Project Approach: Financial Competition Among Teams And Univ

Project Approachfinancial Competition Among Teams And Universities In

Financial competition among teams and universities involves the formation of investment teams with specific guidelines. Each team should comprise a minimum of 7 students and a maximum of 8 students. These teams are allocated a starting capital of $4,000,000 in equity for trading on the NYSE and NASDAQ stock exchanges. The trading activities are restricted to equities, and the team manages a single, unified portfolio throughout the program period.

The teams collaborate to perform in-depth market research, develop investment strategies, and make buy, hold, or sell decisions aimed at building and managing their portfolios effectively. A designated Team Leader coordinates all activities and serves as the primary liaison with the directors overseeing the competition. Each team focuses on specific functions: market research (stock analysts' roles), execution and trading processes (traders' roles), and portfolio management and asset allocation.

Periodic presentations are a crucial component, as teams must present their strategies, trade justifications, and portfolio performance to the Investment Review Committee (IRC). These presentations occur three times: initially on March 20, 2016, after the first trading period on April 10, 2016, and finally after the third trading period on May 1, 2016. The IRC provides feedback regarding performance and strategy compliance, fostering a learning environment. The final evaluation considers quantitative performance metrics, strategic analysis, risk management, decision-making processes, teamwork, and presentation skills.

Participants are required to record all trades accurately and maintain backup records as a contingency against data loss. Trades are executed on the Stocktrak platform, with an online record of trades and physical or digital “deal tickets” documenting analysis, strategy, and expectations. Each trade incurs a $5.00 commission fee. Portfolio composition must include no more than 30 stocks at any time, with a maximum of 10 trades per day after the initial trading week. The total number of trades permitted throughout the competition is capped at 200.

The initial portfolio allocation should include at least 90% equities, with no single stock exceeding 20% of the portfolio's total value. Cash holdings can constitute up to 10% of the portfolio at any time, although during the first week, the maximum cash balance permitted is 20%. Cash holdings do not accrue interest. Equity valuations are based on market prices at the close of each trading day.

Team performance is monitored based on several criteria, including the strategic soundness of their investment approach, risk management tactics, teamwork, presentation quality, and overall financial results. The competition aims to provide a comprehensive learning experience, emphasizing practical investment skills, data analysis, and collaborative decision-making. Evaluation forms used by the IRC facilitate consistent and objective assessment of each team's performance, fostering a competitive yet educational environment.

Paper For Above instruction

The simulation of financial markets through student-led investment teams provides an invaluable experiential learning opportunity that closely mirrors real-world trading environments. This competition fosters not only technical skills such as analysis, decision-making, and risk management but also soft skills such as teamwork, communication, and strategic thinking. The structured rules and evaluation criteria serve to simulate professional investment practices while encouraging iterative learning and continuous improvement.

At the core of this competition is the principle of active portfolio management, where teams are tasked with making real-time decisions based on market research and analysis. The constraints—such as a maximum of 30 stocks in a portfolio, a cap of 10 trades per day, and trade commissions—are designed to simulate actual trading limitations faced by institutional investors. These restrictions compel teams to be judicious with their trading activity, emphasizing quality over quantity while honing their analytical rigor.

Market research is a foundational element, requiring students to analyze economic trends, sector performance, and individual stock fundamentals. Understanding the role of stock analysts and leveraging this information allows teams to identify investment opportunities aligned with their strategies. This analytical process is crucial for developing justified trade decisions, which are then executed within the framework of the competition rules.

The emphasis on strategy development and presentation fosters critical thinking and communication skills. Teams must articulate their investment rationale clearly, justify their trades with data, and discuss their future outlook to the IRC. This process simulates professional investor presentations and encourages transparency, strategic discipline, and accountability.

Risk management remains central in the competition. Teams are encouraged to diversify their holdings, limit exposure to individual stocks, and monitor their portfolio’s risk profile continuously. The rule that no single stock can exceed 20% of the portfolio ensures diversification and reduces the potential for catastrophic losses, reflecting real-world risk mitigation strategies used by professional investors.

The performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative criteria promote a holistic assessment. Quantitative metrics—such as portfolio return, risk-adjusted performance, and adherence to trading limits—provide objective performance measures. Qualitative assessments focus on strategic reasoning, teamwork, and presentation quality, acknowledging the importance of communication and collaboration in investment management.

This competition also underscores the importance of continuous learning. The iterative process of strategy formulation, trading, review, and adjustment mirrors professional asset management workflows. Feedback from the IRC acts as a coaching mechanism, guiding teams to refine their strategies, enhance their understanding of market dynamics, and improve their decision-making processes.

Furthermore, the use of online trading platforms like Stocktrak ensures efficiency and real-time data access, which is critical for timely decision-making. Maintaining physical or offline records of trades and analysis ensures accountability and facilitates post-trade reviews and learning. These practices reinforce professional standards and ethical considerations vital in financial markets.

In conclusion, this simulation offers a comprehensive educational platform that blends theoretical finance with practical trading experiences. By challenging students to replicate professional investment processes, it deepens their understanding of capital markets while fostering essential skills for their future careers. Such experiential learning initiatives are instrumental in bridging the gap between academic theory and real-world application, preparing students for the complexities and demands of financial markets.

References

• Bryan, L. L., & Roberts, S. (2017). Stock Market Simulation for Business Students. Journal of Education for Business, 92(2), 86-93.
• Fabozzi, F. J., & Markowitz, H. M. (2002). The Theory and Practice of Investment Management. Wiley.
• Jorion, P. (2007). Financial Risk Manager Handbook. Wiley Finance.
• Kritzman, M., Li, Y., Page, S., & Turkington, D. (2011). Asset Allocation and Portfolio Management. Financial Analysts Journal, 67(3), 20-33.
• Mandelbrot, B. (1963). The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices. The Journal of Business, 36(4), 394-419.
• Martin, J. D. (2016). Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management. Cengage Learning.
• Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Business, 39(1), 119-138.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., & Jaffe, J. (2013). Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Senior, M., & Swald, F. (2018). Experiential Learning in Finance Education. Journal of Financial Education, 44(1), 123-134.
• Watson, S., & Head, C. (2015). Financial Markets and Portfolio Management. Pearson.