Program Evaluation 2013 Argosy University Overview

Page 1 Of 7 Program Evaluation 2013 Argosy Universityoverview Of Ras

Using at least 3–5 scholarly resources from the professional literature, research human service needs assessment. The literature may include the Argosy University online library resources, relevant textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, and websites created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions (.edu, .org, or .gov). Create a 7- to 9-page report in a Microsoft Word document, including the following: Identify a program at a social agency or other human services program to which you have access and provide a description of the organizational context including the mission and objectives of the program and why an evaluation is being considered. Conduct a needs assessment using concepts presented previously to confirm and explain the scope of the problem, the perceived versus actual gap in service, the affected population, whether the need is changing, and in what manner the need may be changing. Identify possible resources to meet the perceived needs. Discuss what existing resources can be used, what additional information would be needed, and what sources for obtaining data you would use. Identify the stakeholders who need to be included in the assessment and subsequent evaluation. Analyze the interpersonal, political, and ethical considerations of interacting with decision makers and stakeholders who may have conflicting priorities and determine strategies for reconciling those priorities.

Paper For Above instruction

This scholarly report aims to explore the process of conducting a human service needs assessment within a specific program context, highlighting critical considerations for effective evaluation and resource allocation. The importance of needs assessment as a foundational step in program evaluation cannot be overstated, as it helps define the scope and justify the necessity for evaluating particular human services programs. This paper integrates insights from scholarly resources to provide a comprehensive approach to needs assessment, resource identification, stakeholder analysis, and strategic interaction with decision makers.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving landscape of human services, accountability and program evaluation serve as vital mechanisms to ensure effective service delivery amid limited resources. Needs assessments are central to these processes, offering a systematic way to identify gaps between current services and community needs. This paper details a strategic approach to conducting a needs assessment for a chosen social program, underscoring the significance of evidence-based practices and stakeholder engagement.

Organizational Context and Program Description

The selected program for this assessment is a community mental health initiative operated by a local social service agency. The mission of this program is to enhance mental health services accessibility, especially targeting underserved populations such as homeless individuals and low-income families. Its objectives include increasing service outreach, improving client outcomes, and fostering community partnerships. An evaluation is being considered due to recent shifts in client demand, funding challenges, and the need to demonstrate program efficacy to funders and stakeholders.

Conducting a Needs Assessment

The needs assessment process involves a multidimensional analysis of the community and the program’s capacity. Firstly, the scope of the problem encompasses rising mental health issues in the community, compounded by barriers to access such as transportation, stigma, and lack of awareness. Scholarly literature emphasizes the importance of understanding both perceived needs—those recognized by community members—and actual needs—those identified through data analysis (Brown & Smith, 2019).

Data sources include community surveys, demographic statistics, and service utilization records. For example, a local health department report highlights an increase in mental health-related emergency visits, indicating a growing need. The perceived gap involves the community’s lack of awareness or stigma discouraging service use, whereas the actual gap reflects insufficient availability of accessible mental health services.

The affected population primarily comprises low-income adults, the homeless, and youth with mental health challenges. The need is dynamic; recent events such as economic downturns and the COVID-19 pandemic have intensified mental health issues, necessitating flexible and adaptive service responses.

Resources to Meet Needs

Existing resources, including federal and state mental health grants, community partnerships with healthcare providers, and volunteers, form the current foundation for addressing the identified needs. Additional data collection, such as client satisfaction surveys and outcome tracking, would enrich understanding. Data can be obtained through collaboration with local health authorities, existing health information systems, and community feedback mechanisms (Johnson, 2020). Strategic partnerships with hospitals and academic institutions can also facilitate rigorous data collection and analysis efforts.

Stakeholders in the Assessment

Key stakeholders include program staff, clients, community leaders, funders, local government agencies, and partnering healthcare organizations. Engaging these stakeholders ensures relevance and buy-in for the evaluation process. Stakeholder analysis reveals varied priorities: clients seek accessible and respectful care; funders prioritize measurable outcomes; community leaders focus on social equity (Williams et al., 2021).

Effective stakeholder engagement involves transparent communication, shared decision-making, and culturally sensitive practices.

Interpersonal, Political, and Ethical Considerations

Evaluating human service programs involves navigating complex interpersonal dynamics, political interests, and ethical mandates. Interpersonal considerations include building trust with clients and staff, respecting confidentiality, and demonstrating cultural competence (Miller & Rose, 2018). Politically, stakeholders may have conflicting priorities; for instance, funders may favor short-term metrics while community advocates emphasize long-term sustainability.

Ethically, practitioners must adhere to principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, ensuring equitable treatment and protecting vulnerable populations (American Psychological Association, 2017). Strategies for reconciling conflicting priorities include establishing common goals, advocating for transparency, and employing consensus-building techniques such as structured deliberation and collaborative planning.

Conclusion

In sum, a comprehensive needs assessment is essential for informing effective program evaluation and resource allocation within human services. Recognizing the organizational context, engaging stakeholders, and ethically navigating interpersonal and political complexities enhance the likelihood of developing tailored, responsive interventions. Implementing findings systematically ensures continuous improvement and alignment with community needs.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
• Brown, L., & Smith, J. (2019). Community needs assessment: A comprehensive approach. Journal of Social Services, 45(2), 123-135.
• Johnson, D. (2020). Data collection strategies in human services evaluation. Human Service Research, 8(4), 245-259.
• Miller, T., & Rose, S. (2018). Building trust in community-based programs. Journal of Community Psychology, 40(5), 590-602.
• Williams, R., Garcia, M., & Lee, K. (2021). Stakeholder engagement in social service evaluations. Public Administration Review, 81(3), 453-465.