Provide An Example Of Tacit Knowledge And An Example 524114
Provide An Example Of Tacit Knowledge And An Example Of Expl
Provide an example of tacit knowledge and an example of explicit knowledge. 300 words in your reply. Indicate at least one source or reference.
Paper For Above instruction
Tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge are fundamental concepts within the field of knowledge management, differentiation in how knowledge is stored, shared, and utilized within organizations. Tacit knowledge refers to unarticulated, intuitive, and experience-based knowledge that individuals possess but find difficult to transfer or document explicitly. In contrast, explicit knowledge is formal, codified, and easily articulated, stored in documents, manuals, or databases, making it accessible and transferable.
An illustrative example of tacit knowledge can be found in the craftsmanship of a master chef. The chef’s intuitive understanding of flavors, techniques, and timing allows them to create dishes with a level of finesse that is hard to explicitly teach. For instance, a skilled chef’s ability to "sense" when a dish is perfectly seasoned or when the thermal contact in a cooking process is just right is rooted in tacit knowledge developed through years of hands-on experience and sensory perception. This type of knowledge is often learned informally, through observation, practice, and personal trial and error, making it difficult to communicate in words or write down explicitly (Polanyi, 1966).
On the other hand, an example of explicit knowledge is a cooking recipe stored in a cookbook or an online culinary guide. Recipes outline the specific ingredients, quantities, preparation steps, and cooking times, all of which can be documented and shared in written form. A recipe allows anyone with the ingredients and instructions to reproduce the dish, demonstrating the inherently explicit nature of this knowledge. This explicit knowledge can be easily transferred among individuals, facilitating learning and replication across different contexts and locations.
In essence, tacit knowledge embodies the personal, experiential know-how that resides within an individual, whereas explicit knowledge is formalized and codified information that can be systematically shared and taught. Both forms are critical to organizational learning, with tacit knowledge often serving as the foundation for developing explicit knowledge that can be disseminated more broadly (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995).
References
- Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. University of Chicago Press.
- Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
- Choo, C. W. (1998). The Knowing Organization: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Creating New Realities. Oxford University Press.
- Polanyi, M., & Prosch, H. (1975). Meaning. University of Chicago Press.
- Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.