Power Of Observation: Please Respond To The Following Select
Power Of Observationplease Respond To The Followingselect One 1 O
Power of Observation: Please respond to the following. Select one (1) of the following concepts to examine: in-group / out-group, bystander effect, conformity, nonconformity, foot-in-the-door strategy, or door-in-the-face strategy. Next, describe one (1) situation in which you observed the concept chosen. Situations can be anything from observing people in a grocery store to interacting with your children or a colleague, among many others. Then, identify the concept you observed and discuss how it relates to the situation.
Paper For Above instruction
The power of observation is a fundamental skill in understanding human behavior, especially within social psychology. It involves attentive awareness and interpretation of actions and motivations in real-life contexts. For this essay, I have chosen to examine the concept of conformity, which is the tendency of individuals to align their attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors with those of a group, often to fit in or be accepted.
A pertinent situation illustrating conformity occurred during a group project at my workplace. Several colleagues and I were working together on a new marketing strategy. During the meetings, I noticed that most team members seemed hesitant to challenge the suggestions made by a senior manager, who was very vocal and authoritative. Despite some reservations, most team members nodded in agreement and voiced support for the manager’s ideas. However, I observed one colleague who remained silent throughout the discussion, seemingly hesitant to express disagreement.
This situation clearly exemplifies conformity. The colleagues appeared to conform to the perceived expectations of the group and the authority of the senior manager. This aligns with the classic definition of conformity, where individuals alter their behavior to match group norms or expectations, often due to a desire for social acceptance or fear of rejection (Asch, 1951). The silent colleague’s behavior suggests a conformity pressure that discourages open dissent, especially in hierarchical settings.
The concept of conformity is rooted in social influence theory, which posits that individuals’ behaviors are shaped by the presence and actions of others (Kelman, 1958). In the observed situation, group members may have conformed because they believed the manager’s suggestions were correct or because they wished to avoid conflict. This aligns with normative social influence, where individuals conform to group expectations to be liked or accepted (Deutsch & Gerard, 1955). The observed silent colleague might have also feared negative evaluation or social rejection, which is a common motive behind conformity (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
Furthermore, the phenomenon of conformity in this context can be understood through the lens of informational influence, where individuals look to others’ behavior as a source of correct information, especially in uncertain or ambiguous situations (Sherif, 1936). Although the group was not ambiguous in their suggestion, the hierarchical power dynamic likely influenced the silent colleague to stay silent, perhaps believing that the group consensus reflected the right choice and avoiding conflict.
Research indicates that conformity is especially prominent in group settings where power differentials are evident (Milgram, 1963). In organizational contexts, individuals often conform to the ideas of superiors to maintain harmony and security within the workplace. The importance of social acceptance and fear of negative repercussions can inhibit honest dissent, an issue that hinders creative and critical thinking.
Understanding the influence of conformity is vital for leaders and organizations. It highlights the importance of creating an environment where dissent is encouraged and diverse opinions are valued. Such environments can lead to better decision making, innovation, and overall organizational health. Managers should foster open communication and explicitly seek out alternative perspectives to counteract conformity pressures within teams.
In conclusion, the situation at my workplace vividly illustrates the concept of conformity, driven by social and hierarchical influences. Recognizing such patterns can help organizations and individuals foster environments that promote authentic expression and critical thinking. Ultimately, understanding conformity can lead to healthier group dynamics, better decision-making processes, and more inclusive workplaces.
References
Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. O Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46(4), 245–249.
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636.
Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51–60.
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.
Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Harper.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2016). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. Guilford Publications.
Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2018). Social psychology. Pearson Education.
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. McGraw-Hill Book Company.