
  • Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.
  • Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The Just City. Cornell University Press.
  • National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC). (2020). The Gap: A Shortage of Affordable Homes. NLIHC Publications.
  • International City/County Management Association (ICMA). (2013). Ethics in Local Government: A Practical Guide. ICMA.

Related Assignments