Problem Documentation: The Problem Is That 45% Of African Am

Problem Documentation The Problem Is That 45 Of African American Th

The problem is that 45% of African American third-grade boys who are emotionally handicapped are scoring 60% or lower on daily math assignments. Obtain information to verify that a problem exists and to clarify the nature of the problem. Create a sample 10-item survey with questions or information that would assist you with your research. Indicate the group(s) that would be surveyed, a brief rationale for surveying each group, the major elements of the problem that you want to explore and verify, and your 10 questions.

Paper For Above instruction

The persistent underperformance of African American third-grade boys with emotional disabilities in mathematics presents a significant educational concern that warrants thorough investigation. Specifically, evidence suggests that a substantial 45% of this demographic are scoring 60% or lower on daily math assignments, signaling potential systemic, pedagogical, or socio-emotional barriers impacting their academic success. To address this, it is essential to validate the extent and nature of the problem through targeted research methods, including the development of a comprehensive survey designed to gather relevant data from key stakeholder groups.

Verifying the existence and scope of the problem involves engaging with multiple groups directly or indirectly involved in the educational experiences of these students. The primary groups to survey include the students themselves, their parents or guardians, classroom teachers, special education staff, and school administrators. Each group provides unique insights into various facets of the issue, such as student engagement, emotional wellbeing, instructional practices, and institutional support systems.

The rationale for surveying students is rooted in understanding their personal perspectives on learning challenges, motivation, and emotional states. Surveys with parents or guardians can shed light on home environments, cultural factors, and support mechanisms that influence student performance. Teachers and special education staff are critical for identifying instructional strategies, classroom dynamics, and resource adequacy. Administrators provide context regarding school policies, interventions, and overall support frameworks.

Essential elements of the problem that the survey aims to explore include: the emotional and behavioral factors affecting math learning, the effectiveness of current instructional approaches, the availability and utilization of support services, socio-economic influences, and potential biases or systemic issues within the educational setting.

The following is a sample 10-item survey crafted to gather pertinent data:

1. On a scale of 1 to 5, how confident do you feel about your ability to understand math assignments? (Students)
2. What do you find most challenging about math assignments? (Students)
3. How often do you experience feelings of frustration or anxiety when working on math tasks? (Students)
4. Does your child or you receive additional support or tutoring for math? If yes, what kind? (Parents/Guardians)
5. How do classroom activities and teaching methods help or hinder your child's learning in math? (Teachers)
6. Are there specific emotional or behavioral issues that interfere with students’ math learning? Please specify. (Teachers/Staff)
7. What resources are available in your school to support students struggling with math? (Administrators)
8. How effective do you believe the current strategies are in meeting the needs of students with emotional and learning challenges? (Administrators)
9. In your opinion, what are the main barriers preventing this group from achieving higher math scores? (All groups)
10. What additional support or resources do you think could improve math performance for these students? (All groups)

This multipronged survey approach aims to capture a holistic picture of the barriers faced, identify areas for targeted intervention, and verify whether systemic issues or specific emotional and cognitive factors primarily contribute to the low math achievement among these students. By analyzing responses, educators and policymakers can develop data-driven strategies to bridge the achievement gap and foster an equitable learning environment.

References

• Allensworth, E. M., & Easton, J. Q. (2007). What Matters for Stay-In School? A Review of the Research on Factors Influencing Student Persistence. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
• Burchinal, M., & Peisner-Feinberg, E. (2002). Head Start performance standards and program accountability: The challenge of classroom quality. Zero to Three, 23(2), 3-8.
• Ferguson, R. F. (2003). Teachers' perceptions and expectations and the black-white test score gap. Urban Education, 38(4), 460-507.
• Ginsburg, H. P., & Golbeck, S. L. (2004). Mathematics education for children with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 29(2), 127-139.
• Hinshaw, S. P. (2002). Externalizing behavior problems and teacher-child relationships: Interactions and implications for interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10(2), 91-102.
• Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2007). Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC-3). Pearson.
• Kozol, J. (1991). Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools. Crown Publishers.
• Osher, D., Bear, G. G., Sprague, J., & Walnut, T. (2010). Practical strategies for teaching students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 33(3), 385-414.
• Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial adversity: Risk, resilience, and recovery. Management of Children at Risk, 63-86.
• Weissberg, R. P., & Cascarino, J. (2013). Academic Social and Emotional Learning (SEL): Evidence, Practice, and Policy. The GSERIC Journal, 1(1), 4-12.