Presentation: The Training Plan Due Week 8 And Worth 180 Poi

Presentation the Training Plan Due Week 8 and Worth 180 Poi

Assignm...

Provide a brief overview of the organization. Specify the task(s) for which the training is being developed as well as the most significant elements or steps for performing each one.

Describe at least five (5) characteristics of the intended audience for the training. Explain the two (2) strategies to incorporate key aspect of the selected theoretical model into the design and delivery of the planned training.

Describe the instructional settings for the training being. Illustrate the instructional activities for deliver training on the task(s). Indicate all needed technology components that you plan to integrate into the training.

Propose a timeline for development and implementation of the training. Propose three strategies for evaluating the effectiveness of the training during and after development. Develop a conclusion for the presentation that includes lessons learned.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: References must follow APA format. Include a cover slide containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.

Paper For Above instruction

The effective development and presentation of a training plan are critical components of educational success in adult learning environments. This paper presents a comprehensive training plan structured around the requirements outlined in the assignment prompts, integrating theoretical foundations, audience analysis, instructional design, technology integration, and evaluation strategies.

Organization Overview and Tasks: The organization selected for this training plan is a mid-sized manufacturing firm specializing in automotive parts. The primary task for which the training is developed is the proper maintenance and operation of a new automated assembly line. The critical steps include safety procedures, equipment calibration, troubleshooting common issues, and quality assurance protocols. These steps are essential for ensuring efficiency, safety, and product quality, and the training aims to equip employees with the necessary skills and knowledge to perform these tasks proficiently.

Target Audience Characteristics: The intended audience comprises twenty-five employees, primarily machine operators with a varied range of experience levels. Five key characteristics of this audience include:

  • Diverse educational backgrounds, ranging from high school diplomas to technical certificates.
  • Varied familiarity with automation technology, from novices to experienced users.
  • Different learning preferences, including visual, auditory, and kinesthetic styles.
  • Varying levels of motivation and engagement, influenced by job security and career advancement prospects.
  • Language proficiency, with some employees for whom English is a second language, affecting comprehension and communication.

Theoretical Model Strategies: To incorporate adult learning theories, two strategies are implemented:

  1. Applying Knowles' principles of andragogy by involving learners in the planning process, thereby increasing relevance and motivation.
  2. Utilizing Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle by designing interactive activities that include concrete experiences, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation. This approach enhances engagement and retention.

Instructional Settings and Activities: The training will be delivered in a blended format, combining classroom-based theoretical instruction with hands-on practice in a simulated environment that mimics actual work conditions. Instructional activities include:

  • Interactive presentations supported by visuals and videos to explain the automation process and safety protocols.
  • Group discussions to facilitate knowledge sharing and problem-solving exercises.
  • Hands-on demonstrations and practice sessions for equipment calibration and troubleshooting.
  • Role-playing scenarios to reinforce safety procedures and decision-making skills.

Technology Components: The training will incorporate technological tools such as projectors, tablets for interactive quizzes, simulation software for practice exercises, and learning management systems (LMS) for resource access and assessments.

Development and Implementation Timeline: The development phase is scheduled for six weeks, including content creation, testing, and refinement. Implementation will occur over two weeks, beginning with a pilot session followed by full deployment. Key milestones include curriculum design, resource procurement, staff training, and post-implementation review.

Evaluation Strategies: To measure training effectiveness, three strategies are proposed:

  1. Pre- and post-training assessments to evaluate knowledge acquisition.
  2. Observation and performance assessments during hands-on activities to monitor skill development.
  3. Feedback surveys from participants and supervisors to assess perceived relevance, engagement, and areas for improvement.

Conclusion and Lessons Learned: The development of this training plan highlights the importance of aligning instructional design with adult learning principles, understanding audience characteristics, and leveraging technology for engagement. Lessons learned include the necessity of thorough planning, stakeholder involvement, and continuous evaluation to adapt and improve training effectiveness.

References

  • Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Routledge.
  • Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT Press.
  • Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. Jossey-Bass.
  • Andragogy in Practice. (2017). Development and application in adult education. Journal of Adult Education, 45(3), 34-45.
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5-9.
  • Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 541–568.
  • Branson, R. K., Rayner, G. T., & Meade, A. W. (2014). Instructional design: Principles and applications. Springer.
  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instructional design. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (2016). Designing for learning: Strategies, structures, and tools. Routledge.
  • Reigeluth, C. M., & An, Y. J. (2017). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Routledge.