Present An Example Of A Recent Decision You Have Made

Present An Example Of A Recent Decision You Have Made What Steps Did

Present an example of a recent decision you have made. What steps did you apply in the decision-making process, and where there steps not applied that might have been helpful? Should companies be held responsible for the illegal or unethical actions of employees using company-owned computers? Give two reasons to support your view.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Decision-making is an integral part of personal and organizational life, requiring deliberate steps to evaluate options and consequences. This paper presents a recent decision I made about pursuing a professional certification, analyzes the decision-making process, discusses potential omitted steps that could have enhanced the decision, and explores the extent of corporate responsibility for employee misconduct using company-owned resources. Through this analysis, the importance of structured decision processes and ethical considerations in organizational settings will be elucidated.

Example of a Recent Decision

Recently, I decided to enroll in a professional certification program relevant to my career development. The decision was prompted by my desire to enhance my skills and improve job performance. I considered various options, including different certification programs, costs, time commitments, and the potential benefits to my career trajectory.

Steps Applied in the Decision-Making Process

The primary steps I utilized included problem identification, information gathering, evaluation of alternatives, and decision implementation. Initially, I identified the need for further professional development as a way to remain competitive in my field. Subsequently, I gathered information about different certifications, their relevance, costs, and schedule. I then weighed the pros and cons of each option, considering factors such as return on investment and alignment with my career goals. Finally, I chose the certification that offered the best balance of value and feasibility.

Steps Not Applied That Could Have Been Helpful

However, some steps were not explicitly applied, such as consulting with mentors or colleagues for their insights and conducting a cost-benefit analysis. Including these steps might have provided additional perspectives and a more comprehensive understanding of the decision's long-term impacts. Additionally, establishing clear criteria for decision-making beforehand could have enhanced objectivity and confidence in the choice.

Responsibility of Companies for Employees' Illegal or Unethical Actions

The question of whether companies should be held responsible for employees' illegal or unethical activities performed using company-owned computers is complex and ethically significant.

Supporting Reasons

Firstly, organizations are liable for maintaining a secure and ethical work environment. When employees misuse company resources, it reflects a failure of organizational oversight or inadequate policies. For instance, if a company does not implement proper monitoring or enforce acceptable use policies, it may be complicit in the misconduct (Schneider & Ingram, 2019). A responsible organization should establish clear guidelines and actively oversee employee activities to prevent unethical or illegal actions.

Secondly, holding companies accountable promotes corporate social responsibility and ethical behavior. When organizations accept responsibility for misuse of company property, they are incentivized to develop stronger policies, training programs, and monitoring systems that foster ethical conduct. This accountability aligns with broader societal expectations that companies act responsibly in safeguarding stakeholders’ interests and complying with legal standards (Crane et al., 2014).

However, it is equally important to differentiate between organizational oversight and individual responsibility. Employees are accountable for their personal actions, but organizations must ensure that they create an environment that discourages misconduct and supports ethical decision-making (Mitchell & Dacin, 2020).

Conclusion

In conclusion, decision-making is a process that benefits from structured steps such as information gathering, evaluation, and consultation. Omitting steps like expert advice and detailed analysis can sometimes lead to less informed choices. Regarding corporate responsibility, companies should be held accountable for illegal or unethical employee actions using company resources, as this fosters accountability and ethical standards. Ethical corporate governance and proactive policies are essential for preventing misconduct and maintaining stakeholder trust.

References

  • Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context. Routledge.
  • Mitchell, R. K., & Dacin, P. A. (2020). The social undertone of corporate misconduct: An organizational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(1), 1-13.
  • Schneider, M., & Ingram, H. (2019). Public policies and organizational misconduct: A governance perspective. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 472-482.
  • Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2013). Judgment in managerial decision making. Wiley.
  • Simon, H. A. (2014). The sciences of the artificial. MIT press.
  • Varey, R., & Peirson, R. (2019). Ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 983-993.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Readings in attitude theory and measurement, 1, 63-85.
  • Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2017). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hoffman, W. M., & Ferrell, O. C. (2014). Business ethics: Ethical decision making & cases. Cengage Learning.
  • Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (2014). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 567-582.

Related Assignments