Progressive Case Study: The Model And Process For Improving

Progressive Case Studythe Model And Process For Improving Performance

Progressive Case Study The model and process for improving performance is taking shape. Knowledge and change management are major challenges to most organizations. Individual and organizational learning are very different concepts though they are reliant on each other. The leadership management team at MacArthur and Associates would like more information on how you will begin to transition the individuals and the organization as a rule using learning, knowledge, and change management? Please provide a 200 word (minimum) report with credible resources to the leadership team addressing the changes within the organization using learning and knowledge management. Provide substantive feedback on a minimum of 100 words.

Paper For Above instruction

In fostering organizational performance improvement at MacArthur and Associates, integrating learning, knowledge management, and change management is pivotal. Transitioning individuals and the organization requires a strategic approach that emphasizes creating a learning culture, facilitating knowledge sharing, and managing change effectively. Initially, implementing comprehensive learning initiatives, such as workshops and e-learning modules, can enhance individual competencies aligned with organizational goals. To ensure knowledge retention and transfer, adopting knowledge management systems—like databases, intranets, and collaborative platforms—encourages openness and accessibility of information (Davenport & Prusak, 1998). Simultaneously, fostering a culture that values continuous improvement necessitates strong leadership support, transparent communication, and recognition of learning efforts (Argyris & Schön, 1996). Change management strategies, such as Kotter’s 8-Step Process, help restructure organizational routines, minimize resistance, and embed new behaviors (Kotter, 1997). It is essential to cultivate an environment where employees are engaged and empowered through participative decision-making and feedback loops. By integrating these strategies, MacArthur and Associates can facilitate sustainable change, enhance knowledge sharing, and build a resilient learning organization aligned with performance improvement goals. Ultimately, a deliberate and well-structured approach ensures a smoother transition embracing ongoing learning and adaptability.

References

• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley.
• Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press.
• Kotter, J. P. (1997). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency.
• Hamel, G., & Välikangas, L. (2003). The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 52-63.
• Crossan, M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537.
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
• Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 977-1002.
• Edmondson, A. (2008). The competitive advantage of learning organizations. California Management Review, 50(1), 40-55.
• Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 168-176.