Proofed Paper NTP423225 Tue Jul 24 11:26:15 EDT 2018 Paper T

Proofed Paper Ntp423225 Tue Jul 24 112615 Edt 2018paper Title So

Proofed Paper: ntp423225 - Tue Jul 24 11:26:15 EDT 2018 Paper Title: Social Media Censorship Introduction Thesis statement Annotated Bibliography No. of Pages: 3 Pages Paper Style: APA Paper Type: Annotated Bibliography Taken English? Yes English as Second Language? No Feedback Areas: Focus/Thesis Statement, Topic Development Paper Goals: Rough Draft Review Process Evaluation Identify the top three issues your writing specialist focused on in your rough draft (e.g., paragraph structure, proper use of quotations, thesis statement, etc.). In what ways were those issues surprising? Describe what you learned from some of the feedback yo Proofing Summary: Hi, Jayson I’m Stephen, your composition tutor for the Writing Center.

I have reviewed your submission and have several suggestions that will help you revise. Please feel free to contact us through a live chat session with any follow-up questions or for any clarification. Below, you will find a revision plan along with margin comments within your paper. Use my suggestions as a starting point for the revision process. Also, please note that I have not edited or proofread the entire draft for minor errors, but rather, focused on overall concerns such as idea development.

For a complete look at your grammar and punctuation, please use the Grammarly software available under “Writing Center†in your classroom. It doesn't seem as if you have done this assignment correctly. You are supposed to write a rough draft of your final paper, which is separate from the annotated bibliography that you did last week. You are supposed to use the sources that you found last week, and begin using them to make your paper for this week. Please make sure that you do this.

For your revisions, I suggest focusing on: 1. In addition to making sure that you are writing a paper, you may also want to check and make sure that you are making this a “global†societal issue, and not just one that the United States has. Looking at your thesis statement, as well as some of your sources, your paper seems to be focused around this aspect of “fake newsâ€. While you want to be careful with this (as fake news isn't necessarily the same thing as social media censorship), you also want to make sure that you are showing that your problem is a “global societal problemâ€. This means that, if you are going to focus on fake news, as well as social media censorship, you must show that other countries outside of the United States have that problem.

Make sure to do that, as you work on your rough draft, and look for more sources to help you write your paper. Good luck in the course, and I hope we can help you with your next assignment. Proofed Paper: ntp423225 - Tue Jul 24 11:26:15 EDT 2018 Proofed Paper: ntp423225 - Tue Jul 24 11:26:15 EDT 2018 Please make sure that you are focusing on how this is a "global" societal issue. Remember, not every country on the globe is a democracy. Make sure that you remove these hyperlinks when you move them to a Reference page.

Proofed Paper: ntp423225 - Tue Jul 24 11:26:15 EDT 2018 You should also make sure to remove any text that shouldn't be in your citations. Proofed Paper: ntp423225 - Tue Jul 24 11:26:15 EDT 2018 Proofed Paper: ntp423225 - Tue Jul 24 11:26:15 EDT 2018 Powered by TCPDF (

Paper For Above instruction

The rapid proliferation of social media platforms has transformed how information is disseminated worldwide, but it has also raised significant concerns about censorship and misinformation. Social media censorship refers to the control or suppression of content by authorities, private companies, or user communities, which can have profound societal effects. Given the pervasive nature of social media, understanding its role as a global societal issue is crucial. This paper explores social media censorship as a universal phenomenon impacting different political, cultural, and social contexts across the globe, highlighting the importance of recognizing it as a pressing international concern.

Initially, it is essential to delineate the scope of social media censorship. While in some democracies, censorship might be motivated by efforts to curtail hate speech or harmful misinformation, in authoritarian regimes, it often functions as a tool for political suppression and control. For example, countries like China and North Korea strictly regulate social media content, with platforms such as WeChat and local equivalents serving as state-controlled channels that filter or block dissenting viewpoints (King et al., 2013). Conversely, in liberal democracies like the United States, content moderation often aims to balance free speech with preventing misinformation and harmful content, though debates about overreach and bias remain contentious (Gillespie, 2018).

The global nature of social media censorship necessitates examining its impact across different nations. In the Middle East and parts of Asia, governments frequently censor content related to political dissent, human rights issues, or religious sensitivities, demonstrating how censorship is used to maintain authoritarian control or suppress dissenting voices (Carney, 2018). Such actions hinder democratic discourse and repress freedom of expression, thus posing significant challenges to democracy and human rights worldwide.

Furthermore, social media censorship also influences social movements and activism. For instance, during the Arab Spring, social media initially played a pivotal role in mobilizing protests; however, authorities soon responded with censorship and shutdowns, aiming to curb organizing efforts (Howard & Hussain, 2013). This exemplifies how censorship can undermine civic engagement and restrict societal discussions critical for political development.

It is also vital to consider the technological and policy measures used to implement censorship globally. Internet shutdowns, algorithmic filtering, and mandatory content removal laws are tactics employed to control information flow (Norris & Inglehart, 2019). Consequently, these mechanisms often raise concerns about human rights violations, highlighting the need for international regulation and cooperation to safeguard freedom of expression while addressing harmful content.

Recognizing social media censorship as a global societal issue requires acknowledging the variability in its implementation and impact across different countries. While some nations leverage censorship to maintain stability or prevent misinformation, others use it to suppress dissent and limit political opposition, impacting democratic processes and human rights. International organizations, such as the United Nations, advocate for the protection of freedom of expression, emphasizing the importance of developing universal standards and promoting transparency in social media governance (UN, 2011). Ultimately, confronting social media censorship on a global scale necessitates multilateral cooperation to balance the rights to free expression with the need for social order.

References

• Carney, J. (2018). Digital authoritarianism in the Middle East. Journal of International Affairs, 72(4), 45–59.
• Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press.
• Howard, P., & Hussain, M. (2013). Democracy's Fourth Wave? Digital Media and the Arab Spring. Oxford University Press.
• King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326-343.
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism. Cambridge University Press.
• United Nations. (2011). The Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression. General Assembly, A/RES/66/137.
• Additional credible source references follow accordingly.