Procurement And Contract Strategy For Road Realignment

Procurement and Contract Strategy for Road Realignment and Petrol Station

Procurement and Contract Strategy for Road Realignment and Petrol Station

You are tasked with preparing a procurement and contract strategy and a strategic method statement for the construction of the road realignment, fuel area (pumps, tanks, and canopy), retail unit, carwash, and associated amenities (air compressor/vacuum). It is proposed that the work be carried out in several phases including demolition of existing buildings and enabling works, groundworks and fuel tanks, fuel pump bases and canopy, retail units and car wash, and upgrading of the level crossing. You are required to develop a procurement and contract strategy detailing the type of procurement process recommended and the parties involved, including justification for your choices. Additionally, prepare a strategic method statement covering the key phases of the construction programme, assumptions about resources, and project management considerations, within a 6-page limit.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The development of a comprehensive procurement and contract strategy is critical to the successful delivery of complex infrastructure projects such as a road realignment, petrol station, and associated amenities. Given the scope, budget, and phased approach, selecting an appropriate procurement process ensures cost efficiency, effective risk management, and collaborative stakeholder engagement. Paired with a detailed strategic method statement, these elements form the backbone of the project’s successful execution within the stipulated 100-day timeline.

Procurement and Contract Strategy

The recommended procurement strategy for this project is a two-stage Design and Build (D&B) approach, complemented by a partnering or collaborative contract. The decision to adopt D&B stems from its advantages in integrating design and construction, fostering innovation, reducing project timelines, and providing cost certainty, especially critical under the tight 100-day schedule.

For this infrastructure, a competitive tender process based on a fully specified scope would be appropriate. Pre-qualification of contractors would ensure that only capable, experienced parties with relevant infrastructure and civil engineering expertise participate, reducing risks associated with subcontractor performance and ensuring quality standards are met.

The main parties involved include:

  • Client: Shell plc, overseeing the project and funding
  • Design Consultants: responsible for design development and value engineering
  • Construction Contractor: responsible for execution of phases including demolition, earthworks, civils, and installation of infrastructure
  • Suppliers: fuel tanks, pumps, canopy, retail units, plant, and materials
  • Project Management Team: overseeing schedule, cost, and compliance
  • Local Authorities & Utilities: coordination on permits, planning, and utility disconnections/relocations

The contractual form recommended is an NEC3 or NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC). This contract promotes collaborative working, clear risk allocation, and flexibility, suitable for phased, multi-discipline work, and aligns well with the client’s objectives of cost control and timely delivery.

Justification of Procurement Strategy

The D&B procurement process simplifies project delivery by consolidating design and construction risks with the contractor, reducing interface conflicts, and enabling quicker decision-making. Given the phased nature, D&B allows for flexible mobilization and potential early works, such as demolition and enabling works, under different contracts if necessary.

Choosing a competitive tender ensures market engagement with capable firms, encouraging competitive pricing and innovation. The NEC contractual framework incentivizes good project management, minimizes disputes, and encourages collaborative problem solving, crucial for maintaining the tight schedule and budget constraints.

Strategic Method Statement

1. Project Planning and Mobilization

Prior to commencement, thorough planning involves detailed site surveys, resource scheduling (labour, plant, materials), and stakeholder coordination, especially with utilities and local authorities. Mobilization includes setting up site offices, health and safety arrangements, and logistics planning.

2. Demolition and Enabling Works

The first phase involves safely demolishing small shed buildings, removing existing infrastructure, and installing site fencing and signage. This phase establishes the working environment for subsequent phases. Proper sequencing minimizes disruption and ensures safety.

3. Groundworks and Installation of Fuel Tanks

This phase involves earthworks, excavation for fuel tanks, and foundations. Tanks are installed with appropriate safety measures and environmental considerations. Concurrently, utilities and drainage are connected, ensuring compliance with regulations.

4. Construction of Fuel Pump Bases, Canopy, and Retail Units

Following groundworks, the installation of fuel pumps, canopy, and retail units occurs. Prefabricated components expedite construction. Quality assurance protocols validate installations against design specifications. This stage also covers the construction of the car wash and amenities like air compressors and vacuum stations.

5. Road Realignment and Level Crossing Upgrades

Concurrent with site infrastructure, the road realignment is executed, involving earthworks, paving, and signaling modifications. The level crossing upgrade incorporates safety enhancements, gates, and communication systems, executed with minimal disruption to traffic flow.

6. Final Inspection, Commissioning, and Handover

Testing of fuel systems, safety measures, and electrical installations ensures operational readiness. Client inspections verify compliance. The project concludes with site redevelopment, cleanup, and official handover, followed by documentation and maintenance schedules.

Resource Assumptions and Timeline

Labor resources comprise skilled civil engineers, civil operatives, electrical technicians, and safety personnel. Equipment includes excavators, concrete mixers, fuel tank handling gear, and paving machinery. Materials involve mobile crane supports, concrete, asphalt, fuel tank components, and prefabricated units.

Based on project scope—demolition, groundwork, construction, and commissioning—the phases are sequenced to maximize efficiency within the 100-day window, with critical activities overlapping where feasible. Regular progress reviews and contingency planning are integral to managing unforeseen delays.

Risk Management

Key risks include delays in permit approvals, utility disconnections, adverse weather, accidents, and supply chain disruptions. These are mitigated through early stakeholder engagement, detailed scheduling, safety protocols, and supplier pre-qualifications.

Conclusion

This procurement and strategic method plan emphasizes integrated project delivery through a collaborative D&B approach supported by a detailed phased execution strategy. It aims to optimize resource utilization, mitigate risks, and ensure project completion within the prescribed budget and timeframe, aligning with Shell plc’s requirements and industry best practices.

References

  • Barlow, J., & Davis, K. (2008). "Procurement Strategies in Construction projects." Construction Management and Economics, 26(4), 385–394.
  • NEC. (2017). NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC). NEC.
  • Bowers, J., & Josephson, P. (2019). "Collaborative Contracting Approaches for Infrastructure Projects." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(8), 04019049.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2017). "High-profile mega-projects: what went wrong and how to prevent it." Project Management Journal, 38(4), 960–969.
  • Forest, D., & Williams, T. (2020). "Effective Risk Management in Construction Procurement." International Journal of Project Management, 38(3), 185-203.
  • Hancher, M., & Molenaar, K. (2016). "Design-Build Delivery: A Risk-Managed Approach." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(6), 04016007.
  • Li, H., & Akintoye, A. (2012). "Stakeholder Management in Construction Projects." International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 683-701.
  • Thomsen, M. R., & van der Vorm, P. (2018). "Implementing Phased Construction Strategies." Construction Innovation, 18(2), 142-159.
  • Walker, D. H. T. (2019). "Contract Strategy for Infrastructure Development." Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering and Construction Publications, 172(3), 135–146.
  • Winch, G. (2010). "Managing Construction Projects." Wiley-Blackwell.

Related Assignments