Primary Task Response: Write 600-800 Words That Respond To T

Primary Task Responsewrite 600 800 Words That Respond To The Followin

Primary Task Response: Write words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. Use the Internet or the university library to identify a Website or article that discusses a framework for developing and implementing ethical policies and practices. Evaluate the framework based on your knowledge from the course text and assigned chapter readings to date. Compare and contrast your perspective of appropriate ethical practices with those stated in the example framework you selected. Respond to the prompts using higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) from Bloom's taxonomy. Be sure to demonstrate your mastery of the course content through analysis, synthesis, and the application of ideas.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The formulation and implementation of ethical policies are crucial in guiding organizational behavior and decision-making. As organizations navigate complex moral landscapes, establishing a robust ethical framework ensures integrity, accountability, and trustworthiness. This paper evaluates a selected ethical framework, comparing it with personal perspectives rooted in course learnings, exemplifying higher-order thinking through analysis, synthesis, and application.

Selected Ethical Framework

The framework chosen for evaluation is the "Ethical Decision-Making Model" outlined by the Ethics & Compliance Initiative (ECI). This model emphasizes six interrelated steps: recognizing ethical issues, gathering information, evaluating alternatives, making a decision, implementing the decision, and reflecting on the outcome. It promotes an organizational culture that encourages ethical awareness and accountability by integrating core values into every phase of decision-making.

Evaluation of the Framework

Grounded in ethical principles such as integrity, fairness, and respect, the ECI model aligns with foundational moral theories including deontology and virtue ethics. It encourages organizations to cultivate moral awareness and supports a systematic process for addressing ethical dilemmas. The framework’s cyclical nature emphasizes continuous reflection and learning, fostering an adaptive ethical climate within organizations—a relational approach resonant with the course's emphasis on organizational morality.

From a utilitarian perspective, this model seeks outcomes that promote overall well-being, considering stakeholder interests throughout the decision-making process, which aligns with consequentialist ethics. Moreover, its structured approach provides clarity and consistency, reducing ambiguity in ethical dilemmas, which enhances organizational trust and legitimacy.

However, potential limitations include the assumption that all employees possess equal ethical understanding or that decision-makers will always act honestly within the model. It may also overlook cultural differences influencing perceptions of ethics, a critical consideration in globalized organizations. The model’s emphasis on rational evaluation could neglect the emotional or intuitive aspects of ethical decision-making, which are vital in real-world contexts.

Comparison with Personal Ethical Perspectives

My personal perspective emphasizes the importance of a virtue-based approach, prioritizing integrity, compassion, and moral courage. I believe that ethical practices should not only follow systematic procedures but also foster moral character and empathetic understanding among organizational members. Unlike the structured decision-making steps in the ECI model, I advocate for a cultural embedding of virtues that guide behavior intuitively and morally.

While I agree with the ECI framework’s focus on systematic analysis, I perceive it as potentially impersonal if used rigidly. For instance, recognizing ethical issues should also involve emotional intelligence and moral intuition. An effective ethical environment promotes open dialogue, vulnerability, and moral courage, enabling individuals to voice concerns proactively rather than strictly adhering to procedural steps.

Moreover, cultural sensitivity is paramount in my perspective. Ethical frameworks must accommodate diverse value systems, particularly in multinational organizations. I consider the inclusion of ethical pluralism and cultural competence essential to developing policies that are both respectful and effective across different societal contexts.

Compared to the ECI model, which emphasizes consistency, I believe ethical practices should also be adaptable and context-specific, allowing moral judgment to evolve with changing circumstances and cultural nuances. Both approaches acknowledge the importance of ethical reflection, but my perspective emphasizes the cultivation of moral virtues alongside structured processes.

Application of Higher-Order Thinking Skills

Applying Bloom's taxonomy, I analyzed the components of the ECI framework, synthesized its principles with my virtue-centered approach, and evaluated the strengths and limitations of both. This critical assessment underscores the necessity for organizations to balance systematic procedures with moral character development.

For practical application, organizations should integrate the ECI model with virtue ethics by cultivating ethical leaders who exemplify moral virtues, encouraging moral dialogue, and fostering an Ethical Culture that values both procedures and virtues. Such a blended approach promotes both consistency and moral depth, ensuring that ethical policies are not only followed but are genuinely rooted in organizational integrity.

Furthermore, decision-makers must exercise moral imagination by considering broader societal impacts and cultural values, aligning policies with both procedural fairness and virtue ethics. Implementing regular ethics training that emphasizes moral reflection, empathy, and cultural competence supports this comprehensive approach.

Conclusion

Effective ethical frameworks must blend systematic decision-making tools with the cultivation of moral virtues. The ECI’s Ethical Decision-Making Model offers a valuable, structured approach aligned with ethical principles and organizational accountability. However, integrating this model with a virtue-based perspective enhances moral depth, cultural sensitivity, and emotional intelligence. Organizations that foster such a balanced ethical environment will be better equipped to navigate complex moral dilemmas, build stakeholder trust, and promote sustainable ethical practices.

References

  • Balanced Scorecard Institute. (2021). Ethical Decision-Making Framework. Retrieved from https://balancedscorecard.org
  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
  • Harrison, R., & Fiet, J. (2020). Ethical frameworks in organizational decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(1), 1-15.
  • Kidder, R. M. (2005). How Good People Make Tough Choices: Resolving the Dilemmas of Ethical Living. HarperOne.
  • Rhode, D. L. (2017). Moral Leadership and Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(3), 289–295.
  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger Publishers.
  • Schwartz, M. S. (2017). Ethical Decision-Making in Business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(3), 347-370.
  • Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2017). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to Do It Right. Wiley.
  • Volkswagen Case Study: Ethical Failures and Organizational Culture. (2016). Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org
  • Weber, J., & Seiringer, M. (2017). Ethical Organizational Climates: A Review and Future Research Directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(3), 391–410.

Related Assignments