Progressive Case Study: Macarthur And Associates Was Establi

Progressive Case Study macarthur And Associates Was Established Over 50

MacArthur and Associates, a company with over 50 years of history, has accumulated extensive records of projects, departments, business plans, and amendments, stored offsite in physical boxes. As the organization seeks to develop a learning library from these historical resources, a comprehensive needs assessment and task analysis are essential to identify key priorities and establish an effective process. This assessment should begin with defining the primary objectives—such as leveraging historical data to enhance organizational knowledge and performance—and evaluating current resource constraints, including personnel, time, and financial costs associated with digitizing and organizing this information.

Applying goal setting theory (Locke & Latham, 2002), clear, specific, and measurable goals should guide the development of the learning library. For instance, establishing targets for the number of digitized records, defined deadlines, and usage metrics can foster motivation and focus among staff involved in the process. Additionally, the concept of a learning organization, as described by Senge (1990), underscores the importance of fostering a culture of continuous improvement, knowledge sharing, and adaptive learning. Such an environment enhances performance by enabling the organization to respond swiftly to changes and innovate effectively.

Implementing a well-structured learning library can significantly improve organizational performance by preserving institutional memory, facilitating decision-making, and supporting strategic growth. It reduces redundancy, accelerates onboarding, and encourages best practices sharing, thus contributing to a resilient and competitive organization. Addressing these needs through a systematic assessment aligned with goal-setting principles ensures that the library project maximally benefits MacArthur and Associates’ ongoing development efforts.

References

• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.
• Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Addison Wesley.
• Kim, D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 37–50.
• Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (1999). Facilitating learning organizations: Making learning count. Gower Publishing.
• Crossan, M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 437–455.
• Easterby-Smith, M., & Lyles, M. A. (2015). Organizational learning: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
• Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78–91.
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
• Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization. Training & Development Journal, 47(9), 29–37.