Project 2 Grading Rubric Total Value 20 Points O Research Po

Project 2 Grading Rubrictotal Value 20 Points O Research Portion

Research for Project 2 involves understanding the overall topic space of music and a target user group, supported by reliable scholarly or trusted sources. The research should be fully interpreted and resynthesized into a written format over two pages, highlighting key insights that inform the subsequent concept development.

The project must include a detailed concept creation based on the research, supported by a clear design rationale that explains how research findings underpin design choices. The concept should be presented over two pages, incorporating at least three self-sketched images demonstrating the design, interface, and interactivity aspects of the concept. All images must be original, hand-drawn or digitally created, and inline citations are required for sources and images.

The final submission is a single PDF file formatted with specific guidelines: a title page, research portion, concept portion, attributions/works cited page, and optional appendices. The project emphasizes perceived effort and following instructions, including formatting, content, and integration of research and sketches. During the process, four methods of observational or interview research are required, with at least one interview and one observation, to support the design process.

Paper For Above instruction

The integration of research and conceptual development is fundamental in product design, especially within the music industry, where understanding user needs and technological trends fosters innovative solutions. This paper delineates a systematic approach for students to develop a comprehensive project involving extensive research, visual concepting, and critical reflection, aligned with precise formatting and documentation standards.

Research Phase: In the initial phase, students are tasked to immerse themselves in the music sub-sector of their choice—be it music applications, production, sharing platforms, live concerts, speakers, or accessories. The research must be drawn from reputable scholarly or trusted sources that provide a deep understanding of the sector’s current landscape, technological challenges, user behaviors, and market trends. An emphasis on target user groups prioritizes empathetic design, where insights are gathered through methods such as interviews and observations. Conducting a minimum of four research methods—at least one interview and one observation—is mandated to gather qualitative data, which will underpin the design rationale.

Students should synthesize their research findings, identifying core issues and opportunities for innovative solutions. The research findings and insights should be articulated clearly, setting a robust foundation for the subsequent concept development. Throughout this phase, inline citations are essential to substantiate claims and acknowledge sources, employing a consistent citation style such as MLA or APA. The proper documentation of resources is crucial to avoid the critical consequence of a zero score on the attribution page.

Concept Development: Building on research insights, students should conceive a singular, original product idea or a significantly iterated design from existing solutions, which addresses identified user needs or market gaps. The conceptualization should be supported by a detailed design rationale, explicitly linking research findings to specific design features, interface decisions, or interactive elements. This ensures the project demonstrates thoughtful, evidence-based decision-making.

Visual representation plays a vital role; students must include at least three self-created sketches that visually communicate their concept’s core aspects. These images should be detailed enough to support the written description, illustrating key interactions, layout, or aesthetic features. The sketches can be hand-drawn or created digitally, but all images must be original works, with inline citations for images and sources.

Presentation of the concept should be optimized within a two-page landscape layout, utilizing multiple columns for clarity. The write-up should cover aspects of design, interface, and interactivity, explained from the target user group's perspective. A compelling rationale combined with visual sketches strengthens the credibility and coherence of the project.

Furthermore, the project requires meticulous documentation of attributions and sources on pages dedicated to Works Cited, formatted consistently according to the chosen style guide. This serves both academic integrity and clarity, ensuring all sources are properly credited.

Final Submission and Process Expectations: Students must submit one PDF file containing all components—title page, research, concept, attributions, and optional appendices—formatted as specified. The process entails weekly phases, starting with research, followed by concept development, and culminating in peer presentations and critique sessions, fostering iterative improvement. No resubmissions are permitted; high-quality work on the first attempt is essential.

Effort and adherence to instructions heavily influence grading, encapsulating presentation quality, organization, completeness, and clarity. The project’s success hinges on seamless integration between research insights and concept design, with attention to detail, originality, and thoughtful justification driving the process.

References

• Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Creates New Alternatives for Business and Society. Harper Business.
• Gube, A. (2018). User-centered design: A comprehensive overview. Design Management Journal, 12(4), 44-59.
• Hassenzahl, M. (2010). Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, 3(1), 1–95.
• Kujala, S. (2003). User Involvement: A Review of the Benefits and Challenges. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(1), 1-16.
• Norman, D. A. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books.
• Poltrock, S., & Moran, T. (2005). User-Centered Design: Methods, Tools, and Techniques. In J. Jacko (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction: Advances in Design, Evaluation, and Application (pp. 137-154). CRC Press.
• Schneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., & Elmqvist, N. (2016). Designing the user interface: Patterns for effective interaction design. Pearson.
• Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., & Preece, J. (2019). Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley.
• Song, Y., & Ryu, H. (2015). Visual sketching for design innovation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 59(1), 177-181.
• Verghese, S., & Rani, S. (2020). Integrating Observation and Interview Methods in UX Research. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(10), 920-935.