Political Personalities When Doing This Assignment Keep In M

Political Personalities When Doing This Assignment Keep In Mind

Choose a social or political leader (current or past) to examine through an Adlerian framework of superiority striving and style of life. Analyze the motivation behind this leader’s career choice, the perceived inferiority or weakness they experienced, and how they attained their high level of superiority striving. Discuss the leader’s style of life, their goals, and the steps they took to overcome their perceived inferiority. Evaluate whether the leader acted out of social interest or personal gain, and consider the long-term outcomes of their striving. Additionally, apply Adler’s theory of birth order to this personality.

Write a 2–3-page, double-spaced paper in 12-point Times New Roman font with one-inch margins, including a title page with a running head, an abstract, and a reference page. Use APA standards for citations and references. When choosing your leader (for example, Barack Obama), include your personal perspective, especially if you do not favor that individual, and evaluate their personality through Adlerian concepts.

Paper For Above instruction

The exploration of political personalities through Alfred Adler’s psychological principles offers a nuanced understanding of how childhood experiences and personality dynamics influence leadership behavior. This paper applies Adlerian theory—specifically superiority striving, style of life, and birth order—to analyze the leadership of Barack Obama, the 44th President of the United States, considering both his motivations and personal development.

Introduction

Adler’s theory emphasizes the importance of childhood experiences and perceived inferiority in shaping an individual’s personality and life choices. Superiority striving reflects a person’s efforts to overcome feelings of inferiority, which can be expressed healthily or unhealthily. Style of life encompasses the unique way an individual strives to achieve their goals, influenced by their personality, experiences, and inherent tendencies. Examining Barack Obama through this framework involves assessing his childhood background, motivations for pursuing politics, and his approach to leadership.

Motivation and Inferiority

Barack Obama’s motivation to pursue a career in politics and leadership can be understood through Adler’s concept of superiority striving. As a mixed-race individual growing up in a predominantly white society, Obama faced societal and personal challenges related to racial identity and social acceptance. His perceived inferiority—stemming from racial discrimination, identity struggles, and societal marginalization—possibly fueled his ambition to succeed and make a difference. His early experiences of exclusion and the desire to uplift marginalized groups may have inspired his dedication to social justice and public service.

Furthermore, his childhood circumstances, including an absent father and frequent relocations, may have contributed to feelings of instability and inferiority, motivating him to seek achievement and societal recognition. His pursuit of higher education, law, and eventually the presidency, exemplifies how superiority striving—when aligned with social interest—can foster positive societal outcomes.

Style of Life and Overcoming Inferiority

Obama’s style of life appears to be oriented toward social interest—a core Adlerian concept emphasizing cooperation, community, and societal benefit. His goals centered on national unity, healthcare reform, and global diplomacy, reflecting a purpose beyond personal gain. To overcome perceived inferiority, Obama emphasized education, dialogue, and community engagement, adopting a style of life that prioritized social contribution.

His political career involved strategic steps like obtaining elite education at Harvard Law School, engaging in community activism, and crafting policies aimed at social betterment. These steps exhibit a constructive approach to dealing with feelings of inferiority, channeling them into efforts that benefit society. While personal ambition undoubtedly played a role, his public statements and policies often reflected a social interest, aligning with Adler’s ideal of striving for community and societal progress.

Birth Order and Personality

Regarding birth order, Obama was the only child of his mother, and his experiences as an outsider may be amplified by his family background. Adler suggested that firstborns often develop a sense of responsibility and leadership skills, which could be characteristic of Obama’s leadership style. Alternatively, his mixed-race identity might have positioned him as an outsider, prompting a drive to prove himself and develop resilience. The combination of these factors might have influenced his assertiveness and emphasis on social justice, aligning with Adler’s observations on birth order’s impact on personality development.

Conclusion

Applying Adlerian theory to Barack Obama’s leadership reveals a complex interplay of childhood influences, motivations rooted in overcoming perceived inferiority, and a style of life focused on social interest. His pursuit of political success can be seen as an integrative effort to overcome racial and societal challenges, driven by an intrinsic desire to contribute positively to society. The long-term outcomes of his striving reflect both personal achievement and societal impact, embodying Adler’s optimistic view of human development and potential.

References

  • Adler, A. (1931). The practice and theory of individual psychology. Harper & Brothers.
  • Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of Personality (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Kaplan, H. B. (1991). Psychological styles in political leadership. Journal of Political Psychology, 12(4), 575–589.
  • McLeod, J. (2007). Adlerian therapy. In C. E. W. Murdock (Ed.), Theories of Psychotherapy & Counseling (2nd ed., pp. 57–77). Pearson.
  • Owen, C. L., & Brodsky, D. (2013). Leadership and Adlerian theory. Journal of Counseling & Development, 91(2), 134–147.
  • Reynolds, C. R. (2018). Theories of personality: Humans and human nature. Routledge.
  • Shostrum, R. (1998). The psychology of leadership: A qualitative analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 9(3), 177–198.
  • Sutherland, D., & Davidson, P. (2014). The dynamics of birth order. Journal of Individual Psychology, 70(2), 189–205.
  • Wachter, M., & Hains, S. C. (2017). Leadership psychology: From theory to practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Yalom, I. D. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. Basic Books.