Professional Interview And Response Guidelines

Professional Interview And Response Guidelinesthe Following Guidelines

The following guidelines must be followed when completing the Professional Interview and Response assignment, including accepted modes of interview, methods of interviewee selection, interviewee criteria, communication with the interviewee, and additional considerations regarding confidentiality and compensation.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of conducting a professional interview pertinent to mental health services requires careful planning and adherence to specific guidelines to ensure the collection of valuable and ethical insights. This paper outlines the recommended procedures for selecting interviewees, establishing contact, obtaining informed consent, and conducting the interview, with a focus on maintaining professionalism and respecting confidentiality within academic boundaries.

Modes of Interviewing

Various modes of conducting an interview are acceptable, including in person, via email, telephone, or other internet-based platforms. The choice of method should align with the interviewer’s resources and the interviewee’s convenience. For example, online video conferencing can facilitate face-to-face interaction while maintaining safety considerations, especially in the context of ongoing health concerns or geographic limitations.

Methods of Interviewee Selection

Potential interviewees can be identified through numerous channels such as word of mouth, personal associations, internet searches, print media advertisements, or other outreach strategies. This broad approach increases the likelihood of engaging qualified individuals with diverse perspectives in mental health practices. Selecting interviewees through multiple channels ensures a representative sample of mental health providers.

Interviewee Criteria

Core criteria for interviewees include: one must be a licensed clinical psychologist with over five years of active practice, providing a rich source of seasoned clinical insight. The second interviewee can be either licensed or license-eligible mental health professionals, such as drug and alcohol counselors, clinical social workers, licensed professional counselors, marriage and family therapists, psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, or psychological assistants. Importantly, the second interviewee must not be a graduate student, ensuring that the responses reflect professional experience rather than academic training.

Communication With Interviewees

When reaching out to potential interviewees, the student must clearly communicate that they are enrolled in a University of Phoenix degree program and that the purpose of the interview is solely for academic purposes related to an assignment. The interviewee should be informed that their responses will be used for educational analysis and that confidentiality cannot be guaranteed, as the data will be housed in a university database and shared publicly for academic review. The anticipated duration of the interview is approximately 30 minutes to one hour, and the student must clarify that there is no expectation for the interviewee to pay for their time.

Additional Considerations

If a potential interviewee requests compensation for their participation, the student can choose to locate another candidate without obligation. The student is not required to disclose personal information during the interview; the interaction is strictly for the academic project. Any subsequent relationship with the interviewee outside this scope is purely at the discretion of the student and is not connected to the university, emphasizing the importance of maintaining professional boundaries and ethical conduct throughout the process.

Conclusion

Adhering to these guidelines ensures that the professional interview process is conducted ethically, efficiently, and respectfully, providing meaningful insights into mental health practices while safeguarding the interests of all parties involved. Proper planning, clear communication, and adherence to confidentiality standards are essential components of a successful academic interview in the field of mental health services.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 75(9), 1232-1243.
• Council of State Governments. (2017). Licensing requirements for mental health professionals. State Government Publications.
• Johnson, S. M., & Nelson, J. (2015). Conducting effective qualitative interviews in mental health research. Qualitative Health Research, 25(3), 349-358.
• Molnar, B. E., & Knight, C. (2017). Ethical issues in interviewing mental health professionals. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 39(2), 102-115.
• National Board for Certified Counselors. (2019). Standards for counselor identity and conduct. NBCC.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Seidman, I. (2019). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.
• Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2019). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage Publications.
• United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Confidentiality and privacy in mental health services. HHS.gov.
• World Health Organization. (2019). Guidelines on mental health action in primary health care. WHO Publications.