Provide A Reflection Of At Least 500 Words Or 2 Pages 389266

Provide a reflection of at least 500 words (or 2 pages double spaced) of how

At UC, it is a priority that students are provided with strong educational programs and courses that allow them to be servant-leaders in their disciplines and communities, linking research with practice and knowledge with ethical decision-making. This assignment is a written assignment where students will demonstrate how this course research has connected and put into practice within their own career. Assignment: Provide a reflection of at least 500 words (or 2 pages double spaced) of how the knowledge, skills, or theories of this course have been applied, or could be applied, in a practical manner to your current work environment. If you are not currently working, share times when you have or could observe these theories and knowledge could be applied to an employment opportunity in your field of study.

Paper For Above instruction

The course has profoundly shaped my understanding of the interplay between research, ethical decision-making, and practical application within professional environments. Through exploring key theories and skills, I have developed a more nuanced perspective on how to implement these concepts to foster responsible leadership and operational excellence in my field. Specifically, the principles of information governance, strategic alignment, and risk management, as emphasized in the course, are directly applicable to my current work environment, which involves managing digital information systems in a corporate setting.

One of the core theories I encountered is the Information Governance framework, which emphasizes the effective management of information assets to reduce risks and support organizational objectives (MacLennan, 2017). In my role, I have been able to apply this theory by establishing clearer policies for data classification and retention, ensuring compliance with regulations such as GDPR and HIPAA. The emphasis on balance—between security and accessibility—has enabled me to design systems that support ethical data use while maintaining strong security controls. For instance, implementing role-based access controls based on governance principles has minimized internal risks associated with unauthorized data viewing or manipulation.

Furthermore, the course highlighted the importance of strategic alignment between IT initiatives and organizational goals (Tallon & Short, 2013). Recognizing that technology investments must serve broader business objectives, I have proposed and overseen initiatives that align cybersecurity improvements with operational efficiency. This has involved conducting risk assessments that prioritize security measures capable of supporting ongoing business processes without disruption. Such practices exemplify the ethical decision-making promoted in the course—balancing security needs with user privacy and operational continuity.

Another critical skill developed from this course is risk management, particularly the assessment and mitigation of cyber threats. In my current environment, I have adopted a proactive approach by integrating continuous monitoring tools and incident response protocols rooted in the risk management theories studied (Simberkoff, 2016). These practices help detect vulnerabilities early, respond effectively, and prevent data breaches—an application of the ethical obligation to protect stakeholder information (Bojana, 2018). Recognizing that cybersecurity is dynamic, I am also advocating for ongoing staff training, aligning with the course's emphasis on education as a key component of responsible governance.

Importantly, the theories around ethical decision-making have informed my approach to handling ethical dilemmas, such as balancing transparency with protecting sensitive information. When faced with data requests from third parties, I use the frameworks learned to evaluate not only legal compliance but also the moral implications of sharing data, ensuring decisions are aligned with organizational values and societal expectations. This ethical aspect underpins the practical application of course content, affecting stakeholder trust and organizational reputation.

In conclusion, this course has provided a foundational understanding of how to integrate research, ethical considerations, and practical skills in managing information and technology systems. My current work environment benefits from applying these principles, particularly in enhancing data management practices, aligning IT initiatives with organizational goals, and fostering an ethical culture of cybersecurity. As technology evolves, I am committed to continual learning and adaptation of these theories to support responsible and effective leadership.

References

• MacLennan, A. (2017). Information Governance and Assurance: Reducing Risk, Promoting Policy. Facet Publishing.
• Tallon, R. V., & Short, J. E. (2013). The Information Artifact in IT Governance: Toward a Theory of Information Governance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 141–178.
• Simberkoff, S. (2016). 5 best practices for information governance and risk management. KM World, 25(8), S30–S31.
• Bojana, K. (2018). Why your information governance strategy must start with email. Jatheon.
• Gundling, M. (2019). What every company should know about email management for Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance. Week.
• deMaine, M. (2016). Preparing Law Students for Information Governance. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 35(2), 101–123.
• Ward, D., & Carter, D. (2019). Information as an asset – Today’s Board Agenda. Business Information Review, 36(2), 53–59.
• Ali, P., Green, A., Robb, A., & Masli, A. (2022). Governing information technology (IT) investment: A contingency perspective on organization’s IT investment goals. Australian Journal of Management, 47(1), 3–23.
• Henttonen, K. (2017). Privacy as an archival problem and a solution. Archival Science, 17(3), 285–303.
• Viktor Mayer-Schönberger. (2010). Beyond Privacy, Beyond Rights—Toward a “Systems” Theory of Information Governance. California Law Review, 98(6), 1853–1885.