Procedia Economics And Finance 2012; Pages 415-419

Procedia Economics And Finance 3 2012 415 4192212 6716 201

Procedia Economics And Finance 3 2012 415 4192212 6716 201

Under the circumstances of a competitive economy, organizations are increasingly focused on enhancing their recruitment and selection processes to attract top talent. A critical component influencing successful recruitment is organizational reputation, especially during the interview process. The paper explores how organizations can strategically promote their reputation during hiring interviews to improve candidate attraction and acceptance rates.

The labor market operates under conditions of equilibrium and disequilibrium, influenced by complex relationships and demand-supply dynamics. In a tight labor market, characterized by high demand and limited supply of skilled candidates, organizations face fierce competition. Recruitment becomes not merely about filling vacancies but about attracting individuals whose values and perceptions align with organizational attributes.

The selection interview serves as a key tool in this process. An interview is more than an interrogation; it is a purposeful conversation designed to assess a candidate’s qualifications, personal qualities, and fit within the organization. Moreover, this interaction offers organizations the opportunity to shape their external image through strategic communication, thereby influencing candidate perceptions and decisions.

Organizational reputation, distinct from identity, is the external perception of an organization’s attributes as acknowledged by outsiders. Maintaining and promoting a positive reputation can significantly enhance an organization’s attractiveness to desirable candidates. A strong reputation acts as a signal of organizational quality and stability, influencing candidates' perception of potential fit and future prospects.

The paper emphasizes that reputation can be multidimensional, with different facets such as product quality, employee treatment, customer relations, and corporate social responsibility. Candidates evaluate these facets when forming their perceptions. For highly skilled or talented candidates, reputation becomes a decisive factor, often outweighing other considerations such as salary or benefits.

During recruitment interviews, using persuasion tactics to convey a positive reputation is crucial. These tactics involve strategic communication behaviors aimed at aligning external perceptions with the authentic attributes of the organization. Interviewers who promote dimensions of reputation that candidates value—such as organizational stability, opportunities for growth, or ethical practices—are more likely to induce acceptance of job offers.

Further, candidate perceptions depend significantly on their human capital. Candidates with higher human capital often have greater employment options and are less susceptible to organizational reputation influences. Conversely, candidates perceiving fewer opportunities tend to rely more heavily on organizational reputation when making decisions.

The paper also discusses the importance of person-organization fit. Reputable organizations attract candidates with high person-organization matching, leading to lower turnover and higher job satisfaction. Effective promotion of reputation during recruitment enhances the attractiveness for such candidates, especially when combined with realistic job previews that set accurate expectations.

Reputation also affects the applicant’s decision-making based on their motivation and reasoning style. Applicants with a high need for reasoning respond more positively to elaborated and sincere efforts to promote organizational reputation. This underscores the importance of tailoring communication strategies to individual candidate profiles to optimize recruitment outcomes.

The interaction between perceived reputation and candidate attributes, such as their perception of opportunities and personal values, influences the final decision. Candidates who perceive an organization as holding attributes aligned with their own values are more likely to accept offers.

In conclusion, organizations operating in competitive labor markets must develop strategic recruitment practices that actively promote and maintain a strong organizational reputation. This not only attracts qualified candidates but also enhances the likelihood of acceptance and long-term retention. Effective reputation management during interviews involves deliberate use of persuasive communication focusing on dimensions valued by candidates, aligning perceptions with actual organizational attributes, and fostering a positive self-image among staff to reinforce external perceptions.

References

• Craif, M. (2001). Metoda interviului în psihologia organizației a resurselor umane. Iași: Polirom Publishing House.
• Dawson, R. (2006). Secretele persuasiunii. Iași: Polirom Publishing House.
• Ferris, G., Berkson, H., Harris, M. (2002). The recruitment interview process. Elsevier Science Inc.
• Gass, R., Seiter, J. (2009). Manual de persuasiune. Iași: Polirom Publishing House.
• Hodgson, S. (2006). Interviul de angajare. Iași: Polirom Publishing House.
• Pastor, I., Petelean, A. (2006). Managementul resurselor umane. Cluj-Napoca: Risoprint Publishing House.
• Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Harvard Business School Press.
• Fombrun, C., & Rindova, V. (2000). The building blocks of organizational reputation: Definitions, antecedents, and consequences. In Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 1-60.
• Turban, D., & Greening, D. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.
• Fombrun, C., & Van Riel, C. (2004). Fame & Reputation Management. Prentice Hall.