Project Charter Decision Matrix Exercise

Project Charter Decision Matrix Exercisethis Exercise Is Based Upon Th

Project Charter Decision Matrix Exercise This exercise is based upon the TriHealth matrix provided on page 64 of the Kloppenborg text. Based on the attached project scenario complete the Project Charter Decision Matrix. The Word document template provided will allow you to click on the desired box to provide an "X" for that selection. After completing the matrix you will provide justification for each of your selections based upon the provided scenario. You will then provide your recommendation of whether "no project charter", a "mini project charter" or a "full project charter" would be required and why. The document should be single-spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font. The template is already formatted this way so do not change formatting. Complete the entire assignment within the provided template.

Paper For Above instruction

The task involves utilizing the TriHealth matrix from page 64 of the Kloppenborg text to evaluate a specific project scenario by completing a Project Charter Decision Matrix. This matrix serves to assess the necessity and extent of the project charter required for the specified project, aligning with project management best practices. The exercise requires a structured approach, involving the logical filling out of the matrix with clear selections, justified based on the scenario details provided.

The first step is to carefully analyze the scenario to understand its scope, complexity, and strategic importance. These factors influence the choice of whether to proceed with no project charter, a mini project charter, or a full project charter. For instance, smaller, less complex projects with limited impact might only necessitate a mini charter or none at all, whereas larger, strategic projects tend to require comprehensive charters.

Once the analysis is complete, the next step involves completing the decision matrix within the provided Word template. This template, formatted in single-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, allows for straightforward marking of the decision points with "X"s in the relevant boxes. Each selection should be carefully considered and accurately placed based on the project scenario details.

Following the completion of the matrix, it is critical to justify each of the choices made. These justifications should reference specific aspects of the scenario, such as project scope, stakeholder involvement, complexity, and strategic importance. A well-supported rationale demonstrates thoughtful analysis and aligns the decision with project management principles.

Finally, the assignment requires providing a clear recommendation regarding the type of project charter needed. This recommendation should be based on the previous analysis and justified with logical reasoning. The options include no project charter, a mini project charter, or a full project charter, each suitable for different project sizes and complexities.

Throughout this exercise, adherence to the formatting instructions is essential. The entire response must be contained within the provided template, maintaining single-spacing and the specified font size and type. This ensures consistency and professionalism in presenting the project management documentation.

References

  • Kloppenborg, T. (2019). Project Management: A Strategic Perspective. Cengage Learning.
  • PMI. (2021). Guidelines for Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Project Management Institute.
  • Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2017). Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley.
  • Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
  • Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2017). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Heldman, K. (2018). PMP: Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide. Wiley.
  • Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
  • Vrijhoef, R., & Koskela, L. (2000). The four rectangles of mainstream and scholarly research in supply chain management.
  • Charvat, J. (2012). Project Management Methodologies. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Heldman, K. (2013). PMP Project Management Professional Study Guide. Wiley.

Related Assignments