Post 2: Courtney, The Purpose Of This Discussion Post Is To

Post 2 Courtneythe Purpose Of This Discussion Post Is To Explore The

The discussion focuses on the issues surrounding mental health promotion and disease prevention in the United States. It emphasizes that mental illness is the leading cause of disability nationally, with over 70% of individuals needing services not receiving them. The primary barriers identified include stigmas attached to mental disorders, lack of resources, and limited research. Stigma results in patients feeling rejected or degraded, and healthcare providers’ biases often lead to neglect or impaired care. Resource limitations, such as inadequate insurance coverage, long wait times, and insufficient availability of mental health services, further hinder access. Additionally, a lack of education about available resources, especially among younger populations, exacerbates the issue. These barriers contribute to a reduction in research focus, which hampers the development of better treatment options. The paper highlights the economic burden of mental illness, estimated at around $30 billion annually, and advocates for increased prioritization of mental health research and services. The writer also discusses their local community hospital’s mental health challenges, noting the need for better screening and follow-up procedures to prevent patients from slipping through the cracks.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Mental health issues constitute a significant public health challenge in the United States, with mental illness being the leading cause of disability (Wainberg et al., 2017). Despite advances in health technology and understanding, a substantial proportion of individuals afflicted with mental health conditions remain untreated. Addressing this gap necessitates a comprehensive examination of the barriers impeding mental health promotion and disease prevention efforts. Three predominant issues contribute to the inadequate mental health services in the U.S.: societal stigma, resource limitations, and insufficient research endeavors.

Stigma surrounding mental health remains a pervasive obstacle impacting care delivery and patient willingness to seek help. Individuals with mental health concerns often report feeling rejected, degraded, or misunderstood by healthcare professionals (Knaak et al., 2017). This stigma manifests in various ways, including biases that result in healthcare providers assuming that mental illness affects a patient's decision-making capacity unjustly. Such perceptions can lead to patients being denied autonomy or respect, and in some cases, to neglect of their specific needs. Moreover, mental health stigma fosters hopelessness among patients by perpetuating the misconception that mental illnesses are untreatable or lifelong burdens. Healthcare professionals are not immune to stigmatizing attitudes either; high rates of burnout among mental health workers can adversely influence the quality of patient interactions and treatment outcomes (Knaak et al., 2017). High stigma levels also affect funding allocations, as mental illnesses are often de-prioritized, resulting in fewer resources, reduced service availability, and diminished quality of care.

The resource-related barriers are multifaceted, encompassing inadequate insurance coverage, long wait times, geographic inaccessibility, and insufficient public education. Many Americans with mental health issues face financial barriers due to high costs associated with insurance premiums and the expense of specialized mental health services (Wood et al., 2018). Over 40% of individuals with mental health conditions cite limited insurance coverage as a primary reason for lack of access. The high costs often deter individuals from seeking necessary care, thus exacerbating their conditions. Additionally, long wait times for mental health services and a shortage of providers, especially in rural or underserved areas, further impede access. Lack of adequate information and education about available mental health services, especially among younger populations, intensifies this problem. Young individuals may fear judgment or lack awareness, leading to delays or avoidance in seeking treatment.

The ongoing neglect of mental health research compounds these issues. Limited research funding and societal perceptions that mental illnesses are less severe than physical illnesses reduce incentives to develop better treatments and preventive strategies. For example, many patients are prescribed antidepressants without personalized assessments, often feeling robotic or dissatisfied with their care (Lake, 2017). This generalization undermines nuanced understanding and effective interventions tailored to individual needs. The economic impact of untreated mental health conditions is profound, with costs reaching approximately $30 billion annually in productivity losses alone (Lake, 2017). Recognizing these challenges, policymakers and healthcare leaders must elevate mental health research as a priority. Innovations in understanding brain chemistry, developing alternative therapies, and refining screening and follow-up protocols are essential to improve outcomes.

In the context of community healthcare, practitioners often encounter mental health issues indirectly, such as in patients presenting with physical ailments. For instance, the writer's community hospital mostly sees patients with depression or suicidal ideation manifesting through comorbid health concerns. Such cases demonstrate the necessity for proactive screening and sustained follow-up care to prevent vulnerable populations from deteriorating or being discharged prematurely. Implementing comprehensive screening protocols tailored to demographic factors can help identify at-risk individuals earlier, ensuring timely intervention (WHO, 2020). For example, integrating mental health assessments into routine health checks in primary care or community settings can bridge the gap between need and service provision. Overall, tackling stigma, expanding resources, and bolstering research are critical steps in addressing the mental health crisis in America.

References

  • Knaak, S., Mantler, E., & Szeto, A. (2017). Mental illness-related stigma in healthcare. Healthcare Management Forum, 30(2), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470417698120
  • Lake, J. (2017). Urgent Need for Improved Mental Health Care and a More Collaborative Model of Care. The Permanente Journal, 21, 17-024. https://doi.org/10.7812/tpp/17-024
  • Wainberg, M. L., Scorza, P., Shultz, J. M., Helpman, L., Mootz, J. J., Johnson, K. A., & Arbuckle, M. R. (2017). Challenges and Opportunities in Global Mental Health: A Research-to-Practice Perspective. Current Psychiatry Reports, 19(5), 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0789-2
  • Wood, P., Burwell, J., & Rawlett, K. (2018). New Study Reveals Lack of Access as Root Cause for Mental Health Crisis in America. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 45(2), 183-191.
  • World Health Organization. (2020). Mental health: strengthening our response. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response
  • Hernandez, L. M., & Blazer, D. G. (2016). Sex/Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Health. In Genes, Behavior, and the Social Environment: Moving Beyond the Nurture/Nature Debate (pp. 65-89). National Academies Press.
  • Iragorri, N., & Spackman, E. (2018). Assessing the value of screening tools: reviewing the challenges and opportunities of cost-effectiveness analysis. Public Health Reviews, 39, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-018-0098-4
  • Hernandez, L. M., & Blazer, D. G. (2016). Sex/Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Health. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021). Mental Health Data and Resources. https://www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth/data_resources.html
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2021). Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/

Related Assignments