Portfolio Assignments Preface Listed Below ✓ Solved

Portfolio Assignments Preface Listed below are

Portfolio projects consist of the following three unique phases: Profile. Research Question 1 Investigation of Alabi, Time as Alibi and Location as Alibi. Research Question 2. Cybercrime Law, Computer-Integrity Crime, Fraud, and Abuse.

Each student must submit two (2) successful completed documents: Profile Collaborative Group Assignment. Phase 1: Student Professional Profile Portfolio. Your profile should include your full name, profile status (Graduate or Post-graduate), academic areas of concentration, and current professional career path.

Research Question 1 focuses on the investigation of Alabi as a means to determine the timeline and implications of location in criminal cases. Alibi refers to the state of being elsewhere during the commission of a crime, providing a defense for the accused. It's essential to understand the technological aspects that underpin alibi assertions, such as forensic evidence from computer logs and the intricate details tracked by telecommunication companies and credit card corporations.

In exploring the criminal modus operandi and the evidence collection process, the research should address how investigators secure and analyze data from various technological sources. It should also consider the role of the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) and the Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP) in identifying and documenting internet usage relevant to criminal activity.

Research Question 2 delves into the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) of 1986, which addresses computer-related crimes. This segment of the portfolio should analyze how the CFAA interfaces with forensic investigations and explore the regulatory framework's evolution in response to changing technological landscapes.

Paper For Above Instructions

In the modern age of technology, criminal investigations have evolved significantly due to the advent of sophisticated computer systems and the internet. Within this context, the portfolio assignment seeks to explore the concept of alibi and cybercrime law, particularly focusing on the implications of location and time in criminal activities.

Understanding the Concept of Alibi

An alibi serves as a critical defense mechanism in criminal law, allowing individuals to assert that they were not present at the scene of a crime at the relevant time. The notion of alibi is derived from the Latin word meaning "elsewhere," indicating that the individual can provide credible evidence of their location during the commission of an alleged crime. This concept becomes complex when modern technology is involved, as digital footprints can either corroborate or contradict alibi claims.

For example, telecommunications companies maintain detailed records of call logs, providing timestamps and geographic data that can shed light on an individual's whereabouts. Similarly, modern transactions often leave a digital trail through credit card records and online activity. This highlights the necessity for forensic investigators to consider various technological sources and methods to validate or invalidate alibis. The investigative process must be systematic, beginning with securing access to relevant data from computer workstations and network systems to perform a thorough examination of any available logs or records.

Research Question 1: Alibi and the Role of Technology

Research Question 1 focuses on the relationship between alibi defenses and the use of technology in criminal investigations. The first part of this question examines how the criminal modus operandi (MO) can either reinforce or undermine an alibi. Criminals often operate under the assumption that they can escape detection by creating false alibis; however, the reality is that forensic evidence often counters these deceptions. Forensic investigators utilize evidence from various sources such as IP logs, DHCP servers, and BOOTP configurations to build a comprehensive understanding of the crime.

For instance, employing DHCP data can help determine whether a suspect had access to a particular network during the time a crime was committed. This can be pivotal in proving or disproving an alibi, as dynamic IP address assignments may reveal whether a suspect was online at the supposed time of the offense. Furthermore, analyzing timestamps from emails or social media postings can provide additional layers of evidence that either validate or challenge an individual's claim of innocence.

Research Question 2: Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

Turning to Research Question 2, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) provides a legal framework for addressing cybercrimes, including unauthorized computer access, distribution of malware, and various online frauds. The evolution of the CFAA has highlighted the necessity of stringent regulations as criminal methodologies have adapted to technological advancements. Forensic investigators must navigate these legal parameters to ensure that their findings can withstand scrutiny in court. The CFAA empowers forensic investigations by providing a mechanism for prosecuting cybercriminals and establishing the legitimacy of digital evidence.

Moreover, the CFAA's amendments have aimed to close loopholes that once allowed cybercriminals to exploit technicalities in the law. Investigating under this regulatory framework requires a knowledgeable approach by forensic investigators who must understand both the technical intricacies of cyber evidence and the legal standards governing its admissibility in court.

Building a Research Framework

Developing a measurable research framework is essential for both Research Question 1 and Research Question 2. This framework should integrate technology's role in verifying alibis with legal discourse concerning the ramifications of the CFAA on forensic investigations. As a practical step, investigators should create guidelines that outline methodologies for collecting, analyzing, and presenting evidence while forming a solid basis for legal proceedings. The framework must also consider the potential future amendments to the CFAA as technology continues to evolve.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the intersection of technology, forensic investigation, and legal standards remains critically relevant in today's digital-oriented society. Understanding the nuanced roles of alibi and regulatory frameworks like the CFAA enhances the capability of forensic investigators to accurately assess evidence, address cybercrimes, and contribute to bringing justice to light. The proposed research questions serve as a foundation for further exploration, enabling academics and professionals alike to delve deeper into the complexities of these vital issues.

References

• Anderson, R. (2020). Security Engineering: A Guide to Building Dependable Distributed Systems. Wiley.
• Casey, E. (2019). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers, and the Internet. Academic Press.
• Colbert, A. D., & D'Souza, A. (2021). Blockchain for Cybersecurity. Springer.
• Goodman, S. (2018). Cybercrime: The Emerging Threats. Springer.
• Harris, A. (2019). Cybercrime, Cybersecurity, and Cyber Intelligence. Elsevier.
• Lane, M. (2020). Information Technology Law: The Law and Regulation of Information Technology. Routledge.
• Reed, C. (2021). Computer Law: The Law and Regulation of Electronic Communication and Transactions. Oxford University Press.
• Rowe, N. C., & Newham, J. (2018). Cybersecurity: The New Frontier. Springer.
• Seymour, D. (2020). The Internet and the Law: Technology and Policy in the Digital Age. Cambridge University Press.
• Vacca, J. R. (2019). Computer and Information Security Handbook. Morgan Kaufmann.