Principles Of Microeconomics Problem Set 8 Due 114151 Why Is

Principles Of Microeconomics Problem Set 8 Due 114151 Why Is The D

Principles of Microeconomics Problem Set 8 Due 11/4/. Why is the demand for a resource known as a “derived demand”? (4 points) 2. Explain why a higher elasticity of demand for the finished product leads to a higher elasticity of demand for the resource. (4 points). 3. What, in words, is meant by MRC=MRP? Why is this the decision rule for resource demand? (6 points). 4. Why does a monopsonist face an upward sloping supply curve of labor? How does this affect the number of workers that the monopsonist hires and how much he or she pays them? (6 points)

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The concepts of derived demand, elasticity, marginal revenue product, and monopsony behavior are fundamental in understanding resource allocation within microeconomics. These principles elucidate how firms make decisions regarding resource employment, especially labor, and how market structures influence these decisions. This paper explores each of these topics comprehensively, providing insights into their theoretical underpinnings and practical implications.

Derived Demand in Resources

Derived demand refers to the demand for a resource that arises from the demand for the final good or service produced using that resource. Unlike the demand for consumer goods, which is directly based on consumer preferences, the demand for inputs such as labor or capital depends entirely on the demand for the goods and services they help produce. For instance, if the demand for smartphones increases, the demand for workers in smartphone manufacturing also rises because their labor is essential for producing the final product. This interconnectedness means that the resource's demand is "derived" from the demand for the product, emphasizing its dependency on the market for the finished good. This concept is pivotal in resource economics as it links product markets and factor markets, illustrating how changes in consumer preferences or technological advancements influence employment and resource prices.

Elasticity of Demand for Resources

The elasticity of demand for a resource measures how sensitive the quantity demanded of that resource is to changes in its price. When the demand for the finished product is highly elastic, it signifies that consumers are very responsive to price changes; a small decrease in price leads to a significant increase in demand. Consequently, firms producing that product face an elastic demand curve, which in turn affects the demand for the resources used in production. A higher elasticity of demand for the final good results in a more elastic demand for its inputs because firms are less willing to employ additional resources if they cannot pass increased costs onto consumers without losing sales. Conversely, if demand for the final product is inelastic, firms can more easily pass costs onto consumers without reducing sales, leading to less sensitivity in resource demand. Therefore, elasticity in the product market directly influences the elasticity in resource markets, affecting employment levels and resource prices.

Understanding MRC=MRP

MRC (Marginal Resource Cost) and MRP (Marginal Revenue Product) are critical concepts in resource economics. MRP represents the additional revenue generated from employing one more unit of a resource, calculated as the marginal product of the resource multiplied by the price of the output. MRC, on the other hand, is the additional cost incurred from employing an additional unit of the resource, which, for perfectly competitive factors, equals the price of the resource. The condition MRC=MRP signifies the point at which the cost of hiring an additional unit of a resource equals the revenue it generates. At this equilibrium, the firm maximizes profit by not hiring more resources once the marginal cost exceeds the marginal revenue product. This decision rule ensures optimal resource allocation, as hiring beyond this point would diminish profits, while hiring less would forgo additional profit opportunities. It is fundamental in determining the optimal employment level in resource markets under different market conditions.

Monopsony and Labor Supply

A monopsonist exerts significant market power as the sole or dominant buyer of labor within a market. Unlike competitive markets, where the supply curve of labor is perfectly elastic, a monopsonist faces an upward-sloping labor supply curve. This slope indicates that to hire additional workers, the monopsonist must increase wages not only for the new workers but also for all existing workers, as wages are typically increased for all employed workers to attract additional labor. This necessity to pay a higher wage for each additional worker results in the monopsonist hiring fewer workers than in a competitive market because the marginal expense of hiring an extra worker (the Marginal Factor Cost) exceeds the wage paid to that worker. Consequently, the monopsonist tends to underhire labor and pay lower wages than would prevail in a perfectly competitive scenario. This market inefficiency allows the monopsonist to maintain employment at a lower level, maximizing their individual profit at the expense of workers' well-being.

Conclusion

The principles of derived demand, elasticity, and market structure significantly influence resource employment and pricing. Understanding that resource demand is derived from the demand for final goods highlights the interconnectedness of product and factor markets. Elasticity effects demonstrate how sensitive resource demand is to changes in market conditions, guiding firms in their employment decisions. The MRC=MRP rule ensures profit maximization, serving as a cornerstone of resource economics. Finally, market structures like monopsony illustrate how market power can distort wages and employment levels, emphasizing the importance of competitive markets in promoting optimal resource allocation. These concepts collectively underpin effective resource management and policy formulation aimed at achieving economic efficiency and social welfare.

References

• Blanchard, O., & Johnson, D. R. (2013). Principles of Microeconomics (6th ed.). Pearson.
• McConnell, C. R., Brue, S. L., & Flynn, S. M. (2018). Microeconomics (20th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Mankiw, N. G. (2020). Principles of Economics (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan.
• Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. Macmillan.
• Schmitt, J., & Wadsworth, J. (2006). The Monopsony Model and its Implications for Labor Markets. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 457-472.
• Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Strohl, J. (2010). Help Wanted: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2018. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
• Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). The Inheritance of Inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 23-44.
• Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1994). Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. American Economic Review, 84(4), 772–793.