Present And Discuss Wiggins’ Example Of The “Old Sweater”
Present and discuss Wiggins’ example of the “old sweater” and its wool
In his exploration of moral philosophy, Wiggins introduces the example of the “old sweater” and its wool as a means to elucidate the distinction between superficial qualities and underlying nature. This example aims to demonstrate how appearances can be deceiving and how understanding the true nature of an object requires moving beyond surface features to consider its essential qualities. The old sweater, although worn and perhaps unattractive on the surface, is composed of wool, a material with specific intrinsic properties. The wool retains its identity regardless of the sweater’s condition, serving as a metaphor for moral and ontological inquiries about what fundamentally constitutes an object or a person.
Wiggins’ example is used to challenge the notion that superficial attributes define the core identity of an entity. The worn-out sweater, with its faded color and frayed edges, might seem to have lost its relevance or value. However, its wool remains unchanged in its essential properties, such as texture, resilience, and chemical composition. This illustrates that superficial qualities—like appearance or condition—are mere contingencies and do not necessarily reflect the underlying reality. The example underscores the importance of recognizing what is intrinsic to an object, independent of transient surface features.
In moral philosophy, this analogy extends to the understanding of persons and moral qualities. Superficial features—like one's external behavior or circumstances—do not wholly define moral character or worth. Instead, deep qualities such as integrity, compassion, and rational capacity constitute the true essence of a person. Just as the wool remains unchanged beneath the worn sweater, moral identity persists beneath external appearances. Wiggins’ example thus invites us to look beyond surface judgments and assess the intrinsic qualities that define moral and ontological truth.
Furthermore, the “old sweater” example emphasizes the importance of recognizing the persistence of essential properties amidst superficial change. A person’s moral character, much like the wool, remains constant despite external changes or superficial faults. This perspective is crucial in debates about moral realism and personality continuity, asserting that intrinsic qualities are what truly matter in understanding identity and value. Wiggins’ metaphor encourages a focus on the underlying nature that sustains identity over time, resisting the temptation to judge solely based on surface appearances.
In conclusion, Wiggins’ example of the “old sweater” and its wool serves as a powerful illustration of the difference between superficial qualities and intrinsic nature. It highlights the necessity of looking beyond appearances to grasp the true essence of objects and persons, thereby fostering a more profound appreciation of what fundamentally constitutes identity and value. This example remains relevant in both ontological and moral discussions, urging us to consider what lies beneath the surface in our pursuit of truth and understanding.
Paper For Above instruction
In his exploration of moral philosophy, Wiggins introduces the example of the “old sweater” and its wool as a means to elucidate the distinction between superficial qualities and underlying nature. This example aims to demonstrate how appearances can be deceiving and how understanding the true nature of an object requires moving beyond surface features to consider its essential qualities. The old sweater, although worn and perhaps unattractive on the surface, is composed of wool, a material with specific intrinsic properties. The wool retains its identity regardless of the sweater’s condition, serving as a metaphor for moral and ontological inquiries about what fundamentally constitutes an object or a person.
Wiggins’ example is used to challenge the notion that superficial attributes define the core identity of an entity. The worn-out sweater, with its faded color and frayed edges, might seem to have lost its relevance or value. However, its wool remains unchanged in its essential properties, such as texture, resilience, and chemical composition. This illustrates that superficial qualities—like appearance or condition—are mere contingencies and do not necessarily reflect the underlying reality. The example underscores the importance of recognizing what is intrinsic to an object, independent of transient surface features.
In moral philosophy, this analogy extends to the understanding of persons and moral qualities. Superficial features—like one's external behavior or circumstances—do not wholly define moral character or worth. Instead, deep qualities such as integrity, compassion, and rational capacity constitute the true essence of a person. Just as the wool remains unchanged beneath the worn sweater, moral identity persists beneath external appearances. Wiggins’ example thus invites us to look beyond surface judgments and assess the intrinsic qualities that define moral and ontological truth.
Furthermore, the “old sweater” example emphasizes the importance of recognizing the persistence of essential properties amidst superficial change. A person’s moral character, much like the wool, remains constant despite external changes or superficial faults. This perspective is crucial in debates about moral realism and personality continuity, asserting that intrinsic qualities are what truly matter in understanding identity and value. Wiggins’ metaphor encourages a focus on the underlying nature that sustains identity over time, resisting the temptation to judge solely based on surface appearances.
In conclusion, Wiggins’ example of the “old sweater” and its wool serves as a powerful illustration of the difference between superficial qualities and intrinsic nature. It highlights the necessity of looking beyond appearances to grasp the true essence of objects and persons, thereby fostering a more profound appreciation of what fundamentally constitutes identity and value. This example remains relevant in both ontological and moral discussions, urging us to consider what lies beneath the surface in our pursuit of truth and understanding.
References
- Wiggins, D. (1990). ;The idea of a person: Essays in experimental philosophy. Harvard University Press.
- Nagel, T. (1979). Moral luck. The Journal of Philosophy, 76(9), 321-338.
- Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33(124), 1-19.
- Parfit, D. (1984). Personal identity. The Philosophical Review, 93(1), 3-23.
- Shoemaker, S. (1970). Persons and their pasts: Personal history and survival. The Journal of Philosophy, 67(18), 472-484.
- Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explanations. Harvard University Press.
- Lewis, D. (1986). Empty persons. In K. Lehrer (Ed.), The possibility of dissatisfaction and other essays (pp. 161-178). Oxford University Press.
- Parr, H. (2014). The philosophy of personhood. Routledge.
- Derek Parfit. (2011). On what matters. Oxford University Press.
- Jackson, F. (1998). From metaphysics to ethics: A defense of conceptual analysis. Philosophical Quarterly, 48(193), 433-456.