Principles Of Marketing Management Read The Article At The L
Principles Of Marketing Managementread The Article At The Link Below A
Principles of Marketing Management Read the article at the link below and watch the video found in the link. Then, write a thoughtful and well organized answer (words) to 1. is dropping racist brands a response to SWOT analysis done by Pepsi (and other similar companies)? What part of the SWOT are they responding to? Note: there is a rubric attached for grading criteria. Your answer should reflect your own ideas.
Paper For Above instruction
The decision by companies such as Pepsi to drop certain brands perceived as racist or politically sensitive can be interpreted as a strategic response to a SWOT analysis—specifically addressing issues related to threats and weaknesses within their internal and external environments. A SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis serves as a foundational tool for organizations to evaluate their current position, identify potential risks, and leverage opportunities. By discontinuing brands that have become controversial or divisive, companies are primarily responding to external threats and internal weaknesses revealed through their SWOT evaluations.
External threats in SWOT analysis refer to outside factors that could harm an organization’s reputation, profitability, or market position. In this context, societal backlash against racially insensitive branding, or public protests and social media campaigns targeting the brand, constitute significant external threats. Such threats could result in declining sales, damage to brand equity, and broader reputational harm that affects customer trust and loyalty. For instance, protests or negative media coverage about racist branding force firms to reevaluate their market positioning and public perception. Consequently, discontinuing or rebranding offending products becomes a defensive strategy aimed at mitigating these external threats.
On the internal side, weaknesses within the company also prompt responses like dropping brands. If a brand’s image is tarnished due to racist connotations, it can weaken the company’s overall brand portfolio and amplify internal vulnerabilities, such as reduced customer trust or internal conflicts over values and ethics. Removing problematic brands can help restore internal coherence aligned with corporate social responsibility (CSR) goals and improve organizational integrity.
Furthermore, such actions open opportunities to rebrand and reposition in the marketplace, emphasizing inclusivity and social responsibility. These strategic moves align with capturing new market opportunities created by shifting societal values, which favor diversity and equity. The decision to drop racist brands is thus a proactive effort to align the company's brand portfolio with current societal expectations and consumer preferences.
In conclusion, the removal of racist brands by companies like Pepsi primarily addresses external threats identified through SWOT analysis, such as societal backlash and reputational risks, as well as internal weaknesses related to brand image and ethical alignment. This strategic response aims to protect the company's long-term viability and align its values with evolving market expectations. Understanding how SWOT analysis informs these decisions underscores the importance of strategic management in navigating complex social and market dynamics.
References
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Hoeffler, S., & Keller, K. L. (2002). Building strong brand equity. Journal of Marketing Communications, 8(4), 209–220.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
Pickton, D. W., & Wright, S. (1998). What's SWOT in strategic analysis? Strategic Change, 7(2), 101–109.
Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78–93.
Thompson, A. A., Strickland III, A. J., & Gamble, J. E. (2007). Crafting and Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage. McGraw-Hill Education.
Ulrich, D., & Barney, J. (1984). Perspectives in organizations: Resource dependence, efficiency, and population. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 471–481.
Valette-Florence, P., & Ricard, L. (2014). Creating brand awareness: A new perspective on the impact of brand exposure. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(2), 202–218.
Voss, G. B., & Voss, Z. G. (2000). Strategic orientation and firm performance in an artistic environment. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 67–83.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.