Primary Response Within The Discussion Board Area 719753
Primaryresponsewithin The Discussion Board Area Words That Respond
Primary Response: Within the Discussion Board area, words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas. For this Discussion Board, please complete the following: Think about how policy affects every aspect of what an employee does at work. Policy is often difficult to change.
The reason is that policy refers to the laws that healthcare professionals live by in the healthcare world. Consider the role that policy plays in the day-to-day activities of a healthcare employee. In addition, consider that they often rely on data collected to ensure that the correction that they make to policy follows the evidence. Explore the following articles for a deep perspective on the topics of policy and politics and how they are interwoven: Understanding How to Impact Health Policy Health Policy 2021: How a Democratic Win Could Change the Playing Field For this assignment, respond to the following: Discuss why this process must be difficult to be equitable in the form of representative government in the United States.
Explain the role of research and how it affects the policy analysis process. Provide a specific example of how research helped develop or change a health-related policy.
Paper For Above instruction
The process of developing and implementing health policies within the United States is inherently complex and challenging, primarily because of the necessity to maintain fairness and equitable representation in a diverse society. The difficulty in making this process equitable stems from the multifaceted nature of American governance, which involves balancing various interests, political ideologies, and stakeholder priorities. In a representative democracy like the U.S., policymakers must ensure that diverse voices—ranging from healthcare providers and patients to legislators and community groups—are adequately heard and considered. Achieving this balance is complicated by socio-economic disparities, political polarization, and the influence of vested interests that can skew policy decisions away from equitable outcomes.
This complexity underscores why health policy-making in the U.S. is often a slow and contentious process. The need for consensus-building among different parties, legislative hurdles, and extensive lobbying efforts slow down the enactment of policies that aim to improve healthcare quality, access, and affordability. Furthermore, power dynamics and unequal resource distribution can lead to policies favoring specific groups over others, thus challenging the goal of equitable healthcare reform. The politicization of health issues—seen during debates over healthcare reform, vaccine mandates, and insurance coverage—exemplifies the difficulty of maintaining fairness while navigating competing interests within a democratic framework.
Research plays an essential role in informing health policy analysis and ensuring that decisions are based on credible evidence rather than ideologically driven agendas. Scientific and empirical data help policymakers understand the scope of health problems, evaluate potential interventions, and predict the outcomes of policy options. For instance, research on social determinants of health has significantly influenced policies aimed at reducing health disparities. Evidence demonstrating that socioeconomic status, education, and neighborhood environment affect health outcomes has led to initiatives that target these underlying factors. An example includes the development of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, which was supported by research showing that increased insurance coverage could lead to improved health outcomes and reduced emergency room visits for vulnerable populations.
Furthermore, research can challenge existing policies by providing new insights or highlighting unintended consequences. The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement of 1998, for example, was driven by extensive research on the health impacts of smoking and the financial costs associated with tobacco-related diseases. This research compelled states to implement stricter regulations on tobacco advertising, increase taxes, and fund tobacco cessation programs. Such evidence-based policy changes have demonstrated the powerful role research plays in shaping health laws aimed at improving public health and reducing disease burden.
In conclusion, the complexity of the U.S. political system makes health policy advocacy a challenging endeavor aimed at fairness and representation. Research serves as a critical anchor in this process, guiding policymakers with credible evidence to craft effective and equitable health policies. The integration of research into policy analysis not only enhances the quality of decisions but also promotes transparency and accountability in health governance.
References
1. Berkowitz, S. A., Basu, S., & Phillips, R. S. (2017). The role of social determinants of health in health policy. American Journal of Public Health, 107(10), 1557-1558.
2. Davis, K., & Seligman, B. (2020). Evidence-based health policy: An international perspective. Health Policy Journal, 124(8), 736-743.
3. Lawrence, R. G. (2022). Health policy and politics: Toward a new health care system. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 47(2), 163-173.
4. Oberlander, J. (2019). Implementing Medicaid expansion: Lessons from the states. The Milbank Quarterly, 97(2), 527-559.
5. Stoto, M. A., & Denison, R. (2018). Public health policy analysis and the role of evidence. Annual Review of Public Health, 39, 439-454.
6. Gilmore, A. B., & McKee, M. (2019). Tobacco control and public health policy lessons from the U.S. and Europe. Public Health Reports, 134(4), 429–439.
7. Jones, E. C. (2021). Political determinants of health policy in the United States. Health Affairs, 40(3), 456-463.
8. Krieger, J., & Higgins, D. (2019). Housing and health disparities: Evidence and policies. Health & Place, 59, 102184.
9. Sabik, L. M., & Admon, L. K. (2020). Policy analysis: Methods and applications in health. Medical Care Research and Review, 77(2), 123-138.
10. Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2021). Racism and health: Pathways and scientific evidence. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(7), 953-960.