Probability Distributions 1 And 2

Probability Distributions1probability Distributions2probability Di

Probability Distributions Bindusree Polineni BADM-707 The findings of two hypothetical polls on browser choice in 2000 and 2010 were used to show how few of the county tactics differ. I'm actually residing in the state of Minnesota in the United States. To see the Z Scores and Probability Distributions, I've selected the following three counties: state name Minnesota Carver County Minnesota Crow Wing County Minnesota Hennepin County About 30 miles west of Minneapolis, MN, is Carver County, which has a total land area of 357 square miles. Eleven cities and seven counties make up the metropolitan area, which is nevertheless home to a mix of urban and rural residents. Crow Wing County is a Minnesota county located in the state's east central region. There were 62,500 residents in the city according to the most recent U.S. Census data. Brainerd is the county seat in the state of Minnesota. Three counties' worth of data are analyzed to see how widely distributed or varied they are. Variation is the degree to which the values differ from one another. Values that are near to each other in a data collection have a reduced variation measure. When performing the graphical analysis for each variable, values that are more widely separated have larger measures of variation. A Z-score, a numerical expression of the value's relationship to the firm's mean, is a widely used statistical metric. Z-scores are calculated using standard deviations from the mean. (Lane, nd). This means that the data point has the same score as the mean score, if it has a Z-score of 0. Due to its dependence on units of measurement, comparing standard deviations across various populations or sets of data can be challenging. The standard deviation is expressed as a percentage of the sample or population mean by the coefficient of variation. The probabilities that I randomly chosen from the state of Minnesota and the county in which I currently reside Additional counties have been added to my Z-score comparison. References Lane, D. Open Access!: Review of Open Access!: Review of Online Statistics: An Interactive Multimedia Course of Study by David Lane by David Lane. 5/21/22, 9:30 PM Preview Rubric: 2.2 Assignment (20 points) - 3SU2022 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01A) - Indiana Wesleyan University 1/2 2.2 Assignment (20 points) Course: 3SU2022 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01A) Criteria Excellent Competent Inadequate/Failing Criterion Score Quality of the Content / 1010 points Thoroughly addresses the prompt(s). Clearly demonstrates understanding of relevant course concepts using course materials and additional resources (with citations and references). Provides clear evidence of critical thinking. 9 points Adequately addresses the prompt(s). Demonstrates a basic understanding of relevant course concepts using course materials and additional resources (with citations and references). Proficient explanation for why the research matters. 7 points Partially addresses the prompt(s) or addresses only some of the prompts. Demonstrates a limited understanding of relevant course concepts using course materials and additional resources (with citations and references). Emergent explanation for why the research matters. 6 points Minimally addresses or does not address the prompt(s). Does not adequately demonstrate an understandign of relevant course concepts or provide evidence of critical thinking. Inadequate explanation for why the research matters. 5/21/22, 9:30 PM Preview Rubric: 2.2 Assignment (20 points) - 3SU2022 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01A) - Indiana Wesleyan University 2/2 Total / 20 Overall Score Criteria Excellent Competent Inadequate/Failing Inadequate/Failing Criterion Score Written Communication & APA / 1010 points Excellent communication when applying English Grammar Standards and the 7 C's of writing: clear, concise, complete, correct, correlated to the research, creative, and with critical thinking evidenced. 9 points Proficient communication when applying English Grammar Standards and the 7 C's of writing: clear, concise, complete, correct, correlated to the research, creative, and with critical thinking evidenced. 7 points Emergent communication when applying English Grammar Standards and the 7 C's of writing: clear, concise, complete, correct, correlated to the research, creative, and with critical thinking evidenced. 6 points Inadequate communication when applying English Grammar Standards and the 7 C's of writing: clear, concise, complete, correct, correlated to the research, creative, and with critical thinking evidenced. Inadequate use of APA formatting standards, as applicable. 5/21/22, 8:17 PM Preview Rubric: 2.2 Assignment (75 Points) - 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) - Indiana Wesleyan University 1/4 2.2 Assignment (75 Points) Course: 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) Criteria Excellent Competent Inadequate/Failing Criterion Score Comparison of three variables / 20 Statistical tools / points Demonstrated clear, insightful critical thinking in discussing the similarities and differences between the three variables. 19 points (16-19 Points) Demonstrated competent critical thinking in discussing the similarities and differences between the three variables. 15 points (12-15 Points) Demonstrated limited critical thinking in discussing the similarities and differences between the three variables. 11 points (0-11 Points) Demonstrated little to no critical thinking in discussing the similarities and differences between the three variables. 20 points Statistical tools were constructed correctly and strongly supported the discussion. 18 points (16-18 Points) Statistical tools were constructed correctly and generally supported the discussion. 15 points (12-15 Points) Statistical tools were constructed correctly but did not support the discussion. 11 points (0-11 Points) Statistical tools were not constructed correctly and did not support the discussion. 5/21/22, 8:17 PM Preview Rubric: 2.2 Assignment (75 Points) - 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) - Indiana Wesleyan University 2/4 Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Inadequate/Faili ng Criterion Score Assessment of normality, Z score and probability calculation / 2020 points Demonstrated clear, insightful critical thinking in the assessment of normality and determining the z score and probability calculation for each of the three variables. 19 points (16-19 Points) Demonstrated competent critical thinking in the assessment of normality an determining the z score and probability calculation for each of the three variables. 15 points (12-15 Points) Demonstrated limited critical thinking in the assessment of normality an determining the z score and probability calculation for each of the three variables. 11 points (0-11 Points) Demonstrated little to no critical thinking in the assessment of normality and determining the z score and probability calculation for each of the three variables.. 5/21/22, 8:17 PM Preview Rubric: 2.2 Assignment (75 Points) - 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) - Indiana Wesleyan University 3/4 Total / 75 Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Inadequate/Faili ng Criterion Score Grammar, Spelling, Length, and Citation / 1515 points Sentence structure is complete with correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization, varied diction, and word choices. Assignment length is correct with sources correctly cited. 14 points (12-14 Points) Sentence structure has minor errors (fragments, run-ons) with correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and limited diction and word choices. Assignment length is correct with sources correctly cited. 11 points (9-11 Points) Sentence structure has several errors in sentence fluency with multiple fragments/run- ons; poor spelling, punctuation, and/or word choice. Assignment length is inappropriate with several format and citation errors. 8 points (0-8 Points) Sentence structure has serious and persistent errors in sentence fluency, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation, and/or word choice. Assignment length is inappropriate with several format and citation errors or sources not cited. 5/21/22, 8:17 PM Preview Rubric: 2.2 Assignment (75 Points) - 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) - Indiana Wesleyan University 4/4 Overall Score Excellent 69 points minimum Competent 61 points minimum Needs Improvement 54 points minimum Inadequate/Failing 0 points minimumSet at 92% - which is lowest A. Set at 82% - which is lowest B. Set at 72% - which is lowest C. Set at 0

