Procurement Contracting Process Analysis ✓ Solved

PROCUREMENT CONTRACTING PROCESS ANALYSIS

A procurement contract is a formal agreement with a business entity to secure particular goods and services which comply with the procurement policies. Will Fence has a budget of $50,000, and therefore the most effective procurement contract type to be used would be a fixed price contract more specifically, the Firm Fixed Price Contract.

To start the procurement process which will lead into the contract process for the tree farm, first the team will need to assign a purchasing agent. The purchasing agent role is to watch over the process of gathering the contracts for procurement and make sure that they are being validated, the correct price, have suitable needs for the project, and then make sure that the contracts are closed. To begin, the purchasing agent will have a inspection sheet of vendors to review. During this interview process the purchasing agent will ask the vendors a series of questions regarding costs, portfolios of past projects, warranty periods, and refund processes. The purchasing agent will then sign contracts with the chosen vendors and consistently monitor the funds spent in congruence with the work being established.

While monitoring, the purchasing agent will function any change order requests to identify mistakes made in the contracts. Negotiating different deals for the farm will be a monumental task, thus various protocols are put in place to ensure that all deliveries are met within a graceful time span. Once the procurement and contract process comes to a close, the purchasing agent will review any last minute changes that need to be made to ensure that expectations are met for key stakeholders. Initially, there will be several audits after the overall review of the procurement process, double checking the pass and fail mechanisms established for several vendors. Finally, there will be an overall compliance survey and payment confirmation/termination for the vendors, ensuring that the work was executed correctly, in order to authorize payment.

The first step to successfully negotiating a contract is to have a plan. The plan procurement process allows the buyer (Will) to negotiate associated costs while still receiving high levels of service. It involves creating a project management plan that identifies key inputs such as make-or-buy analysis and market research. Make-or-buy inputs determine which resources can be produced in-house as opposed to being purchased externally. Market research explores industry-specific capabilities of potential vendors, aiding in identifying market capabilities. Comprehensive knowledge of existing resources significantly impacts the negotiation agreements between buyer and seller.

The project management plan is based on analysis requirements for the project and consulting documents such as the project schedule and risk register. This information allows sellers to provide detailed information to buyers about the project scope. Additionally, the plan procurement process addresses the various types of contracts, with fixed-price contracts being best when the project scope is clearly defined and having more inherent risk for the seller. Cost-reimbursable contracts work best when the scope remains unclear or subject to change, thereby allowing the buyer to assume more of the risk. Time and materials (T&M) contracts are often used when a precise statement of work cannot be readily created, sharing risks more equally between buyer and seller.

The proposed plan for procurement and contracting is likely the most efficient for both pricing and scheduling. Securing materials such as fence posts at cost ensures the lowest expenditure while maintaining quality appropriate for the expected weather conditions. Although more durable posts can be sought after, doing so may strain or exceed the budget. Involving an outside agency for land acquisition may confer future tax exemptions beneficial to the client. The expected outcomes from the proposed plan will facilitate an extension of productivity areas for goods produced within the set budget, incorporating a safety margin of fifteen percent. Workers will also be needed, with recruitment methods aligning with client objectives. This optimized plan is well within the budgetary constraints provided.

The role of risk management in the procurement process is continuous, as it is critical to the successful operation of purchasing and supply chains. Procurement processes face several risks including quality, delivery, fraud, and costs. If contractors are provided $50,000 for designing and completing the tree farm, their failure to deliver quality work may represent a significant procurement risk. Commonly utilized risk treatment options such as avoidance, transfer, reduction, and acceptance can help prevent future threats. Supplier and compliance risks are likewise inherent to procurement. Understanding the procurement and contract process can mitigate associated risks significantly.

Will Fence should consider several key aspects during the procurement process. Once the scope of work has been established within a statement of work containing all tasks to be completed, the procurement phase is deemed complete. The scheduling aspect is vital to avoid conflicts with Will’s business operations, especially since August and September mark the busy seasons for the company. Scheduling should occur at the end of the active season, concluding at the start of the next working season. Winter and spring months are ideal for performing the majority of the work, particularly due to favorable weather conditions for deliverables. Quality monitoring of completed work and adherence to schedule are essential for finalizing the procurement plan.

