Prior To Beginning Work On This Discussion, Read The 430095
Prior To Beginning Work On This Discussion Readthe Stages Of Group De
Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read The Stages of Group Development: A Retrospective Study of Dynamic Team Processes (Links to an external site.) article, watch the 12 Angry Men - Original Live TV Version 1954 (Links to an external site.) film and and The Tuckman Model – Tuckman Team Development Model (Links to an external site.) video which demonstrates the stages of group development. Apply different scenes of the movie or short film to each of the stages of group development as formulated by Tuckman, as discussed in Chapter 2 of Leadership Essentials. Describe at least one lesson that you learned about leading a group through hard times. Your discussion post should be 250 words.
Paper For Above instruction
The process of group development is essential for understanding how teams function and evolve over time. Bruce Tuckman’s model of group development delineates five distinct stages: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Analyzing the film "12 Angry Men" offers valuable insights into these stages and highlights lessons in leadership, especially during challenging times.
The initial stage, forming, is depicted in scenes where jurors initially come together, unsure of each other's personalities and roles. For example, the opening scenes showcase jurors politely introducing themselves, reflecting the tentative nature of this stage. Leading a group through this phase necessitates establishing rapport and clarifying shared goals, which Juror 8 begins to do by advocating for thoughtful deliberation.
The storming stage emerges as conflicts and disagreements surface. In "12 Angry Men," Juror 3’s confrontational behavior and resistance to dissent exemplify this phase. A capable leader must manage conflict constructively and foster open communication. Juror 8 demonstrates patience, encouraging others to express their views and challenging assumptions without escalating tensions.
Norming occurs when jurors start to unify around a cohesive approach. Scenes where jurors share personal stories and develop mutual respect exemplify this stage. Effective leadership during norming involves building consensus and fostering trust. Jurors begin to collaborate more effectively, especially as opinions shift concerning the defendant’s guilt.
The performing stage displays the jurors working efficiently towards a decision. When evidence is debated and biases are overcome, the group operates with greater cohesion. Juror 8’s calm and logical approach exemplifies leadership that guides the team toward resolution, even amidst resistance.
Finally, adjourning involves the completion of the task and disengagement. While less emphasized in "12 Angry Men," the jurors’ eventual unanimous decision signifies the culmination of their group process.
A key lesson learned is the importance of patience and empathy in leadership during tough times. A leader must remain calm, listen actively, and foster a safe environment where dissenting voices are heard. This approach not only resolves conflicts but also strengthens team cohesion, ultimately leading to effective decision-making in high-pressure situations.
References
- Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2019). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (12th ed.). Pearson.
- Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
- Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin.
- Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Harvard Business School Publishing.
- Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that Gets Results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78–90.
- Lencioni, P. (2002). The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. Jossey-Bass.
- Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development re-visited. Group & Organization Studies, 2(4), 419–427.
- Cohen, S., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290.
- Wheelan, S. A. (2013). Creating Effective Teams: A Guide for Members and Leaders (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.