Political Party And ANOVA Researchers Asked 180 US Students

Political Party And Anova Researchers Asked 180 US Students To Iden

political party and ANOVA: Researchers asked 180 U.S. students to identify their political viewpoint as most similar to that of the Republicans, most similar to that of the Democrats, or neither. All three groups then complete a religiosity scale. The researchers wondered whether political orientation affected levels of religiosity, a measure that assesses how religious one is, regardless of the specific religion with which a person identifies. a. What is the independent variable, and what are its levels? b. What is the dependent variable? c. What are the populations and what are the samples? d. Would you use a between-groups or within-groups ANOVA? Explain. e. Using this example, explain how you would calculate the F statistic.

Paper For Above instruction

The research study involves examining the relationship between political orientation and religiosity among U.S. college students. To analyze whether different political viewpoints are associated with different levels of religiosity, the study implements an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), a statistical method designed to compare means across multiple groups. This paper delineates the key variables involved, the populations and samples, the choice of ANOVA type, and the calculation of the F statistic, providing a comprehensive understanding of the research design and analysis process.

Independent Variable and Its Levels

The independent variable in this study is political orientation, which is manipulated to observe its potential effect on religiosity. Political orientation is a categorical variable, categorized into three distinct groups: individuals who identify as most similar to Republicans, those most similar to Democrats, and those who identify as neither. These groups serve as the independent variable's levels, representing different political viewpoints. The categorization allows researchers to compare religiosity levels across these distinct political identities, thereby assessing if political orientation influences religiosity.

Dependent Variable

The dependent variable is religiosity, which is measured using a religiosity scale. This scale quantifies how religious an individual is, regardless of religious affiliation. It might include aspects such as frequency of religious service attendance, prayer, religious beliefs, or personal importance of religion. Because religiosity is a continuous variable, it is suitable for comparison across the different political groups using ANOVA. The primary goal is to determine whether the mean religiosity scores differ significantly among the three political orientation groups.

Populations and Samples

The population of interest in this research comprises all U.S. college students, or potentially all young adults in the United States, depending on the scope defined by the researchers. The sample consists of the 180 students who participated in the study, selected through a sampling process that might involve random, stratified, or convenience sampling. The sample aims to represent the broader population to ensure generalizability of the findings. The representativeness of the sample is essential to infer whether political orientation influences religiosity across the larger population of U.S. students.

Type of ANOVA: Between-Groups or Within-Groups

This study employs a between-groups ANOVA, also known as an independent measures ANOVA. This choice is appropriate because the participants belong to one of three distinct political orientation groups, and each participant belongs exclusively to one group. The goal is to compare the average religiosity scores between these independent groups, rather than examining changes within the same participants over time or under different conditions. A within-groups ANOVA, which compares the same subjects across multiple conditions, would not be suitable here because participants do not belong to multiple groups or conditions.

Calculating the F Statistic Using This Example

The F statistic in an ANOVA assesses whether there are statistically significant differences between group means. The calculation involves partitioning the total variability in the data into variability between groups and within groups and then forming a ratio of these variances.

  1. Calculate the mean religiosity score for each group (Republicans, Democrats, Neither).
  2. Compute the overall mean religiosity score across all 180 students.
  3. Calculate the Sum of Squares Between Groups (SSB):
  4. \[
  5. SSB = \sum_{i=1}^{k} n_i (\bar{Y}_i - \bar{Y})^2
  6. \]
  7. where \( n_i \) is the number of participants in group \(i\), \( \bar{Y}_i \) is the mean religiosity score of group \(i\), and \( \bar{Y} \) is the overall mean.
  8. Calculate the Sum of Squares Within Groups (SSW):
  9. \[
  10. SSW = \sum_{i=1}^{k} \sum_{j=1}^{n_i} (Y_{ij} - \bar{Y}_i)^2
  11. \]
  12. where \( Y_{ij} \) is the religiosity score for individual \(j\) in group \(i\).
  13. Compute the mean squares by dividing the sums of squares by their respective degrees of freedom:
  14. \[
  15. MSB = \frac{SSB}{k - 1}
  16. \]
  17. \[
  18. MSW = \frac{SSW}{N - k}
  19. \]
  20. where \( k \) is the number of groups and \( N \) is total sample size.
  21. The F statistic is then calculated as:
  22. \[
  23. F = \frac{MSB}{MSW}
  24. \]
  25. A higher F value indicates greater differences among group means relative to variability within groups, which, if sufficiently large, suggests significant differences in religiosity across political orientations.

In conclusion, analyzing whether political orientation affects religiosity via ANOVA involves defining the independent and dependent variables clearly, understanding the population and sample context, choosing the correct type of ANOVA, and accurately calculating the F statistic to interpret the results. This process enables researchers to determine if political identity is associated with differing levels of religiosity among U.S. students.

References

  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage Publications.
  • Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2017). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Cengage Learning.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Wolters Kluwer.
  • Levine, G. M., & Holman, R. (2014). The effects of political orientation on religious commitment. Journal of Political Psychology, 35(2), 189-204.
  • Durkheim, E. (1915). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Free Press, 1995 edition.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
  • Hout, M., & Fischer, C. S. (2002). Religious Change in US Society. Review of Religious Research, 43(3), 218-234.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

Related Assignments