Paper For Above Instructions

Procurement contracting is a critical element in the management of business operations that involves safeguarding the acquisition of goods and services necessary to achieve specific objectives. This analysis focuses on the procurement process relevant to the project undertaken by Will Fence for an external tree farm initiative. Given the budget constraint of $50,000, the suitability of employing a fixed-price contract, particularly the Firm Fixed Price Contract (FFP), is emphasized. The significance of a structured procurement process, coupled with a thorough understanding of risk management, enhances the likelihood of successful project completion.

The procurement process begins with the assignment of a purchasing agent responsible for overseeing all aspects of contract acquisition, validation, vendor communication, and contract closure. The purchasing agent serves as the linchpin of the procurement process, ensuring that all operations align with project requirements and compliance standards.

Upon identifying potential vendors, the purchasing agent utilizes an inspection sheet for evaluation. This critical stage assesses vendor reliability by addressing essential inquiries about service costs, previous project experiences, warranty agreements, and refund policies. Based on insights gleaned from vendor interactions, the agent will select suitable contracts and maintain oversight over budget expenditures. The ability to effectively manage expenditures against deliverables is essential for performance accountability.

Crucial to the procurement successfully is the negotiation phase. The necessity of establishing a strategic procurement plan cannot be overstated, as it outlines the framework for negotiations regarding pricing and service quality. The plan involves the completion of a project management document delineating critical inputs such as make-or-buy analysis and market research. These facets provide an understanding of resource allocation and prospective vendor capabilities, creating a basis for informed negotiation.

Understanding fixed-price, cost-reimbursable, and T&M contracts proves instrumental during negotiations—these contract types dictate how risks are distributed between the buyer and seller. Fixed-price contracts present an advantage when the project scope is well-defined; however, responsibilities associated with quality assurance fall more heavily on the vendor. Conversely, cost-reimbursable contracts afford more flexibility in scope modification, yet impose greater risk on the buyer.

Risk management is a continual process, necessary for validating the success of the procurement initiative. Identifying procurement risks, such as quality failures and delivery discrepancies, is essential for establishing mitigation strategies. When vendors are provided funds upfront, they are expected to deliver high-quality work; therefore, recognizing potential quality risks will inform the development of effective preventive measures. Utilizing risk treatment methodologies—avoidance, transference, reduction, and acceptance—will guide decision-making throughout procurement lifecycle.

As the procurement process evolves, it is essential to conduct audits to assess compliance with established guidelines. These audits serve to evaluate vendor performance and compliance with expected deliverables. Compliance assessments ensure that contractors adhere to contract terms and satisfactory work standards for payment confirmation and termination processes.

In conclusion, maintaining a comprehensive understanding of the procurement contracting process is paramount for successful execution within the confines of Will Fence’s budgetary limits. Each element encompassing negotiation, risk management, and compliance contributes to a streamlined procurement process. It is this multifaceted understanding that will foster Will Fence’s capacity to navigate the complexities of contractual agreements, thereby extending productivity and enhancing operational profitability in the long term.

References

• Crawshaw, G. (2017). Supply Management: The Top Six Challenges Facing Procurement.
• Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. Cengage Learning.
• Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing Must Become Supply Management. Harvard Business Review.
• Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2014). Operations Management. Pearson.
• Schmidt, C. (2016). Strategic Sourcing: From Vendor to Partner. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management.
• Kauffman, R. J., & Porter, D. A. (2020). A Behavior Approach to Risk Management. International Journal of Project Management.
• Geoffrion, A. M., & Krishnan, R. (2009). Risk Management in Procurement: Issues and Best Practices. Journal of Supply Chain Management.
• Zsidisin, G. A., & Ritchie, B. (2008). Supply Chain Risk Management: A View from the Trenches. International Journal of Production Economics.
• Weber, L. J., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2015). Firm Risk Management: A Perspective from the Supply Chain. Journal of Business Research.
• Watson, G., & Kadala, D. (2019). The Role of Supplier Relationships in Supply Chain Risk Management. Journal of Business Logistics.