Preparing For This Discussion Forum: Make A List

Preparein Preparation For This Discussion Forum Make A List Of What

In preparation for this discussion forum, make a list of what you learned most throughout the process of researching your final essay topic, as well as difficulties you may have encountered along the way. Reflect: Think about what you have learned in the development of your research findings on the global societal issue you chose in the Week 1 discussion forum, your proposed solution and its ethical outcomes, and share with your classmates why this specific issue requires further research.

Write: For this discussion, you will address the following prompts: Identify the global societal issue you have chosen to research for your Final Paper, an argumentative essay, and explain why further research on this topic is important. Provide a clear and concise thesis statement that includes a solution to the global societal issue. Explain how this global societal issue impacts a specific population. Locate a peer-reviewed scholarly source and provide statistical data that you found surprising on the topic. Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length, which should include a thorough response to each prompt. You are required to provide in-text citations of applicable required reading materials and/or any other outside sources you use to support your claims.

Provide full reference entries of all sources cited at the end of your response. Please use correct APA format when writing in-text citations and references. Respond to Peers: Review your classmates’ posts, and respond to at least two of your peers by Day 7. Comment on your peer’s explanation of how their chosen global societal issue impacts a specific population. Each participation post should be a minimum of 75 words.

Paper For Above instruction

The global societal issue I have chosen to examine for my final paper is food insecurity, a problem that affects millions worldwide and is associated with severe health and social consequences. Food insecurity refers to the lack of consistent access to enough nutritious food for an active, healthy life (FAO, 2020). Understanding this issue is crucial because it not only impacts individuals' physical wellbeing but also exacerbates social inequalities and hampers economic development. Further research is essential to identify effective strategies for alleviating food insecurity and to evaluate the ethical implications of different intervention models, such as food aid programs or community-based initiatives.

The thesis statement I propose is: Implementing community-driven food sovereignty programs offers a sustainable solution to reducing global food insecurity while respecting cultural differences and promoting ethical responsibility. These programs empower local populations to manage their own food systems, fostering resilience and self-reliance.

This issue primarily impacts vulnerable populations such as low-income families, indigenous communities, and children living in impoverished urban areas. For example, children experiencing food insecurity are more likely to suffer from developmental delays, poor academic performance, and increased health risks, which underscores the importance of targeted interventions (Gundersen & Ziliak, 2015). Such impacts highlight the urgent need for comprehensive research to develop culturally sensitive and ethically sound solutions.

A surprising statistic I discovered is that, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, 2020), approximately 690 million people worldwide suffer from hunger, and this number is projected to rise due to climate change and economic instability. This unsettling data emphasizes the critical importance of addressing food insecurity through sustainable and ethically grounded strategies.

References

• Food and Agriculture Organization. (2020). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9692en
• Gundersen, C., & Ziliak, J. P. (2015). Food insecurity and health outcomes. Health Affairs, 34(11), 1830–1839. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0645