Paper For Above instruction

The task involves analyzing probability distributions and Z-scores for data from three counties in Minnesota: Carver County, Crow Wing County, and Hennepin County. The goal is to understand how data points relate to their respective means and distribute across the populations by calculating Z-scores, comparing variability, and evaluating the normality of data distributions. This analysis helps illustrate the concepts of variation, standard deviations, and probability calculations within the context of real-world geographic data.

To undertake this analysis, data such as land area, population size, and other relevant variables from the selected counties are essential. Carver County, located west of Minneapolis with a mix of urban and rural areas, covers 357 square miles. Crow Wing County, in east-central Minnesota, has a population of approximately 62,500 residents. Hennepin County, which includes Minneapolis, is a key urban center with higher population density and diverse demographic characteristics.

The statistical process begins with data exploration and graphical analysis to assess the distributional characteristics of each county’s data. Calculating the mean and standard deviation for each variable provides the foundation for converting raw data points into Z-scores. The Z-score formula is given by:

Z = (X - μ) / σ

where X is a data point, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. The Z-score indicates how many standard deviations a data point is away from the mean, with a Z-score of 0 representing a value exactly at the mean. This standardization allows comparisons across different populations or variables, despite differences in units of measurement.

Further, the coefficient of variation (CV), which expresses the standard deviation as a percentage of the mean, provides insight into the relative variability of the data in each county. High CV indicates more dispersion relative to the mean, whereas low CV suggests data points are more clustered around the mean.

Probabilities for specific data points can be estimated using normal distribution assumptions and Z-scores, often by referencing standard normal distribution tables or using statistical software. In analyzing the data, it is critical to assess the normality assumption’s validity since Z-scores and probability calculations are most accurate when the data approximate a normal distribution.

The analysis yields valuable insights into the variability and distribution of demographic or geographic data across the counties, aiding understanding of regional similarities and differences. These insights can be significant for regional planning, resource allocation, and understanding demographic trends over time.

Ultimately, this exercise demonstrates fundamental statistical concepts—variation, standardization, and probability—in a real-world context, emphasizing the importance of thorough data analysis and interpretation in geographic and demographic research.

References

  • Lane, D. (n.d.). Online Statistics: An Interactive Multimedia Course of Study. Retrieved from https://onlinestatbook.com
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). Minnesota County Demographics. Retrieved from https://census.gov
  • Everitt, B. S., & Hothorn, T. (2011). An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis with R. Springer.
  • Wasserman, L. (2004). All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference. Springer.
  • McClave, J. T., & Sincich, T. (2018). Statistical Techniques (13th ed.). Pearson.
  • Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.
  • Mooney, C. Z., & Duval, R. D. (1993). Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference. Sage.
  • Sheskin, D. J. (2011). Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. CRC Press.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
  • Ott, R. L., & Longnecker, M. (2010). An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis (6th ed.). Brooks/Cole.

Related Assignments