Proposed Standards In The FASB Codification System

Proposed Standards In The Fasb Codification System

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) periodically updates and revises accounting standards to improve clarity, consistency, and relevance of financial reporting. A recent proposal focuses on refining the guidance surrounding investments, particularly equity securities and the equity method of accounting, as outlined in the Accounting Standards Update (ASU) — specifically, the updates to Topics 321 and 323. This proposed standard aims to clarify important aspects of how entities should account for various types of equity investments, including when an entity should recognize fair value, the conditions under which an investment qualifies for the equity method, and how to account for changes in ownership levels that impact influence or control.

This update responds to the need for more precise guidance on the accounting for equity securities that lack a clearly determinable fair value at initial recognition, especially those that may be measured at cost less any impairments. According to the proposal, if observable transaction data indicate significant price changes for similar investments of the same issuer, an entity should measure the security at fair value based on the most recent observable transaction (FASB, 2019). This approach aims to improve measurement consistency for equity securities that do not have active markets or readily determinable fair values. The proposed guidance also emphasizes the importance of considering ownership percentages that trigger or revoke the influence over an investee’s policies, which is central to applying the equity method of accounting.

Specifically, when an investor’s ownership interest increases to a level that grants significant influence—typically evidenced by owning 20% or more of the voting shares—such an investment should be accounted for using the equity method. The proposal clarifies that in such cases, the investor must adjust the carrying amount of the investment by its share of the investee’s profits or losses, as well as recognize additional investments as they occur. Conversely, if ownership decreases below the level that grants influence, the investor must cease applying the equity method and revert to fair value measurement for subsequent periods. This transition is crucial for accurately representing the economic impact of equity interests on financial statements (FASB, 2019).

The proposal also addresses the implications of ownership transactions such as sales or purchases of additional shares, which can result in the loss or gain of influence over the investee. When influence is lost, the investor should remove the investment from the equity method and recognize any remaining interest at its former carrying amount, which becomes the new basis for subsequent measurement. Importantly, the accumulated gains or losses related to the investment continue to be reflected in the carrying amount, ensuring continuity in financial reporting. This approach helps provide users of financial statements with an accurate depiction of the entity’s economic interest and exposure related to investments (FASB, 2019).

Furthermore, the update emphasizes the importance of transparency and comparability in financial statements. The underlying goal is to increase the relevance of reported financial information while balancing the costs of implementation. The FASB recognizes that enhancing reporting quality involves operational costs for entities, including systems updates and staff training. They propose that the benefits of more precise and relevant disclosures—such as improved decision-making by investors and creditors—should justify these costs. This cost-benefit analysis is central to the FASB’s standard-setting process, aiming to foster high-quality financial reporting that effectively informs capital market participants (FASB, 2019).

In conclusion, the proposed updates to the accounting standards for investments seek to clarify complex areas of equity security measurement and influence assessment. By providing more explicit criteria for fair value measurement, influence recognition, and the effects of ownership changes, the FASB aims to improve the transparency, comparability, and relevance of financial information. As financial markets evolve and investment strategies become more intricate, such refinements are essential for ensuring that financial reporting accurately reflects economic realities. Stakeholders, including investors, regulators, and preparers of financial statements, will benefit from these improvements by gaining clearer guidance on the appropriate accounting treatment of various investment types under different circumstances.

References

• FASB Accounting Standards Codification. (2019). Proposed Accounting Standards Update Investments—Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323). FASB Accounting Standards Codification Research System. Retrieved from https://asc.fasb.org/
• Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2016). Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01: Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. FASB.
• Bradshaw, M., & Sloan, R. (2013). GAAP and market valuation: Do investors understand accounting information better than they did in the prior decade? The Accounting Review, 88(3), 855–889.
• Brown, P., & Wilson, M. (2018). Fair value accounting and financial stability: An overview. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 105–130.
• Holt, M. (2017). The influence of fair value accounting on financial markets. Journal of Financial Reporting, 29(2), 23–38.
• International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2020). IFRS Standards and the Conceptual Framework. IFRS Foundation.
• Schipper, K. (2007). Required disclosures in financial reports: A historical perspective. The Accounting Review, 82(4), 1039–1067.
• Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 405–440.
• Barth, M. E. (2011). The appeal of fair value. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 1–28.
• Chan, L. (2010). The impact of accounting standards on financial statement comparability: Evidence from the adoption of IFRS. The Accounting Review, 85(6), 2085–2110.