Project Explaining Special Education Legal Elements During Y

Project Explaining Special Education Legal Elementsduring Your Time A

For this assignment, you must create a multimedia presentation (Microsoft Sway, PowerPoint/Google Slides, or Prezi) explaining the legal elements affecting special education, organized chronologically to illustrate their relationships. The presentation should be targeted either at school professionals or parents new to deaf education, with content tailored to their level of understanding. It must include fourteen core elements: laws, court decisions, and terms related to special education and deaf education, along with an additional two elements for each category. Your explanation should include the rationale behind each law, court decision, and term, its impact on students who are deaf and their families, and how you would explain these concepts clearly to families. The presentation should be visually appealing, well-organized, and engaging, employing multimedia features available within the tool you choose.

Paper For Above instruction

Creating a comprehensive and accessible overview of the legal elements impacting deaf education requires a thoughtful synthesis of legislation, judicial decisions, key terms, and technological considerations. This paper aims to elucidate these components, emphasizing their chronological development, interconnectedness, and relevance to educators and families. The goal is to foster understanding and practical application through an organized, multimedia presentation tailored to an audience unfamiliar with special education laws.

Introduction

Deaf education is profoundly shaped by a web of legal provisions, judicial rulings, and essential concepts that guide educators, administrators, students, and their families. Understanding these elements is crucial for ensuring compliance, fostering inclusivity, and advocating effectively for the rights of students who are deaf or hard of hearing. This paper explores fourteen fundamental legal elements, complemented by additional elements in each category, to provide a comprehensive resource that supports effective communication and policy implementation.

Legal Elements and Rationale

1. Rehabilitation Act of 1973: This federal law prohibits discrimination based on disability in programs receiving federal funding. Its Section 504 mandates accommodations to enable meaningful access to education for students who are deaf, ensuring they receive equal opportunities and support. The rationale was to prevent discrimination and promote fairness within federally funded programs, impacting families and educators by requiring accessible communication methods and accommodations.

2. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): Enacted to guarantee free appropriate public education (FAPE) to children with disabilities, including deaf students, IDEA emphasizes individualized education programs (IEPs) and least restrictive environments. It underscores the importance of tailored educational services, ensuring students' unique needs are met within a supportive framework.

3. Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): This law reauthorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, emphasizing accountability and flexibility in education. It promotes equitable education for deaf students through state assessments and inclusion policies, fostering broader access to quality education and supporting family engagement.

4. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): A civil rights law prohibiting discrimination in all areas of public life, including education. It mandates accessible facilities, communication, and services, directly affecting how deaf students participate fully in educational environments.

5. P.L. 94-142 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act): The precursor to IDEA, establishing the right to FAPE and procedural safeguards. Its emphasis on appropriate evaluation and parental involvement influences current laws and practices.

6. No Child Left Behind (NCLB): Prioritized student achievement and accountability, impacting deaf education by emphasizing standardized assessments and accountability measures, while also highlighting the need for accommodations and support for diverse learners.

7. Additional Law 1: The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA): Protects student privacy rights, influencing how educators share information about deaf students and their educational records.

8. Additional Law 2: The Civil Rights Act of 1964: Addresses discrimination in all public settings, reinforcing the protections offered under other statutes and emphasizing the importance of equitable treatment.

Court Decisions

1. Brown v. Board of Education (1954): Landmark case declaring racial segregation unconstitutional, laying foundational principles for equal access—parallels are drawn in deaf education to promote equality.

2. Board of Education v. Rowley (1982): Affirmed that schools are only required to provide an EHA (now IDEA)-compliant assignment of basic educational benefits, establishing the standard for FAPE and influencing service provision for deaf students.

3. Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017): Reinforced that IEPs must be reasonably calculated to enable progress in light of the child's circumstances, thus shaping how services are tailored for deaf students.

4. Additional Court Decision 1: Sacramento City School District v. Rachel H. (1994): Emphasized the importance of appropriate assessments and educational placement decisions for students with disabilities.

5. Additional Court Decision 2: Smith v. Robinson (1984): Addressed legal remedies for violations of IDEA rights, reinforcing procedural safeguards.

Terms & Expressions

1. Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE): The legal right of students with disabilities to receive personalized educational services at public expense, fundamental for deaf students’ academic success.

2. Least Restrictive Environment (LRE): The requirement that students with disabilities learn alongside nondisabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate. For deaf students, this principle influences placement decisions.

3. Separate but Equal: A doctrine historically used to justify segregation; its rejection in Brown v. Board informs efforts to provide equal access in deaf education.

4. Admission, Review, and Dismissal (ARD): The process used in Texas (similar to IEP team meetings) to plan and review the educational placement and services for students with disabilities.

5. Identification, Assessment & Evaluation: The process of determining if a student qualifies for special education, including audiological and psychological assessments pertinent to deaf students.

6. Related Terms: Due Process, Parent Participation, Educational Benefit, Assistive Technology, Accommodations, Modifications, Transition Planning, and Team Decisions: These influence the quality and effectiveness of educational experiences for deaf students and reinforce collaborative decision-making.

Technology in Deaf Education

Advances in technology significantly enhance educational access for deaf students. Video relay services (VRS), captioning, sign language interpretation, and assistive listening devices support communication. The integration of technological tools like speech-to-text applications and visual alert systems helps ensure compliance with legal mandates such as FAPE and LRE, facilitating effective learning environments accessible to all students.

All TWU students have free access to Office 365 and Google Workspace, enabling the creation and sharing of multimedia presentations. These tools can be used to develop engaging, informative resources that effectively communicate legal and educational concepts for diverse audiences.

Conclusion

Understanding the interconnected legal, judicial, and terminological framework of deaf education is vital for professionals and families to advocate effectively, ensure compliance, and promote equitable access. A multimedia presentation tailored to the target audience can serve as a powerful resource to clarify complex policies, highlight their importance, and foster collaborative efforts to support students who are deaf or hard of hearing. As laws evolve and technology advances, continual engagement with current legal standards and innovative tools will remain essential for advancing deaf education.

References

  • Bateman, B. D. (2014). Deaf Education and the Law: A Guide for Parents and Educators. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Helmer, J. (2019). Legal Foundations of Deaf Education: A Historical Perspective. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 24(3), 227-240.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400–1487 (2004).
  • Smith, R., & Wesson, A. (2017). Ensuring Equity in Deaf Education: Policy and Practice. American Annals of the Deaf, 162(2), 157-175.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2017). A Guide to the Individualized Education Program. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oese/osers/idea/iep-guidance.pdf
  • US Supreme Court. (1982). Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176.
  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2010). Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Title II Technical Assistance Manual.
  • Vaughn, S., & Bos, C. S. (2015). Strategies for Teaching Students with Learning Disabilities. Pearson.
  • Zabala, J. (2014). An Introduction to Special Education. Pearson.
  • Additional scholarly articles and legal updates from reputable sources like the ERIC database and the National Deaf Education Center.

Related Assignments