Professor Michael Wants To Know More About The Mental 243208

Professor Michael Wants To Know More About the Mental Process Students

Professor Michael wants to know more about the mental process students go through as they learn about research methods. She also wants to know which instructional methods are most effective for teaching research methods to her students. Assume that Professor Michael decides to take a quantitative approach to studying these questions. State a specific research question related to her general research problem that lends itself well to a quantitative research approach. Then explain why your question is better addressed using a quantitative, rather than a qualitative, methodology. APA Format 500 word minimum.

Paper For Above instruction

In educational research, understanding the mental processes students engage in while learning new concepts, such as research methods, is essential for optimizing instructional strategies and improving learning outcomes. Professor Michael, aiming to explore this area, has opted for a quantitative research approach to investigate the mental processes students undergo and the effectiveness of various instructional methods in teaching research methods. The core research question that aligns with her objectives and lends itself well to a quantitative methodology is: "How do students' levels of conceptual understanding of research methods vary after exposure to different instructional strategies, as measured by standardized assessment scores?"

This question is particularly suited for a quantitative approach because it seeks to quantify the relationship between instructional methods and students' understanding of research concepts. Quantitative research is ideal here because it enables the measurement and statistical analysis of differences in assessment scores, providing objective data on the effectiveness of various teaching strategies. By employing standardized tests or assessments to evaluate students' grasp of research methodologies, Professor Michael can collect numerical data that facilitates comparisons across different instructional conditions. This allows for the identification of statistically significant differences, thereby offering empirical evidence for which methods most effectively enhance students' understanding.

Furthermore, this research question lends itself to the use of experimental or quasi-experimental designs, where students can be systematically assigned to different instructional groups. Quantitative data collected from assessments before and after the intervention can reveal the extent of learning gains attributable to each instructional method. This approach ensures that results are generalizable and can be statistically analyzed to determine impact size and significance. In contrast, a qualitative approach, which might involve interviews or open-ended responses, would provide rich, detailed insights into students' mental processes but would not facilitate the levels of measurement necessary to draw broad, generalizable conclusions about instructional effectiveness.

Quantitative methods also enable researchers to control extraneous variables and establish causal relationships more effectively than qualitative methods. By deploying standardized assessment tools, Professor Michael can reduce subjective biases and ensure consistency in measuring students' understanding levels. This precision is crucial when making recommendations for instructional best practices based on empirical evidence. Quantitative data can also be easily synthesized and compared across larger sample sizes, increasing the robustness and reliability of the findings.

In sum, the specific research question regarding how students' understanding varies with different instructional methods is best suited for a quantitative approach because it emphasizes measurement, comparison, and statistical analysis. Quantitative research provides the tools necessary to produce objective, generalizable, and statistically valid conclusions about the effectiveness of teaching strategies for research methods. This approach will allow Professor Michael to make data-driven decisions that can positively influence instructional design and improve student learning outcomes in the classroom setting.

References

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Mertens, D. M. (2018). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Neuman, W. L. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Punch, K. F. (2014). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.