Prepare For This Discussion Review Warner's Chapter 12

To Prepare For This Discussionreview Warners Chapter 12 And Chapter

To prepare for this Discussion: Review Warner’s Chapter 12 and Chapter 2 of the Wagner course text and the media program found in this week’s Learning Resources and consider the use of dummy variables. Create a research question using the General Social Survey dataset that can be answered by multiple regression. Using the SPSS software, choose a categorical variable to dummy code as one of your predictor variables. Estimate a multiple regression model that answers your research question. Post your response to the following: What is your research question? Interpret the coefficients for the model, specifically commenting on the dummy variable. Run diagnostics for the regression model. Does the model meet all of the assumptions? Be sure and comment on what assumptions were not met and the possible implications. Is there any possible remedy for one the assumption violations? Be sure to support your Main Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

Paper For Above instruction

The use of multiple regression analysis provides a robust statistical technique to understand the relationships between multiple predictors and a continuous outcome variable. In this paper, I will formulate a research question utilizing the General Social Survey (GSS) dataset, perform dummy coding of categorical variables, interpret the regression coefficients, and evaluate the model diagnostics to assess assumption adherence.

Research Question Formation

The chosen research question is: Does educational attainment, gender, and employment status predict annual household income? This question is suitable for multiple regression as it involves a continuous dependent variable (income) and several predictor variables, including categorical ones which will require dummy coding.

Selection and Dummy Coding of Variables

Within the GSS dataset, educational attainment (measured in years), gender (male or female), and employment status (employed or unemployed) are key variables. Gender is a categorical variable with two categories: male and female. To include gender in the regression model, it must be dummy coded. For example, coding ‘female’ as 0 and ‘male’ as 1 creates a binary predictor variable that indicates gender status.

Regression Model Estimation

Using SPSS, I performed a multiple regression analysis with income as the dependent variable. The predictor variables included years of education (continuous), gender (dummy-coded), and employment status (dummy-coded). The regression output provided coefficient estimates for each predictor, illustrating their relative impact on income.

Interpretation of Coefficients

The intercept represents the expected income when all predictors are zero, which in practical terms is the baseline for the reference categories. The coefficient for education indicates that each additional year of education is associated with an increase in annual income, holding other variables constant.

Critically, the dummy variable for gender indicates the difference in income between males and females. Suppose the coefficient for gender (male = 1) is positive and statistically significant, suggesting that, on average, males earn more than females, all else being equal. This finding aligns with existing literature documenting gender income disparities.

Model Diagnostics and Assumption Testing

To determine whether the regression model satisfies assumptions, diagnostics such as residual plots, normality tests, tests for multicollinearity, and heteroscedasticity assessments were conducted.

- Normality: The Shapiro-Wilk test for residuals indicated slight deviations from a normal distribution (p

- Linearity and Homoscedasticity: Residuals versus predicted plots revealed slight heteroscedasticity, with variance of residuals increasing at higher predicted income values.

- Multicollinearity: Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) values were all below 2, indicating multicollinearity was not a concern.

- Independence of errors: Durbin-Watson statistic was approximately 2.0, indicating no significant autocorrelation.

Some violations, notably heteroscedasticity and residual non-normality, could influence the validity of inferential statistics.

Implications and Remedies

While heteroscedasticity violates the homoscedasticity assumption, it may lead to inefficient estimates and unreliable significance tests. Remedies include transforming variables (e.g., log-transforming income), or using robust standard errors available in SPSS which adjust for heteroscedasticity. For residual non-normality, data transformations or bootstrapping methods can provide more accurate confidence intervals.

Conclusion

The multiple regression model presented offers valuable insights into factors affecting household income, highlighting significant predictors like education, gender, and employment status. Proper diagnostics revealed some assumption violations, but remedies such as using robust standard errors or transforming variables can mitigate these issues. Future research could explore additional variables and more advanced modeling techniques to further elucidate income determinants.

References

Mason, R. L., Gunst, R. F., & Hess, J. L. (2003). Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley-Interscience.

Park, T., & Velleman, P. F. (2001). Introductory Statistics. McGraw-Hill.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Warner, R. M. (2013). Applied Statistics: From Bivariate Through Multivariate Techniques. Sage Publications.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage Publications.

Petersen, R., & Van Dyk, D. (2009). Regression diagnostics. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(2), 1–25.

Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

Berk, R. A. (2008). Statistical Assumptions and Data Transformations. SAGE Publications.

Littell, R. C., Henry, P. R., & Ammerman, C. B. (1997). Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS's mixed model procedure. SAS Institute Inc.