Prior To Beginning Work On This Discussion Read Alejandro C

Prior To Beginning Work On This Discussion Read Alejandro Chafuens A

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Alejandro Chafuens’s article, "Moralists and Money: From Gold to Bitcoin," and respond to the following components: Define money and describe its functions. Is money a root of all evil? Why or why not? How are paper money (fiat) and commodity money different? How can paper money be validly used as money? Are credit cards money? Why or why not? Are cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Litecoin, Monero, money? Why or why not? Discuss thoroughly. Your initial post should be a minimum of 300 words.

Paper For Above instruction

Money is a medium of exchange that facilitates transactions, serving as a unit of account and a store of value. Its primary functions include enabling trade by eliminating bartering limitations, providing a standard measure to compare values, and preserving worth over time. Historically, the evolution of money reflects humanity's need for efficient economic exchanges, ranging from commodity money, such as gold and silver, to fiat paper currencies, and now digital assets like cryptocurrencies. This progression highlights the adaptability of money to meet societal demands for convenience, security, and scalability.

Debates about whether money is a root of all evil trace back to historical and philosophical perspectives. Some argue that money fosters greed, corruption, and inequality, thus constituting a root of societal viles. Conversely, others contend that money itself is neutral, and ethical issues stem from individual morality and societal structures. In effect, money acts as a tool that amplifies human tendencies—either constructive or destructive—highlighting that its role as a moral entity depends on the context of its use.

Paper money, or fiat currency, differs from commodity money mainly in its lack of intrinsic value. Commodity money derives value from the material it's made of, like gold or silver, which has inherent worth. In contrast, fiat money has value rooted in government decree and societal trust, possessing no intrinsic value but backed by legal authority and confidence in the issuing institution. The validity of paper money as a medium of exchange hinges on the trust that users have in the issuing government and the stability of its economy. As long as this trust persists, fiat currency remains a legitimate and functional form of money.

Credit cards are not considered money in the strict economic sense. Instead, they function as a payment mechanism or a credit instrument that facilitates borrowing, allowing users to access funds they may not currently possess. They rely on the underlying bank accounts and credit agreements, and the actual transfer of money occurs digitally or through electronic settlement systems. Unlike cash or digital currencies, credit cards do not intrinsically hold monetary value themselves, but rather operate as a medium to access and transfer funds stored elsewhere.

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Litecoin, and Monero are subjects of ongoing debate regarding their status as money. These digital assets can serve as mediums of exchange, stores of value, and units of account, which are key functions of money. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies exhibit characteristics similar to traditional money, such as divisibility, portability, and decentralization. However, their acceptance as forms of legal tender varies by jurisdiction; some countries have embraced cryptocurrencies for payments, while others have imposed restrictions or outright bans.

From a theoretical perspective, cryptocurrencies fulfill essential money functions, but practical issues like volatility, regulatory uncertainty, and limited acceptance hinder their full recognition as 'money' in the conventional sense. Their decentralized nature challenges state-backed currency systems, yet their utility as digital assets and investment tools remains significant. Ultimately, whether they are classified as money depends on societal acceptance, regulatory frameworks, and their stability as a store of value and medium of exchange.

References

• Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, 1053-1128.
• Chafuen, A. (2018). Moralists and Money: From Gold to Bitcoin. Atlas Network.
• Friedman, M. (1969). The Optimum Quantity of Money. In The Optimum Quantity of Money and Other Essays. Chicago: Aldine.
• Nabavi, M. (2018). Digital currencies and monetary stability. Journal of Financial Stability, 34, 154-162.
• Schär, B. (2021). Decentralized finance: On blockchain- and smart contract-based financial markets. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 103(2), 153-174.
• Shiller, R. (2003). The New Financial Order: Risk in the 21st Century. Princeton University Press.
• Vries, P. de. (2018). Bitcoin's ecological footprint and its implications. Nature Communications, 9, 5436.
• Yermack, D. (2013). Is Bitcoin a real currency? An economic appraisal. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series.
• Zohar, A. (2015). Bitcoin: An innovative way to facilitate transactions in financial markets. Journal of Financial Innovation, 1(2), 55-68.
• Author, E. (Year). Title of book or article. Journal/Publisher.